Outpatient balloon catheter versus expectant management for post-term labor induction in nulliparous women: A randomized trial

被引:0
|
作者
Garabedian, C. [1 ,2 ]
Tillouche, N. [3 ]
Drumez, E. [4 ]
Labreuche, J. [4 ]
Dreyfus, M. [5 ]
Deruelle, P. [6 ]
机构
[1] CHU Lille, Dept Obstet, F-59000 Lille, France
[2] Univ Lille, ULR METRICS 2694, F-59000 Lille, France
[3] CH Valenciennes, Dept Obstet, F-59300 Valenciennes, France
[4] CHU Lille, Dept Stat, F-59000 Lille, France
[5] CHU Caen, Dept Obstet, F-14000 Caen, France
[6] CHU Montpellier, Dept Obstet, F-34000 Caen, France
关键词
Term pregnancy; Mechanical method; Balloon; Cesarean; Home induction; FOLEY CATHETER; PREGNANCIES; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102822
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Increased use of labor induction has renewed interest in outpatient cervical ripening. Post-term pregnancy (i.e., >= 41 weeks) is a specific situation of increased neonatal risk, including greater risk of perinatal death and adverse perinatal outcomes. While a high proportion of these patients will need induction, outpatient management of this specific population has never been studied. Therefore, our objective was to compare two policies of management of post term pregnancies: the use of a transcervical Foley catheter for outpatient cervical ripening compared with expectant management. Methods: Multicenter, randomized controlled open-label study comparing home induction with a Foley catheter versus expectant management. Inclusion criteria were nulliparous, live singleton fetus in a vertex position, postterm (at 41 + 4 days), requiring cervical ripening (Bishop score <6), intact membranes, and distance homehospital within 40 min. The primary endpoint was change in Bishop score beetween randomization (41 + 4 days) and consultation (41 + 5 days). Results: Forty-five women were included: 21 in the home induction group and 24 in the control group. The study was stopped due to low recruitment. The difference in Bishop score increases one day after randomization approached significance (p = 0.055), with home induction showing a larger change compared with expectant management (Cohen's d = 0.60; 95 % confidence interval [CI] -0.002 to 1.21). Regarding change in Bishop score, 81 % of home induction group patients had a better score at 41 + 5 days versus 52.2 % in the control group (relative risk = 1.55; 95 %CI 0.99 to 2.15). Conclusion: By specifically evaluating home induction in nulliparous women with post term pregnancies, we observed a Bishop score improvement in the home induction group. These data support further evaluation of induction methods and birth experiences in a larger cohort of this population. Trial registration: The study was registered under European policy (number EudraCT 2015-A01298-41) and on www.clinitrials.gov (number NCT02932319). Date of registration: 13/10/2016, Date of initial participant enrollment: 31/03/2017
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Foley catheter versus cervical double balloon for labor induction: a prospective randomized study
    Solt, Ido
    Wolf, Maya Frank
    Ben-Haroush, Shani
    Kaminskyi, Svetlana
    Ophir, Ella
    Bornstein, Jacob
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (07) : 1034 - 1041
  • [22] Transcervical foley catheter or vaginal misoprostol for induction of term pregnancy labor: a randomized trial
    Rosado-Tovar, Maria
    Reyna-Villasmil, Eduardo
    Santos-Bolivar, Joel
    Mejia-Montilla, Jorly
    Reyna-Villasmil, Nadia
    Fernandez-Ramirez, Andreina
    AVANCES EN BIOMEDICINA, 2016, 5 (03): : 129 - 137
  • [23] Paracetamol prior to catheter balloon insertion for labor induction-A randomized controlled trial
    Wolf, Maya Frank
    Sgayer, Inshirah
    Abu Shqara, Raneen
    Naskovica, Karina
    Kassis, Fatina
    Kushnir, Nataly
    Lavinsky, Miri
    Idilbi, Nasra
    Lowenstein, Lior
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2025, 7 (04)
  • [24] Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term
    Wolfe, Heather
    Timofeev, Julia
    Tefera, Eshetu
    Desale, Sameer
    Driggers, Rita W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 211 (01) : 53.e1 - 53.e5
  • [25] Induction of labor using balloon catheter as an outpatient versus prostaglandin as an inpatient: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Merollini, Katharina M. D.
    Beckmann, Michael
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 260 : 124 - 130
  • [26] Conventional versus modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial
    Chaoyue Wen
    Xuemin Liu
    Ying Wang
    Jun Wang
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22
  • [27] Conventional versus modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial
    Wen, Chaoyue
    Liu, Xuemin
    Wang, Ying
    Wang, Jun
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [28] Comparison of outcomes of labor induction with dinoprostone vaginal insert (PROPESS) and double balloon cook catheter in term nulliparous pregnancies
    Li, Shiyu
    He, Hua
    Zheng, Wenpei
    Liu, Jing
    Chen, Chaoli
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2025, 51 (01)
  • [29] Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial
    Shaheen, Nighat
    Khalil, Safia
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 39 (03): : 307 - 310
  • [30] Experiences of induction of labor with a catheter - A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the outpatient and inpatient setting
    Haavisto, Henna
    Polo-Kantola, Paivi
    Anttila, Ella
    Kolari, Terhi
    Ojala, Elina
    Rinne, Kirsi
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 100 (03) : 410 - 417