A two-stage optimization approach-based energy storage sharing strategy selection for limited rational users

被引:4
作者
Wang, Zaichuang [1 ]
Chen, Laijun [2 ]
Li, Xiaozhu [2 ]
Mei, Shengwei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Xinjiang Univ, Coll Elect Engn, Urumqi 830049, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Energy prop trading; Capacity sharing; Limited rationality; Evolutionary game; Pricing strategies; GAME-THEORETIC APPROACH; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS; FRAMEWORK; STATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.est.2024.112098
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In the context of energy storage sharing, as participants' awareness of privacy protection grows, obtaining information will become increasingly challenging, potentially leading decision-making energy storage users to exhibit traits of 'limited rationality'. Existing single energy storage sharing strategies models face challenges in providing adaptable sharing options to limited rational users. To this end, we first introduce a multi-strategies sharing model for energy storage, which integrates capacity sharing and energy prop trading. Following that, we develop a two-stage optimization approach to formulate the selection of sharing strategies for limited rational users. In Stage 1, the energy storage determines the pricing for sharing strategies, adopting both cost-based and demand-based approaches to measure shared capacity and traded energy. In Stage 2, each limited rational user chooses their optimal sharing strategies through a multi-strategy set evolutionary game model rooted in the logit protocol. We jointly solve for the evolutionary and price equilibrium of the two-stage optimization problem to obtain the optimal stabilization strategy. The simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model. Compared to the capacity sharing model, it not only results in a 6.8 % increase in net profit, reduces the payback period from 10.5 years to 7.8 years, but also reduces the energy costs for the users. Moreover, the model provides the most suitable sharing strategy for limited rational users, avoiding idealized conclusions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], About Imec
  • [2] Community energy storage: A smart choice for the smart grid?
    Barbour, Edward
    Parra, David
    Awwad, Zeyad
    Gonzalez, Marta C.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 212 : 489 - 497
  • [3] Economic viability of energy storage systems based on price arbitrage potential in real-time US electricity markets
    Bradbury, Kyle
    Pratson, Lincoln
    Patino-Echeverri, Dalia
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 114 : 512 - 519
  • [4] Demand Response Management With Multiple Utility Companies: A Two-Level Game Approach
    Chai, Bo
    Chen, Jiming
    Yang, Zaiyue
    Zhang, Yan
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2014, 5 (02) : 722 - 731
  • [5] Sharing Storage in a Smart Grid: A Coalitional Game Approach
    Chakraborty, Pratyush
    Baeyens, Enrique
    Poolla, Kameshwar
    Khargonekar, Pramod P.
    Varaiya, Pravin
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2019, 10 (04) : 4379 - 4390
  • [6] Clean Energy States Alliance, 2022, State leadership in clean energy: SMUD's energy storage shares and smart energy optimizer programs [EB/OL], -04-07
  • [7] A New and Fair Peer-to-Peer Energy Sharing Framework for Energy Buildings
    Cui, Shichang
    Wang, Yan-Wu
    Shi, Yang
    Xiao, Jiang-Wen
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2020, 11 (05) : 3817 - 3826
  • [8] The Utilization of Shared Energy Storage in Energy Systems: A Comprehensive Review
    Dai, Rui
    Esmaeilbeigi, Rasul
    Charkhgard, Hadi
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2021, 12 (04) : 3163 - 3174
  • [9] Dimitrov P, 2016, P AMER CONTR CONF, P3551, DOI 10.1109/ACC.2016.7525464
  • [10] Facchini A, 2017, NAT ENERGY, V2, DOI 10.1038/nenergy.2017.129