Bone reconstruction using CAD/CAM technology in head and neck surgical oncology. A narrative review of state of the art and aesthetic-functional outcomes

被引:2
作者
Copelli, Chiara [1 ]
Cacciatore, Federica [1 ]
Cocis, Stefan [1 ]
Maglitto, Fabio [1 ]
Barbara, Francesco [2 ]
Iocca, Oreste [3 ]
Manfuso, Alfonso [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Interdisciplinary Dept Med, Maxillofacial Surg, Bari, Italy
[2] Univ Hosp Policlin Bari, Dept Neurosci Sense Organs & Locomotor Syst, Otolaryngol, Bari, Italy
[3] Univ Turin, Dept Surg Sci, Maxillofacial Surg, Turin, Italy
关键词
head and neck reconstruction; microvascular surgery; free flaps; computer assisted surgery; 3D printing; CAD/CAM; MANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION; FLAP; SURGERY; PLATES;
D O I
10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-44-2024-N2819
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Bone defects following resections for head and neck tumours can cause significant functional and aesthetic defects. The choice of the optimal reconstructive method depends on several factors such as the size of the defect, location of the tumour, patient's health and surgeon's experience. The reconstructive gold standard is today represented by revascularised osteo-myocutaneous or osteomuscular flaps with osteosynthesis using titanium plates. Commonly used donor sites are the fibula, iliac crest, and lateral scapula/scapular angle. In recent years, computer -aided design (CAD)/computer assisted manufacturing (CAM) systems have revolutionised the reconstructive field, with the introduction of stereolithographic models, followed by virtual planning software and 3D printing of plates and prostheses. This technology has demonstrated excellent reliability in terms of accuracy, precision and predictability, leading to better operative outcomes, reduced surgical times and decreased complication rates. Among the disadvantages are high costs, implementation times and poor planning adaptability. These problems are finding a partial solution in the development of "in house" laboratories for planning and 3D printing. Strong indications for the use of CAD/CAM technologies today are the reconstruction of total or subtotal mandibular or maxillary defects and secondary bone reconstructions.
引用
收藏
页码:S58 / S66
页数:96
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   From bench to bedside - current clinical and translational challenges in fibula free flap reconstruction [J].
Baecher, Helena ;
Hoch, Cosima C. ;
Knoedler, Samuel ;
Maheta, Bhagvat J. ;
Kauke-Navarro, Martin ;
Safi, Ali-Farid ;
Alfertshofer, Michael ;
Knoedler, Leonard .
FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
[2]   Contemporary reconstruction of the mandible [J].
Bak, Mathew ;
Jacobson, Adam S. ;
Buchbinder, Daniel ;
Urken, Mark L. .
ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 46 (02) :71-76
[3]  
Bolzoni A, 2015, ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGO, V35, P371, DOI 10.14639/0392-100X-504
[4]   Long-Term Operative Outcomes of Preoperative Computed Tomography-Guided Virtual Surgical Planning for Osteocutaneous Free Flap Mandible Reconstruction [J].
Chang, Eric I. ;
Jenkins, Matthew P. ;
Patel, Sameer A. ;
Topham, Neal S. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 137 (02) :619-623
[5]   Mandibular rehabilitation: From the Andy Gump deformity to jaw-in-a-day [J].
Lilly, Gabriela L. ;
Petrisor, Daniel ;
Wax, Mark K. .
LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 6 (04) :708-720
[6]   CAD-CAM vs conventional technique for mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap: A comparison of outcomes [J].
Mahendru, Sanjay ;
Jain, Rahul ;
Aggarwal, Aditya ;
Aulakh, Hardeep S. ;
Jain, Ankit ;
Khazanchi, Rakesh K. ;
Sarin, Deepak .
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2020, 34 :284-291
[7]   Short- and long-term outcomes of three-dimensional printed surgical guides and virtual surgical planning versus conventional methods for fibula free flap reconstruction of the mandible: Decreased nonunion and complication rates [J].
May, Matthew M. ;
Howe, Benjamin M. ;
O'Byrne, Thomas J. ;
Alexander, Amy E. ;
Morris, Jonathon M. ;
Moore, Eric J. ;
Kasperbauer, Jan L. ;
Janus, Jeffrey R. ;
Van Abel, Kathryn M. ;
Dickens, Hunter J. ;
Price, Daniel L. .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2021, 43 (08) :2342-2352
[8]   Time and cost-analysis of virtual surgical planning for head and neck reconstruction: A matched pair analysis [J].
Mazzola, Francesco ;
Smithers, Fiona ;
Cheng, Kai ;
Mukherjee, Payal ;
Low, Tsu-Hui ;
Ch'ng, Sydney ;
Palme, Carsten E. ;
Clark, Jonathan R. .
ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 100
[9]   Three-Dimensional Virtual Surgery Accuracy for Free Fibula Mandibular Reconstruction: Planned Versus Actual Results [J].
Metzler, Philipp ;
Geiger, Erik J. ;
Alcon, Andre ;
Ma, Xioayang ;
Steinbacher, Derek M. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 72 (12) :2601-2612
[10]   3D-Printing Technologies for Craniofacial Rehabilitation, Reconstruction, and Regeneration [J].
Nyberg, Ethan L. ;
Farris, Ashley L. ;
Hung, Ben P. ;
Dias, Miguel ;
Garcia, Juan R. ;
Dorafshar, Amir H. ;
Grayson, Warren L. .
ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 45 (01) :45-57