Response to von Schmalensee et al.

被引：0

作者：

Garcia-Costoya, Guillermo ^{[1
]}

Williams, Claire E. ^{[1
]}

Faske, Trevor M. ^{[1
]}

Moorman, Jacob D. ^{[2
]}

Logan, Michael L. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Nevada Reno, Reno, NV 89557 USA

[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA

来源：

ECOLOGY LETTERS | 2024年 / 27卷 / 06期

关键词：

climate change; evolutionary constraints; extinction risk; genetic correlations; thermal physiology;

D O I：

10.1111/ele.14436

中图分类号：

Q14 [生态学（生物生态学）];

学科分类号：

071012 ; 0713 ;

摘要：

Von Schmalensee et al. present two concerns about our study. While the first stems from a general disagreement about our simulation methodology, the second is a useful observation of a modelling choice we made that affected simulation outcomes, but in ways that do not invalidate our original conclusions. Von Schmalensee et al. present two concerns about our study. While the first stems from a general disagreement about our simulation methodology, the second is a useful observation of a modelling choice we made that affected simulation outcomes, but in ways that do not invalidate our original conclusions.image

引用

页数：4

共 50 条

[1] A downside of diversity? A response to Gallagher et al.
Stroud, James T.
Feeley, Kenneth J.
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2015, 30 (06) : 296 - 297
[2] Accommodating the human response for realistic adaptation planning: response to Gillson et al.
Watson, James E. M.
Segan, Daniel B.
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2013, 28 (10) : 573 - 574
[3] Reply to response to Dyck et al. (2007) on polar bears and climate change in western Hudson Bay by Stirling et al. (2008)
Dyck, M. G.
Soon, W.
Baydack, R. K.
Legates, D. R.
Baliunas, S.
Ball, T. F.
Hancock, L. O.
ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2008, 5 (04) : 289 - 302
[4] Venting and leaking of methane from shale gas development: response to Cathles et al.
Howarth, Robert W.
Santoro, Renee
Ingraffea, Anthony
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 113 (02) : 537 - 549
[5] Declaration of frogs' recovery ignores key data: A response to Woinarski et al. 2023
Parris, Kirsten M.
Heard, Geoffrey W.
McKnight, Donald T.
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2023, 283
[6] Unfulfilled promise of data-driven approaches: response to Peterson et al. 2016
Pimm, Stuart L.
Harris, Grant
Jenkins, Clinton N.
Ocampo-Penuela, Natalia
Li, Binbin V.
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2017, 31 (04) : 944 - 947
[7] Global patterns of the species richness and distribution of eriophyoid mites: a response to Li et al. 2023
Ozman-Sullivan, Sebahat K.
Sullivan, Gregory T.
JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2024, 51 (01) : 57 - 60
[8] Response to Guerin et al. Comment on 'Mapping the climate risk to urban forests at city scale'
Esperon-Rodriguez, Manuel
Gallagher, Rachael
Souverijns, Niels
Lejeune, Quentin
Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich
Tjoelker, Mark G.
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2025, 258
[9] The recent past is not a reliable guide to future climate impacts: Response to Caro et al. (2022)
Thierry, Aaron
Bullock, James M.
Gardner, Charlie J.
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2022, 15 (06):
[10] Response to Dyck et al. (2007) on polar bears and climate change in western Hudson Bay
Stirling, Ian
Derocher, Andrew E.
Gough, William A.
Rode, Karyn
ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2008, 5 (03) : 193 - 201

← 1 2 3 4 5 →