Neonatal Outcomes of Infants Diagnosed with Fetal Growth Restriction during Late Pregnancy versus after Birth

被引:1
|
作者
Houri, Ohad [1 ]
Yoskovitz, Meytal Schwartz [1 ]
Walfisch, Asnat [1 ]
Pardo, Anat [1 ]
Geron, Yossi [1 ]
Hadar, Eran [1 ]
Bardin, Ron [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, IL-6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
fetal growth restriction; adverse neonatal outcomes; GESTATIONAL-AGE FETUSES; RECOGNITION; TERM;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13133753
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the potential differences in the outcomes of neonates in whom FGR was diagnosed late in pregnancy as compared to those in whom growth restriction was diagnosed after birth. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary medical center between 2017 and 2019. The study included women carrying a single infant with an estimated fetal weight below the tenth percentile in whom FGR was diagnosed during late pregnancy, after 32 gestational weeks (known late-onset FGR; study group) or only after birth (unknown FGR; control group). Data were collected by review of the electronic health records. The primary outcome measure was the rate of composite adverse neonatal outcome. Results: A total of 328 women were included, 77 (23.47%) in the known-FGR group and 251 (75.53%) in the unknown-FGR group. In the known-FGR group, an etiology for the FGR was identified in 28.57% cases, most commonly placental insufficiency (21.74%). Compared to the unknown-FGR group, the known-FGR group was characterized by significantly higher rates of elective cesarean delivery (15.58% vs. 9.96%, p < 0.001), preterm birth (18.18% vs. 3.98%, p < 0.01), and labor induction (67.53% vs. 21.51%, p < 0.01). A significantly higher proportion of neonates in the known-FGR group had a positive composite adverse outcome (38.96% vs. 15.53%, p < 0.01). For multivariate regression analysis adjusted for maternal age, gestational age at delivery, and mode of delivery, there was no difference between groups in the primary outcome (aOR 1.73, CI 0.89-3.35, p = 0.1). Every additional gestational week at delivery was a protective factor (aOR = 0.7, 95% CI 0.56-0.86, p < 0.01). Conclusions: A prenatal diagnosis of late-onset FGR is associated with higher intervention and preterm birth rates as compared to a diagnosis made after birth. Fetuses diagnosed with late-onset FGR during pregnancy should undergo specific and personalized assessment to determine the cause and severity of the growth delay and the best management strategy. This study highlights the importance of careful decision-making regarding the induction of labor in late-onset FGR.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does detection of fetal growth restriction improve neonatal outcomes?
    Selvaratnam, Roshan J.
    Wallace, Euan M.
    Treleaven, Sophie
    Hooper, Stuart B.
    Davis, Peter G.
    Davey, Mary-Ann
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2021, 57 (05) : 677 - 683
  • [2] Obstetric and pediatric growth charts for the detection of late-onset fetal growth restriction and neonatal adverse outcomes
    Fernandez-Rodriguez, Beatriz
    de Alba, Concepcion
    Galindo, Alberto
    Recio, David
    Villalain, Cecilia
    Rosa Pallas, Carmen
    Herraiz, Ignacio
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (02) : 216 - 224
  • [3] Fetal and neonatal mortality in the postterm pregnancy: The impact of gestational age and fetal growth restriction
    Divon, MY
    Haglund, B
    Nisell, H
    Otterblad, PO
    Westgren, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 178 (04) : 726 - 731
  • [4] Dynamic Thiol/Disulfide Homeostasis in Predicting Adverse Neonatal Outcomes in Fetal Growth Restriction
    Ozler, Sibel
    Oztas, Efser
    Guler, Basak Gumus
    Erel, Ozcan
    Caglar, Ali Turhan
    Ergin, Merve
    Danisman, Nuri
    FETAL AND PEDIATRIC PATHOLOGY, 2020, 39 (02) : 132 - 144
  • [5] Relationship Between Adverse Neonatal Outcomes and Diastolic Deceleration Area on Fetal MCA Doppler in Patients with Late Fetal Growth Restriction
    Karabay, Gulsan
    Seyhanli, Zeynep
    Cakir, Betul Tokgoz
    Aktemur, Gizem
    Sucu, Serap Topkara
    Tonyali, Nazan Vanli
    Bucak, Mevlut
    Agaoglu, Recep Taha
    Filiz, Ahmet Arif
    Keskin, Huseyin Levent
    Karabay, Umut
    Aydogan, Seda
    Dagdeviren, Gulsah
    MEDICAL BULLETIN OF SISLI ETFAL HOSPITAL, 2025, 59 (01): : 119 - 126
  • [6] Intended delivery mode and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction
    Rodriguez-Sibaja, Maria J.
    Mendez-Pina, Miguel A.
    Lumbreras-Marquez, Mario I.
    Acevedo-Gallegos, Sandra
    Velazquez-Torres, Berenice
    Ramirez-Calvo, Jose A.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2023, 36 (02)
  • [7] Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes in Fetal Growth Restriction and Small for Gestational Age
    Lubrano, Chiara
    Taricco, Emanuela
    Coco, Chiara
    Di Domenico, Fiorenza
    Mando, Chiara
    Cetin, Irene
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (10)
  • [8] Pregnancy outcome after false diagnosis of fetal growth restriction
    Gabbay-Benziv, Rinat
    Aviram, Amir
    Hadar, Eran
    Chen, Rony
    Bardin, Ron
    Wiznitzer, Arnon
    Yogev, Yariv
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2017, 30 (16) : 1916 - 1919
  • [9] Effects of intrauterine growth restriction during late pregnancy on the ovine fetal renal function and antioxidant capacity
    Zi, Yang
    Ma, Chi
    Li, Huimin
    Shen, Suting
    Liu, Yingchun
    Li, Ming
    Gao, Feng
    ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2021, 92 (01)
  • [10] The role of different Doppler parameters in predicting adverse neonatal outcomes in fetuses with late-onset fetal growth restriction
    Yilmaz, Cahit
    Melekoglu, Rauf
    Ozdemir, Halis
    Yasar, Seyma
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 20 (02) : 86 - 96