Risk factors and risk stratification approaches for delirium screening: A Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines 2.0 systematic review

被引:1
作者
Seidenfeld, Justine [1 ,2 ,3 ,8 ]
Lee, Sangil [4 ]
Ragsdale, Luna [2 ,3 ]
Nickel, Christian H. [5 ]
Liu, Shan W. [6 ,7 ]
Kennedy, Maura [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Durham VA Hlth Care Syst, Ctr Innovat Accelerate Discovery & Practice Transf, Durham, NC USA
[2] Durham VA Hlth Care Syst, Dept Emergency Med, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Durham, NC USA
[4] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Dept Emergency Med, Iowa City, IA USA
[5] Univ Basel, Univ Basel Hosp, Emergency Dept, Basel, Switzerland
[6] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Boston, MA USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Emergency Med, Boston, MA USA
[8] Durham VA Hlth Care Syst, ADAPT, 411 W Chapel Hill St, Durham, NC 27701 USA
关键词
CONFUSION ASSESSMENT METHOD; LENGTH-OF-STAY; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; OLDER-ADULTS; CARE; VALIDATION; RECOGNITION; RELIABILITY; DEMENTIA; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1111/acem.14939
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: As part of the Geriatric Emergency Department (ED) Guidelines 2.0 project, we conducted a systematic review to find risk factors or risk stratification approaches that can be used to identify subsets of older adults who may benefit from targeted ED delirium screening. Methods: An electronic search strategy was developed with a medical librarian, conducted in April 2021 and November 2022. Full-text studies of patients >= 65 years assessed for prevalent delirium in the ED were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the McMaster University Clarity Group tool. Outcomes measures pertained to the risk stratification method used. Due to heterogeneity of patient populations, risk stratification methods, and outcomes, a meta-analysis was not conducted. Results: Our search yielded 1878 unique citations, of which 13 were included. Six studies developed a novel delirium risk score with or without evaluation of specific risk factors, six studies evaluated specific risk factors only, and one study evaluated an existing nondelirium risk score for association with delirium. The most common risk factor was history of dementia, with odds ratios ranging from 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-8.9) to 18.33 (95% CI 8.08-43.64). Other risk factors that were consistently associated with increased risk of delirium included older age, use of certain medications (such as antipsychotics, antidepressants, and opioids, among others), and functional impairments. Of the studies that developed novel risk scores, the reported area under the curve ranged from 0.77 to 0.90. Only two studies reported potential impact of the risk stratification tool on screening burden. Conclusions: There is significant heterogeneity, but results suggest that factors such as dementia, age over 75, and functional impairments should be used to identify older adults who are at highest risk for ED delirium. No studies evaluated implementation of a risk stratification method for delirium screening or evaluated patient-oriented outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:969 / 984
页数:16
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Prognostic Value and Risk Factors of Delirium in Emergency Patients With Decompensated Heart Failure
    Alberto Rizzi, Miguel
    Torres Bonafonte, Olga Herminia
    Alquezar, Aitor
    Herrera Mateo, Sergio
    Pinera, Pascual
    Puig, Mireia
    Benito, Salvador
    Ruiz, Domingo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2015, 16 (09) : 799.e1 - 799.e6
  • [2] Barriers to completing the 4AT for delirium and its clinical implementation in two hospitals: a mixed-methods study
    Alhaidari, Abdullah A. O.
    Matsis, Kyriakos P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2022, 13 (01) : 163 - 172
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, Annals of emergency medicine, V63, pe7, DOI [10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.02.008, DOI 10.1016/J.ANNEMERGMED.2014.02.008]
  • [4] Predictors of delirium in older patients at the emergency department: a prospective multicentre derivation study
    Beland, Emmanuelle
    Nadeau, Alexandra
    Carmichael, Pierre-Hugues
    Boucher, Valerie
    Voyer, Philippe
    Pelletier, Mathieu
    Gouin, Emilie
    Daoust, Raoul
    Berthelot, Simon
    Lamontagne, Marie-Eve
    Morin, Michele
    Lemire, Stephane
    Thien Tuong Minh Vu
    Emond, Marcel
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 23 (03) : 330 - 336
  • [5] Validation of the 4AT, a new instrument for rapid delirium screening: a study in 234 hospitalised older people
    Bellelli, Giuseppe
    Morandi, Alessandro
    Davis, Daniel H. J.
    Mazzola, Paolo
    Turco, Renato
    Gentile, Simona
    Ryan, Tracy
    Cash, Helen
    Guerini, Fabio
    Torpilliesi, Tiziana
    Del Santo, Francesco
    Trabucchi, Marco
    Annoni, Giorgio
    Maclullich, Alasdair M. J.
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2014, 43 (04) : 496 - 502
  • [6] Billig AE, 2022, REV BRAS ENFERM, V75
  • [7] Length of Stay in the Emergency Department and Occurrence of Delirium in Older Medical Patients
    Bo, Mario
    Bonetto, Martina
    Bottignole, Giuliana
    Porrino, Paola
    Coppo, Eleonora
    Tibaldi, Michela
    Ceci, Giacomo
    Raspo, Silvio
    Cappa, Giorgetta
    Bellelli, Giuseppe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2016, 64 (05) : 1114 - 1119
  • [8] Predicting incident delirium diagnoses using data from primary-care electronic health records
    Bowman, Kirsty
    Jones, Lindsay
    Masoli, Jane
    Mujica-Mota, Ruben
    Strain, David
    Butchart, Joe
    Valderas, Jose M.
    Fortinsky, Richard H.
    Melzer, David
    Delgado, Joao
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2020, 49 (03) : 374 - 381
  • [9] Cairns C, 2023, NATL HOSP AMBULATORY
  • [10] Delirium detection in the emergency department: A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and screening instruments
    Carpenter, Christopher R.
    Lee, Sangil
    Kennedy, Maura
    Arendts, Glenn
    Schnitker, Linda
    Eagles, Debra
    Mooijaart, Simon
    Fowler, Susan
    Doering, Michelle
    LaMantia, Michael A.
    Han, Jin H.
    Liu, Shan W.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 31 (10) : 1014 - 1036