Outpatient balloon catheter versus expectant management for post-term labor induction in nulliparous women: A randomized trial

被引:0
|
作者
Garabedian, C. [1 ,2 ]
Tillouche, N. [3 ]
Drumez, E. [4 ]
Labreuche, J. [4 ]
Dreyfus, M. [5 ]
Deruelle, P. [6 ]
机构
[1] CHU Lille, Dept Obstet, F-59000 Lille, France
[2] Univ Lille, ULR METRICS 2694, F-59000 Lille, France
[3] CH Valenciennes, Dept Obstet, F-59300 Valenciennes, France
[4] CHU Lille, Dept Stat, F-59000 Lille, France
[5] CHU Caen, Dept Obstet, F-14000 Caen, France
[6] CHU Montpellier, Dept Obstet, F-34000 Caen, France
关键词
Term pregnancy; Mechanical method; Balloon; Cesarean; Home induction; FOLEY CATHETER; PREGNANCIES; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102822
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Increased use of labor induction has renewed interest in outpatient cervical ripening. Post-term pregnancy (i.e., >= 41 weeks) is a specific situation of increased neonatal risk, including greater risk of perinatal death and adverse perinatal outcomes. While a high proportion of these patients will need induction, outpatient management of this specific population has never been studied. Therefore, our objective was to compare two policies of management of post term pregnancies: the use of a transcervical Foley catheter for outpatient cervical ripening compared with expectant management. Methods: Multicenter, randomized controlled open-label study comparing home induction with a Foley catheter versus expectant management. Inclusion criteria were nulliparous, live singleton fetus in a vertex position, postterm (at 41 + 4 days), requiring cervical ripening (Bishop score <6), intact membranes, and distance homehospital within 40 min. The primary endpoint was change in Bishop score beetween randomization (41 + 4 days) and consultation (41 + 5 days). Results: Forty-five women were included: 21 in the home induction group and 24 in the control group. The study was stopped due to low recruitment. The difference in Bishop score increases one day after randomization approached significance (p = 0.055), with home induction showing a larger change compared with expectant management (Cohen's d = 0.60; 95 % confidence interval [CI] -0.002 to 1.21). Regarding change in Bishop score, 81 % of home induction group patients had a better score at 41 + 5 days versus 52.2 % in the control group (relative risk = 1.55; 95 %CI 0.99 to 2.15). Conclusion: By specifically evaluating home induction in nulliparous women with post term pregnancies, we observed a Bishop score improvement in the home induction group. These data support further evaluation of induction methods and birth experiences in a larger cohort of this population. Trial registration: The study was registered under European policy (number EudraCT 2015-A01298-41) and on www.clinitrials.gov (number NCT02932319). Date of registration: 13/10/2016, Date of initial participant enrollment: 31/03/2017
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ausbeck, Elizabeth B.
    Jauk, Victoria C.
    Xue, Yumo
    Files, Pamela
    Kuper, Spencer G.
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Casey, Brian M.
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    Tita, Alan T.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (03) : 597 - 606
  • [2] Balloon catheter for induction of labor in nulliparous women with prelabor rupture of the membranes at term
    Wolff, KS
    Swahn, ML
    Westgren, M
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1998, 46 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [3] Foley catheter versus intra-vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in post-term gestations
    Kandil, Mohamed
    Emarh, Mohamed
    Sayyed, Tarek
    Masood, Alaa
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 286 (02) : 303 - 307
  • [4] Foley catheter (80 vs 60 mL) and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial
    Sharma, Chanderdeep
    Jaryal, Sakshi
    Soni, Anjali
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (08)
  • [5] A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women
    Culver, J
    Strauss, RA
    Brody, S
    Dorman, K
    Timlin, S
    McMahon, MJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2004, 21 (03) : 139 - 146
  • [6] Foley catheter versus intra-vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in post-term gestations
    Mohamed Kandil
    Mohamed Emarh
    Tarek Sayyed
    Alaa Masood
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2012, 286 : 303 - 307
  • [7] The relative impact of labor induction versus improved labor management: Before and after the ARRIVE (a randomized trial of induction vs. expectant management) trial
    Fineberg, Annette E.
    Harley, Kim
    Lahiff, Maureen
    Main, Elliott K.
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2024, 51 (04): : 719 - 727
  • [8] Outpatient versus inpatient Foley catheter induction of labor in multiparas with unripe cervixes: A randomized trial
    Hamdan, Mukhri
    Shuhaina, Shuib
    Hong, Jesrine Gek Shan
    Vallikkannu, Narayanan
    Zaidi, Syeda Nureena
    Tan, Yi Pin
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 100 (11) : 1977 - 1985
  • [9] Early versus delayed amniotomy with immediate oxytocin after Foley catheter cervical ripening in nulliparous labor induction: A randomized trial
    Hasan, Nur Adlyn
    Hong, Jesrine Gek Shan
    Teo, Ik Hui
    Zaidi, Syeda Nureena
    Hamdan, Mukhri
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 159 (03) : 951 - 960
  • [10] Labor induction in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial of foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion
    Ghanaei, Mandana M.
    Sharami, Hajar
    Asgari, Alaeddin
    JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 10 (02) : 71 - 75