Techno-economic study and process simulation for a small-scale hydrogen production plant based on ammonia decomposition

被引:2
作者
El-Shafie, Mostafa [1 ]
Kambara, Shinji [1 ]
Katikaneni, Sai P. [2 ]
Paglieri, Stephen N. [2 ]
Lee, Kunho [2 ]
机构
[1] Gifu Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Environm & Renewable Energy Syst Div, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 5011193, Japan
[2] Saudi Aramco, Res & Dev Ctr, Carbon Management R&D Div, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Hydrogen separation; Membrane reactor; Energy efficiency; Permeation rate; Ammonia synthesis; Hydrogen cost; COMMERCIAL RU/AL2O3 CATALYST; MEMBRANE REACTOR; MICROCHANNEL REACTOR; NH3; DECOMPOSITION; RECENT PROGRESS; FUEL; STORAGE; ENERGY; COST; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.03.304
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Hydrogen is a carbon-free fuel and can be expected to play a significant role in the global clean energy transition. In this study, two proposed small-scale hydrogen production plant configurations were designed and simulated for high-purity hydrogen production at a rate of 25 kgH2/day. The feasibility and economic viability of the proposed plant configurations were examined. Additionally, the performance and sensitivity analysis were assessed under different operating conditions. Configuration A proposed to use two reactors for ammonia cracking and H2 separation, respectively. Configuration B considers that the decomposition of ammonia and H2 separation simultaneously occurs in a single integrated reactor. Despite the configuration B was more energy efficient than configuration A but both configurations are applicable. The total H2 production cost of configuration A was 6.39 $/kgH2 and that of configuration B was 6.06 $/kgH2. Since the proposed plant configurations generated both hydrogen and nitrogen, the total cost of production was distributed between them. Therefore, the final H2 and N2 separation costs of configuration A was 5.05 $/kgH2 and 1.14 $/kgN2, and configuration B was 4.72 $/kgH2 and 1.08 $/kgN2. The hydrogen production cost from different ammonia synthesis pathways was compared. The technology readiness level (TRL) for hydrogen production from ammonia cracking was assessed and identified at a range of TRL 4-6. It can also be considered that the ammonia synthesis pathway controlled the ammonia prices and subsequently the hydrogen production cost.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 141
页数:16
相关论文
共 125 条
  • [1] Hydrogen energy, economy and storage: Review and recommendation
    Abe, J. O.
    Popoola, A. P. I.
    Ajenifuja, E.
    Popoola, O. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (29) : 15072 - 15086
  • [2] Assessing risks for New England's wholesale electricity market from wind power losses during extreme winter storms
    Akdemir, Kerem Ziya
    Kern, Jordan D.
    Lamontagne, Jonathan
    [J]. ENERGY, 2022, 251
  • [3] Akhtar MS, 2021, Study, P141, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-323-88506-5.50023-1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-323-88506-5.50023-1]
  • [4] Analysis of ammonia decomposition reactor to generate hydrogen for fuel cell applications
    Alagharu, Vyjayanthi
    Palanki, Srinivas
    West, Kevin N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2010, 195 (03) : 829 - 833
  • [5] A shock-tube study of NH3 and NH3/H-2 oxidation using laser absorption of NH3 and H2O
    Alturaifi, Sulaiman A.
    Mathieu, Olivier
    Petersen, Eric L.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2023, 39 (01) : 233 - 241
  • [6] Hydrogen production through renewable and non-renewable energy processes and their impact on climate change
    Amin, Muhammad
    Shah, Hamad Hussain
    Fareed, Anaiz Gul
    Khan, Wasim Ullah
    Chung, Eunhyea
    Zia, Adeel
    Farooqi, Zia Ur Rahman
    Lee, Chaehyeon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (77) : 33112 - 33134
  • [7] Anantharaman RBOBNVDESFEFFMEMGNDPAPMRS& RL, 2018, Cesar deliverable D2.4.3. European best practice guidelines for assessment of CO2 capture technologies
  • [8] Large-scale storage of hydrogen
    Andersson, Joakim
    Gronkvist, Stefan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (23) : 11901 - 11919
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2020, CHEMCAD version 7.1 by chemstations
  • [10] [Anonymous], TECHNOLOGY READINESS