Saved by the Moon: Imaginaries of Earthly Afterlife in Space

被引:0
|
作者
Krolokke, Charlotte [1 ]
Larsen, Jonas Holm [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Culture & Language, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
关键词
conservation; imaginaries; Lunar Ark; multiplanetary futures; social science of outer space; FUTURES; SCIENCE; SEEDS; MARS;
D O I
10.1177/01622439241255733
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Today, emergent space technology engages in visions of future off-world colonizing, while conservation technology is employed in ensuring the continuation of life on earth. In this article, we combine social science of outer space literature with biodiversity conservation work to analyze how utopian visions of off-world futures and dystopian visions of earth entangle in technoscientific future-making practices. Our case is the Lunar Ark, which is a proposed technoscientific project for a conservation base to be assembled inside the moon's lava tubes comprising samples of the earth's ecosystems. We investigate two interwoven imaginaries involving an imaginary of the Lunar Ark as a "reseeding of earth" and secondly, an imaginary in which the Lunar Ark becomes a platform for "escaping earth." Based on scientific papers, web material, news articles, an interview with the head of the research group, and ethnographic observations, we conclude that the Lunar Ark engages with a speculative bioeconomy, wherein earth is imagined as an unstable and unfit protector of life. In contrast, the Lunar Ark emerges as a pan-humanitarian and maternal-like technoscientific environment.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Earthly entanglements with outer space: Introduction to the theme issue
    Armstrong, Eleanor S.
    Klinger, Julie Michelle
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING D-SOCIETY & SPACE, 2025,
  • [2] Troubled Orbits and Earthly Concerns: Space Debris as a Boundary Infrastructure
    Clormann, Michael
    Klimburg-Witjes, Nina
    SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2022, 47 (05) : 960 - 985
  • [3] The Moon Village and Space 4.0: The 'Open Concept' as a New Way of Doing Space?
    Athanasopoulos, Harald Kopping
    SPACE POLICY, 2019, 49
  • [4] Space solar power satellite for the Moon and Mars mission
    Baraskar, Aditya
    Yoshimura, Yasuhiro
    Nagasaki, Shuji
    Hanada, Toshiya
    JOURNAL OF SPACE SAFETY ENGINEERING, 2022, 9 (01): : 96 - 105
  • [5] Fund Me to the Moon: Crowdfunding and the New Space Economy
    Pomeroy, Caleb
    Calzada-Diaz, Abigail
    Bielicki, Damian
    SPACE POLICY, 2019, 47 : 44 - 50
  • [6] Re-imagining the space age: Early satellite development from Earthly fieldwork practice
    Cirac-Claveras, Gemma
    SCIENCE AS CULTURE, 2022, 31 (02) : 163 - 186
  • [7] Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Techno-Optimism: Examining Outer Space Utopias of Silicon Valley
    Tutton, Richard
    SCIENCE AS CULTURE, 2021, 30 (03) : 416 - 439
  • [8] Making Mars resonate: the role of analogue sites in territorializing China's outer space imaginaries
    Puente-Lozano, Paloma
    Herring-Bazo, Alexia
    TERRITORY POLITICS GOVERNANCE, 2024, 12 (01) : 132 - 152
  • [9] Imaginaries and Chilenization: Chilean State Agents and their Vision of the Andean Space and Population of the Tarapaca Province, Northern Chile 1880-1918
    Castro Castro, Luis
    ANUARIO DE ESTUDIOS AMERICANOS, 2014, 71 (02) : 661 - 690
  • [10] Long term variations of galactic cosmic radiation on board the International Space Station, on the Moon and on the surface of Mars
    Berger, Thomas
    Matthiae, Daniel
    Burmeister, Soenke
    Zeitlin, Cary
    Rios, Ryan
    Stoffle, Nicholas
    Schwadron, Nathan A.
    Spence, Harlan E.
    Hassler, Donald M.
    Ehresmann, Bent
    Wimmer-Schweingruber, Robert F.
    JOURNAL OF SPACE WEATHER AND SPACE CLIMATE, 2020, 10