Molecular and physiological responses of two quinoa genotypes to drought stress

被引:2
|
作者
Zhu, Xiaolin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Wenyu [3 ]
Wang, Baoqiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Ling [4 ]
机构
[1] Gansu Agr Univ, Coll Life Sci & Technol, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Gansu Agr Univ, Gansu Prov Key Lab Aridland Crop Sci, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Gansu Acad Agr Sci, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Lanzhou Jiaotong Univ, Sch Biol & Pharmaceut Engn, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
quinoa; drought stress; physiology; transcriptome; molecular mechanism; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; GENE; PROTEIN; TOOL; IDENTIFICATION; EXPRESSION; TOLERANCE; KEGG;
D O I
10.3389/fgene.2024.1439046
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Quinoa is an important economic food crop. However, quinoa seedlings are susceptible to drought stress, and the molecular mechanism of drought tolerance remains unclear. In this study, we compared transcriptomic and physiological analyses of drought-tolerant (L1) and susceptible (HZ1) genotypes exposed to 20% PEG for 3 and 9 days at seedling stage. Compared with HZ1, drought stress had less damage to photosynthetic system, and the contents of SOD, POD and CAT were higher and the contents of H2O2 and O2 -were lower in L1 leaves. Based on the RNA-seq method, we identified 2423, 11856, 1138 and 3903 (HZ1-C3-VS-T3, HZ1-C9-vs-T9, L1-C3-vs-T3 and L1-C9-vs-T9) annotated DEGs. Go enrichment was shown in terms of Biological Process: DEGs involved in biological processes such as metabolic process, cellular process, and single-organism process were most abundant in all four comparison treatments. In Molecular Function: the molecular functions of catalytic activity, binding and transporter activity have the most DEGs in all four processes. Cellular Component: membrane, membrane part, and cell have the most DEGs in each of the four processes. These DEGs include AP2/ERF, MYB, bHLH, b-ZIP, WRKY, HD-ZIP, NAC, C3h and MADS, which encode transcription factors. In addition, the MAPK pathway, starch and sucrose metabolism, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and plant hormone signal transduction were significantly induced under drought stress, among them, G-hydrolases-66, G-hydrolases-81, G-hydrolases-78, Su-synthase-02, Su-synthase-04, Su-synthase-06, BRI1-20 and bHLH17 were all downregulated at two drought stress points in two genotypes, PP2C01, PP2C03, PP2C05-PP2C07, PP2C10, F-box01 and F-box02 were upregulated at two drought stress points in two genotypes. These results agree with the physiological responses and RNA-seq results. Collectively, these findings may lead to a better understanding of drought tolerance, and some of the important DEGs detected in this study could be targeted for future research. And our results will provide a comprehensive basis for the molecular network that mediates drought tolerance in quinoa seedlings and promote the breeding of drought-resistant quinoa varieties.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Molecular and Physiological Responses of Toona ciliata to Simulated Drought Stress
    Yang, Linxiang
    Zhao, Peixian
    Song, Xiaobo
    Ma, Yongpeng
    Fan, Linyuan
    Xie, Meng
    Song, Zhilin
    Zhang, Xuexing
    Ma, Hong
    HORTICULTURAE, 2024, 10 (10)
  • [32] Morphological and physiological responses to cyclic drought in two contrasting genotypes of Catalpa bungei
    Zheng, Huifang
    Zhang, Xin
    Ma, Wenjun
    Song, Junyu
    Rahman, Siddiq Ur
    Wang, Junhui
    Zhang, Yi
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2017, 138 : 77 - 87
  • [33] Physiological responses of two contrasting watermelon genotypes exposed to drought and nitric oxide
    Hakki, Erdogan Esref
    Hamurcu, Mehmet
    Gezgin, Sait
    Demiral, Tijen
    JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2016, 231 : S25 - S25
  • [34] Biochemical and physiological responses of two grapevine rootstock genotypes to drought and salt treatments
    Meggio, F.
    Prinsi, B.
    Negri, A. S.
    Di Lorenzo, G. Simone
    Lucchini, G.
    Pitacco, A.
    Failla, O.
    Scienza, A.
    Cocucci, M.
    Espen, L.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GRAPE AND WINE RESEARCH, 2014, 20 (02) : 310 - 323
  • [35] Physiological and Biochemical Responses in Two Ornamental Shrubs to Drought Stress
    Toscano, Stefania
    Farieri, Elisa
    Ferrante, Antonio
    Romano, Daniela
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2016, 7
  • [36] Drought stress response in wheat: physiological and molecular analysis of resistant and sensitive genotypes
    Rampino, Patrizia
    Pataleo, Stefano
    Gerardi, Carmela
    Mita, Giovanni
    Perrotta, Carla
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 29 (12): : 2143 - 2152
  • [37] Physiological and Morphological Responses of two Quinoa Cultivars (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to Drought Stress; [Physiologische und morphologische Reaktionen zweier Quinoa-Sorten (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) auf Trockenstress]
    Issa Ali O.
    Fghire R.
    Anaya F.
    Benlhabib O.
    Wahbi S.
    Gesunde Pflanzen, 2019, 71 (2): : 123 - 133
  • [38] Effect of salinity on physiological, biochemical and photostabilizing attributes of two genotypes of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) exposed to arsenic stress
    Parvez, Shumaila
    Abbas, Ghulam
    Shahid, Muhammad
    Amjad, Muhammad
    Hussain, Munawar
    Asad, Saeed Ahmad
    Imran, Muhammad
    Naeem, Muhammad Asif
    ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2020, 187
  • [39] Non-targeted metabolomics analysis of metabolite changes in two quinoa genotypes under drought stress
    Xiaolin Zhu
    Mingjun Zhang
    Baoqiang Wang
    Xinrong Song
    Xian Wang
    Xiaohong Wei
    BMC Plant Biology, 23
  • [40] Non-targeted metabolomics analysis of metabolite changes in two quinoa genotypes under drought stress
    Zhu, Xiaolin
    Zhang, Mingjun
    Wang, Baoqiang
    Song, Xinrong
    Wang, Xian
    Wei, Xiaohong
    BMC PLANT BIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)