The interpretation of policies in administrative law: the significance of audience

被引:0
|
作者
Mills, Alistair [1 ]
机构
[1] Magdalene Coll, Cambridge, England
关键词
public law; administrative law; policies; interpretation;
D O I
10.1017/lst.2023.32
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The interpretation of administrative policies is of great importance in contemporary public law. The correct approach to policy interpretation has, however, been subject to insufficient academic scrutiny. The effect of policies is to provide guidance: not only to decision-makers, but also to stakeholders in the decision. Obvious stakeholders include the applicant or the individual who is the subject of the administrative decision, but the scope of potential legitimate stakeholders may go far beyond this. In matters of general interest, the broader public may be guided by policy (for instance, whether to object to a proposal during a consultation exercise, or on what basis to object). When considering how policy should be interpreted, the court should have regard to the extent of the appropriate audience of the policy, specifically considering how the least expert reader of the policy would interpret it. This 'least expert reader principle' will assist in answering difficult questions, such as whether the court should have regard to the underlying evidence base when interpreting a policy. The courts should rely upon, and express their reasoning by reference to, the least expert reader principle, in order to increase the transparency of judgments in the field of policy interpretation.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 312
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Soft Law as a Source of Colombian Administrative Law
    Bustos Romero, Michel Federico
    PROLEGOMENOS-DERECHOS Y VALORES, 2019, 22 (44): : 35 - 48
  • [22] Administrative Law Challenges in Investor-State Arbitration
    Cucic, Vuk
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, 2024, 41 (05): : 623 - 646
  • [23] The Use of Analogy in the Administrative Law
    Kerestes, Tomaz
    Repas, Martina
    LEX LOCALIS-JOURNAL OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT, 2013, 11 (03): : 565 - 581
  • [24] The administrative justice in canon law
    Perlingeiro, Ricardo
    CONHECIMENTO & DIVERSIDADE, 2015, 7 (14): : 17 - 25
  • [25] The criterion of arbitrability in administrative law
    Ballesteros Panizo, Covadonga Isabel
    REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO ADMINISTRATIVO, 2020, (55):
  • [26] THE FLEXIBILITY RULE IN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
    Perry, Adam
    CAMBRIDGE LAW JOURNAL, 2017, 76 (02) : 375 - 398
  • [27] Vulnerability in (Dutch) Administrative Law
    Ranchordas, Sofia
    Spijkstra, Anne N.
    Wolswinkel, C. Johan
    TILBURG LAW REVIEW-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND EUROPEAN LAW, 2024, 29 (01): : 1 - 13
  • [28] The Method of Studying Administrative Law
    Xu, Xin
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMANITIES, ARTS AND LANGUAGE (HUMAL 2017), 2017, : 297 - 301
  • [29] Quo vadis administrative law?
    Vedinas, Verginia
    JURIDICAL TRIBUNE-TRIBUNA JURIDICA, 2018, 8 (02): : 390 - 397
  • [30] Administrative Law and Human Dignity
    Zanella Di Pietro, Maria Sylvia
    A&C-REVISTA DE DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO & CONSTITUCIONAL, 2013, 13 (52): : 13 - 33