Application of the Staged Approach for Rehabilitation Classification System and Associated Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Rehabilitation for Shoulder Pain

被引:0
|
作者
Podschun, Laura [1 ]
Hill, Cheryl [2 ]
Kolber, Morey J. [2 ]
McClure, Philip [3 ]
机构
[1] AdventHealth Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Orlando, FL 32803 USA
[2] Nova Southeastern Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Ft Lauderdale, FL USA
[3] Arcadia Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Glenside, PA USA
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2024年 / 104卷 / 05期
关键词
Matched; Outcomes; Pain; Patients; Shoulder; STAR; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CLINICAL-PRACTICE-GUIDELINES; OF-FUNCT DISABILITY; PHYSICAL-THERAPY; INTERNATIONAL-CLASSIFICATION; ORTHOPEDIC-SECTION; RELIABILITY; HEALTH; QUICKDASH; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1093/ptj/pzae029
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective The Staged Approach for Rehabilitation Classification for the Shoulder (STAR-Shoulder) has been proposed as a model to guide management and improve outcomes for patients with shoulder pain; however, the effect of its utilization on patient outcomes has not been established. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to determine whether patient outcomes were improved if care was matched to the STAR-Shoulder system compared with unmatched care.Methods Collected and reviewed demographic, examination, and intervention data for all patients receiving physical therapist treatment for shoulder pain during a 1-year period within a single health care system. Outcome variables included the numeric pain rating scale, the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH), and the number of visits. Clinical records from patients receiving care at the discretion of the therapist were systematically audited to determine whether care provided was considered matched or unmatched.Results A total of 692 patient records were examined. The interrater reliability of classifying care as matched or unmatched was substantial (kappa = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.4 to 0.9), with 82% agreement. Changes in patient outcome scores were significantly better for those patients whose care matched the STAR-Shoulder system for pain changes (mean difference = -1.2; 95% CI = 0.8 to 1.6; effect size [d] = 0.5) and QuickDASH score (mean difference = 12.7; 95% CI = 9.9 to 15.5; d = 0.7). No difference was noted for number of visits.Conclusion The STAR-Shoulder system appears to be a meaningful way to classify patients and guide intervention to improve patient outcomes.Impact Application of the STAR-Shoulder system to help align physical therapist interventions more closely with tissue irritability and physical impairments appears to improve patient outcomes. These findings support this model as a promising approach to advance evidence-based practice for shoulder pain.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Telerehabilitation has similar clinical and patient-reported outcomes compared to traditional rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty
    LeBrun, Drake G.
    Martino, Brooks
    Biehl, Elizabeth
    Fisher, Charles M.
    Della Valle, Alejandro Gonzalez
    Ast, Michael P.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2022, 30 (12) : 4098 - 4103
  • [12] Use of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for Operative Shoulder Outcomes
    Schwarz, Ilona
    Smith, John-Rudolph H.
    Houck, Darby A.
    Frank, Rachel M.
    Bravman, Jonathan T.
    McCarty, Eric C.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (06)
  • [13] The responsiveness and interpretability of psychosocial patient-reported outcome measures in chronic musculoskeletal pain rehabilitation
    Pulles, Alexandra N. T. D.
    Koke, Albere J. A.
    Strackke, Robin P.
    Smeets, Rob J. E. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2020, 24 (01) : 134 - 144
  • [14] Longitudinal Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes From an Interdisciplinary Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation Program for Children With Chronic Migraine and Headache
    Benore, Ethan
    Webster, Erin E.
    Wang, Lu
    Banez, Gerard
    HEADACHE, 2018, 58 (10): : 1556 - 1567
  • [15] Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures used in rehabilitation of adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: A mapping review
    Koke, A. J. A.
    Bastiaenen, C. H. G.
    Kleijnen, J.
    Telgenkamp, I.
    Smeets, R. J. E. M.
    Beckers, L. W. M. E.
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2023, 36 (03) : 595 - 607
  • [16] Is obesity associated with worse patient-reported outcomes following lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions?
    Sielatycki, J. Alex
    Chotai, Silky
    Stonko, David
    Wick, Joseph
    Kay, Harrison
    McGirt, Matthew J.
    Devin, Clinton J.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (05) : 1627 - 1633
  • [17] Preoperative patient activation is predictive of improvements in patient-reported outcomes following minimally invasive lumbar decompression
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Parrish, James M.
    Mohan, Shruthi
    Geoghegan, Cara E.
    Jadczak, Caroline N.
    Hrynewycz, Nadia M.
    Singh, Kern
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 29 (09) : 2222 - 2230
  • [18] Association of Outpatient Cancer Rehabilitation With Patient-Reported Outcomes and Performance-Based Measures of Function
    Pergolotti, Mackenzi
    Covington, Kelley R.
    Lightner, Ashley N.
    Bertram, Jessica
    Thess, Melissa
    Sharp, Julia
    Spraker, Matthew
    Williams, Grant R.
    Manning, Peter
    REHABILITATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (03) : 137 - 142
  • [19] Scores and sores: Exploring patient-reported outcomes for knee evaluation in orthopaedics, sports medicine and rehabilitation
    Krolikowska, Aleksandra
    Reichert, Pawel
    Senorski, Eric Hamrin
    Karlsson, Jon
    Becker, Roland
    Prill, Robert
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2025, 33 (01) : 21 - 28
  • [20] Religiosity and Spirituality During Cardiac Rehabilitation A LONGITUDINAL EVALUATION OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES AND EXERCISE CAPACITY
    Trevino, Kelly M.
    McConnell, Timothy R.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOPULMONARY REHABILITATION AND PREVENTION, 2015, 35 (04) : 246 - 254