Self-Reported Factors Involved in Attrition and Retention of Pharmacy Faculty

被引:5
作者
Chu, Angela [1 ]
Unni, Elizabeth J. [2 ]
Murphy, Karrie [3 ]
Mantione, Maria M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Roseman Univ Hlth Sci, Coll Pharm, South Jordan, UT 84095 USA
[2] Touro Univ, Coll Pharm, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Charleston, Sch Pharm, Charleston, WV USA
[4] St Johns Univ, Coll Pharm & Hlth Sci, Queens, NY USA
关键词
Pharmacy; Faculty; Workforce; Workload; Leadership;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.100739
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate factors associated with pharmacy faculty attrition and retention. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was developed that consisted of 33 closed- and open-ended items related to reasons or potential reasons for leaving academia, motivating factors for staying in academia, and personal and professional demographic characteristics. The survey was distributed via Qualtrics to all current pharmacy faculty using the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy email listserv and posted in American Society of Health-System Pharmacists and American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy online communities to recruit participants who were no longer in academia. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data using SPSS. Results: A total of 1011 current and 79 former pharmacy faculty completed the survey, with the majority being female, white, full-time, nontenure track, pharmacy practice, and at associate rank. Of the current faculty, 21.5% intend to leave their current position within the next year and 37.4% of respondents think about leaving either daily or weekly. Faculty who are no longer in academia or potentially will leave their position cited an unmanageable workload as the most impactful reason, with other risk factors, including unsupportive/inadequate direct supervisors or senior leadership and inadequate work-life balance, compensation, and resources. The top reasons for staying in academia included having an adequate work-life balance, manageable workload, and meaningful relationships with students. Conclusions: The Academy and individual institutions must evaluate and address risk factors contributing to faculty attrition. Simultaneously, they should actively encourage conditions such as maintaining a manageable workload and promoting work-life balance to retain faculty members.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
AACP's Profile of pharmacy students, 1998, First Prof Pharm Degree (Pharm.D.) includes B. S. Pharmacy, B.Pharm, and Pharm.D.1
[2]  
American Association of Colleges of Nursing, about us
[3]  
Carter O, 2003, ANN PHARMACOTHER, V37, P197
[4]   Job turnover intentions among pharmacy faculty [J].
Conklin, Mark H. ;
Desselle, Shane P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 71 (04)
[5]   Faculty Burnout in Pharmacy Education [J].
Darbishire, Patricia ;
Isaacs, Alex N. ;
Miller, Monica L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 84 (07) :881-883
[6]   What are academic pharmacy organizations doing to reward performance and retain their star faculty? [J].
Desselle, Shane P. ;
Zgarrick, David P. ;
Ramachandran, Sujith .
RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2022, 18 (05) :2887-2893
[7]  
Dillman DA., 2014, Internet, phone, mail, and mixedmode surveys: The tailored design method, V4th ed.
[8]  
Dolezal J., The Chronical of Higher Education
[9]   The ASHP Section of Pharmacy Educators Crystal Ball project: Insight into the future of pharmacy education [J].
Eiland, Lea S. ;
Brown, Tim R. ;
Enderby, Cher Y. ;
Luchen, Georgia G. ;
Smith, Winter J. ;
Trovato, James A. ;
Chisholm-Burns, Marie A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2023, 80 (04) :236-241
[10]  
El-Ibiary SY, 2017, AM J PHARM EDUC, V81, DOI 10.5688/ajpe81475