A nuclear future? Small Modular Reactors in a carbon tax-driven transition to clean energy

被引:2
作者
Xie, Wanni [1 ]
Atherton, John [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Jiaru [1 ]
Farazi, Feroz [1 ]
Mosbach, Sebastian [1 ,2 ]
Akroyd, Jethro [1 ,2 ]
Kraft, Markus [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Chem Engn & Biotechnol, West Cambridge Site,Philippa Fawcett Dr, Cambridge CB3 0AS, England
[2] Cambridge Ctr Adv Res & Educ Singapore, 1 Create Way,05-05 CREATE Tower, Singapore 138602, Singapore
[3] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Chem & Biomed Engn, 62 Nanyang Dr, Singapore 637459, Singapore
[4] Alan Turing Inst, London NW1 2DB, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Small Modular Reactors (SMRs); Carbon tax; Placement policy; Clean energy transition; Fossil fuel replacement; Electrical power generation;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123128
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The study investigated the effect of a CO 2 tax to encourage the adoption of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) as an alternative to fossil fuels for power generation in the UK. The trade-offs of different SMR placement policy options with respect to the competing objectives of minimising transmission losses and population risk were investigated to understand the impact on the optimal placement and usage of SMRs at different carbon tax levels. Different assumptions about renewable power availability were explored. The study identified the most cost-effective number of SMRs per site and optimised the power flow for cost efficiency. Regardless of renewable power availability, a carbon tax in the range of 45-60 pound/t was found to incentivise the full adoption of SMRs with a levelised cost of electricity of 60 pound/MWh versus 0-20 pound/t at 40 pound/MWh. The SMR placement influenced the performance and cost of the energy system, as well as whether a region acted as a net importer or exporter of energy. The most cost-effective solutions were achieved by balancing transmission loss and population risk.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]  
National Grid ESO, 2023, Carbon Intensity API
[32]   Policies toward net-zero: Benchmarking the economic competitiveness of nuclear against wind and solar energy [J].
Nian, Victor ;
Mignacca, Benito ;
Locatelli, Giorgio .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 320
[33]  
OSullivan C., 2023, Technical report
[34]  
Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2020, Energy white paper: Powering our net zero future
[35]   Measuring the progress and impacts of decarbonising British electricity [J].
Staffell, Iain .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 102 :463-475
[36]   Uncertainties in estimating production costs of future nuclear technologies: A model-based analysis of small modular reactors [J].
Steigerwald, Bjoern ;
Weibezahn, Jens ;
Slowik, Martin ;
von Hirschhausen, Christian .
ENERGY, 2023, 281
[37]  
UKGovernment, 2022, British energy security strategy
[38]  
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), 2020, United Kingdom: High resolution population density maps + demographic estimates
[39]  
Zhang X., 2020, J ENV INF LETT, V3, P40, DOI [10.3808/jeil.202000026, DOI 10.3808/JEIL.202000026]
[40]   A multicriteria small modular reactor site selection model under long-term variations of climatic conditions-A case study for the province of Saskatchewan, Canada [J].
Zhang, Xiaoyue ;
Huang, Guohe ;
Zhou, Xiong ;
Liu, Lirong ;
Fan, Yurui .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 290