Effects of diameters of implant and abutment screw on stress distribution within dental implant and alveolar bone: A threedimensional finite element analysis

被引:5
作者
Shen, Yen -Wen [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Heng-Li [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Hsu, Jui-Ting [1 ,3 ]
Fuh, Lih-Jyh [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Sch Dent, 91 Hsueh Shih Rd, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
[2] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Dent, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] China Med Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Taichung, Taiwan
[4] Asia Univ, Dept Bioinformat & Med Engn, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Abutment screw; Implant diameter; Bone; Stress; Finite element analysis; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2023.12.020
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Few studies have investigated the effects of abutment screw diameter in the stress of dental implants and alveolar bones under occlusal forces. In this study, we investigated how variations in implant diameter, abutment screw diameter, and bone condition affect stresses in the abutment screw, implant, and surrounding bone. Materials and methods: Three-dimensional finite element (FE) models were fabricated for dental implants with external hex -type abutments measuring 4 and 5 mm in diameter. The models also included abutment screws measuring 2.0 and 2.5 mm in diameter. Each implant model was integrated with the mandibular bone comprising the cortical bone and four types of cancellous bone. In total, 12 finite element models were generated, subjected to three different occlusal forces, and analyzed using FE software to investigate the stress distribution of dental implant and alveolar bone. Results: Wider implants demonstrated lower stresses in implant and bone compared with standard -diameter implants. The quality of cancellous bone has a minimal impact on the stress values of the implant, abutment screw, and cortical bone. Regardless of occlusal arrangement or quality of cancellous bone, a consistent pattern emerged: larger abutment screw diameters led to increased stress levels on the screws, while the stress levels in both cortical and cancellous bone showed comparatively minor fluctuations. Conclusion: Wider implants tend to have better stress distribution than standard -diameter implants. The potential advantage of augmenting the abutment screw diameter is unfavorable. It may result in elevated stresses in the implant system. <feminine ordinal indicator> 2024 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY -NC -ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1126 / 1134
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Two Implant/Abutment Joint Designs: A Comparative Finite Element Analysis
    Khraisat, Ameen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (02) : E83 - E87
  • [32] Finite element analysis of stress at implant-bone interface of dental implants with different structures
    Chen Liang-jian
    He Hao
    Li Yi-min
    Li Ting
    Guo Xiao-ping
    Wang Rui-fang
    TRANSACTIONS OF NONFERROUS METALS SOCIETY OF CHINA, 2011, 21 (07) : 1602 - 1610
  • [33] Analysis of Stress Distribution on the Bone around an Implant Placed in the Anterior Maxilla Using Three Different Abutment Angulations by Means of Finite Element Analysis
    Shende, Snehal
    Jadhav, Amit
    Edake, Dhairaysheel N.
    Patil, Amit Hemraj
    Patil, Hansraj
    Agrawal, Nitu
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2021, 13 (06): : S1591 - S1596
  • [34] Finite Element Analysis of the Influence of the Offset Placement of an Implant-Supported Prosthesis on Bone Stress Distribution
    Anitua, E.
    Orive, G.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2009, 89B (02) : 275 - 281
  • [35] Stress Distribution in the Abutment and Retention Screw of a Single Implant Supporting a Prosthesis with Platform Switching
    Alvarez-Arenal, Angel
    Segura-Mori, Luis
    Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Ignacio
    Gago, Angel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (03) : E112 - E121
  • [36] Finite element analysis of mini implant biomechanics on peri-implant bone
    Hisam, Muhammad Juzaili
    Zaman, Izzuddin
    Shari, Safian
    Kurniawan, Denni
    Nor, Fethma M.
    DIGITAL MANUFACTURING TRANSFORMING INDUSTRY TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE GROWTH, 2019, 30 : 308 - 314
  • [37] Finite element analysis of dental implant prosthetics
    Aumnakmanee, Suchat
    Yodpiji, Nantakrit
    Jantong, Nattawut
    Jongprasithporn, Manutchanok
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 5 (03) : 9525 - 9534
  • [38] Influence of a new abutment design concept on the biomechanics of peri-implant bone, implant components, and microgap formation: a finite element analysis
    Nie, Huimin
    Tang, Yantai
    Yang, Yan
    Wu, Weijie
    Zhou, Wenjuan
    Liu, Zhonghao
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [39] Effect of Integration Patterns Around Implant Neck on Stress Distribution in Peri-Implant Bone: A Finite Element Analysis
    Han, Jingyun
    Sun, Yuchun
    Wang, Chao
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2017, 26 (06): : 549 - 558
  • [40] Biomechanical Evaluation of the Effects of Implant Neck Wall Thickness and Abutment Screw Size: A 3D Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis
    Jeng, Ming-Dih
    Lin, Yang-Sung
    Lin, Chun-Li
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (10):