Cross-sectional survey assessment of physical activity level and frequency of performing pelvic floor muscle exercises

被引:0
|
作者
Gan, Zoe S. [1 ]
Newman, Diane K. [1 ]
Smith, Ariana L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Ctr Adv Med, Dept Surg, Div Urol,Perelman Sch Med, 3400 Civ Ctr Blvd,3rd Floor West Pavil, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
CONTINENCE | 2023年 / 7卷
关键词
Pelvic floor; Pelvic floor exercises; Kegel; Physical activity; Exercise; Pelvic floor dysfunction; SELF-EFFICACY; BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS; URINARY-INCONTINENCE; ADHERENCE; WOMEN; THERAPY; PREDICTORS; ATTENDANCE; EDUCATION; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cont.2023.100715
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) exercises are a non-invasive and effective treatment option for female pelvic floor disorders, but patient adherence is often poor, and predictors of adherence are limited. Our objective was to evaluate the relationship between physical activity level in women and self-reported frequency of performing PFM exercises. Women who responded to a cross-sectional survey through Research Match, a national online volunteer registry, were stratified into low, moderate, and high activity categories based on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) Short Form. The Pearson Chi -square test was used to evaluate the association between activity level and the self-reported frequency of performing Kegels or PFM exercises. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the impact of physical activity level, demographic characteristics (including age, race, ethnicity, insurance status), and urinary symptoms (assessed by the Lower Urinary Tract Research Network -Symptom Index, LURN-SI 29) on performing PFM exercises several times a month or more. A total of 1,720 women were classified as having low (47.4%), moderate (26.3%), and high (26.3%) activity. More women in the high IPAQ category reported performing PFM exercises several times a month or more (17.0%, vs. 10.7% for moderate activity and 12.0% for low activity; P < 0.01). Women most commonly reported doing PFM exercises to improve sex (25.9%), to prevent getting a problem (17.8%), and because they were instructed to start doing them after childbirth (18.0%). Of women who provided a reason for not doing PFM exercises, those in the low and moderate activity groups were more likely to cite laziness as a reason compared to women in the high activity group (47.6% and 51.2%, respectively, vs. 38.7%; P = 0.02). On multivariable logistic regression, physical activity level and lacking insurance coverage were significant predictors of performing PFM exercises several times a week or more. Interventions aimed at increasing PFM exercise participation may benefit from linking to motivation, self-efficacy, and physical activity. The relationship between insurance coverage and frequency of performing PFM exercises warrants further exploration.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prevalence of urinary incontinence and pelvic floor muscle dysfunction in primiparae two years after cesarean section: cross-sectional study
    Pascon Barbosa, Angelica Mercia
    Marini, Gabriela
    Piculo, Fernanda
    Cunha Rudge, Cibele Vieira
    Paranhos Calderon, Iracema Mattos
    Cunha Rudge, Marilza Vieira
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 131 (02): : 95 - 99
  • [42] Effect of sociodemographic and physical activity on cognitive function in older adults: A nationwide cross-sectional survey
    Zhang, Yuting
    Gu, Yaohua
    Zhang, Yupeng
    Liu, Xiangxiang
    Zhang, Yanan
    Wu, Wenwen
    Chen, Xuyu
    Wang, Qiru
    Tan, Xiaodong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 34 (02) : 243 - 248
  • [43] Barriers to physical activity of stroke survivors in Singapore: A face-to-face cross-sectional survey
    Teo, Raylynn
    Thilarajah, Shamala
    Jiale, Liu
    Yu, Favian Lim Fang
    Khim, Kwah Li
    PROCEEDINGS OF SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE, 2023, 32
  • [44] Factors Influencing Physical Activity Level in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Johansen, Rakel Fuglsang
    Caunt, Sharon
    Heller, Simon
    Sander, Sarah Elton
    Molsted, Stig
    Sondergaard, Esben
    Kristensen, Peter Lommer
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2024, 48 (07) : 431 - 438.e1
  • [45] Do women runners report more pelvic floor symptoms than women in CrossFit®? A cross-sectional survey
    Lori B. Forner
    Emma M. Beckman
    Michelle D. Smith
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2021, 32 : 295 - 302
  • [46] Sexual function, delivery mode history, pelvic floor muscle exercises and incontinence: A cross-sectional study six years post-partum
    Dean, Nicola
    Wilson, Don
    Herbison, Peter
    Glazener, Cathryn
    Aung, Thiri
    Macarthur, Christine
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 48 (03) : 302 - 311
  • [47] Urinary incontinence and other pelvic floor dysfunctions in female athletes in Brazil: A cross-sectional study
    Almeida, M. B. A.
    Barra, A. A.
    Saltiel, F.
    Silva-Filho, A. L.
    Fonseca, A. M. R. M.
    Figueiredo, E. M.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2016, 26 (09) : 1109 - 1116
  • [48] Physical activity recommendations for patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey
    Hou, Liangying
    Ge, Long
    Li, Yanfei
    Chen, Yajing
    Li, Huijuan
    He, Juanjuan
    Cao, Changhao
    Li, Rui
    Tian, Jinhui
    Chen, Yaolong
    Liu, Xingrong
    Yang, Kehu
    ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2020, 57 (07) : 765 - 777
  • [49] A cross-sectional survey of participation of asthmatic children in physical activity
    Bo-Li Cheng
    Ying Huang
    Chang Shu
    Xiao-Li Lou
    Zhou Fu
    Jing Zhao
    World Journal of Pediatrics, 2010, 6 : 238 - 243
  • [50] Pelvic floor muscle assessment by digital palpation and translabial ultrasound of women with cervical or endometrial cancer after pelvic radiotherapy: a cross-sectional study
    Thais de Morais Siqueira
    Sophie Derchain
    Natalia Martinho
    Rodrigo Menezes Jales
    Cassia Raquel Teatin Juliato
    Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2021, 32 : 1237 - 1245