Thirty-Day High-Grade Aortic Valve Block Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Discharged on Heart Rhythm Monitor

被引:0
作者
Alabdaljabar, Mohamad S. [1 ]
Elhadi, Mohamed [1 ]
Gulati, Rajiv [2 ]
Rihal, Charanjit S. [2 ]
Friedman, Paul A. [2 ]
Cha, Yong -Mei [2 ]
Eleid, Mackram F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Internal Med, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Rochester, MN USA
来源
STRUCTURAL HEART-THE JOURNAL OF THE HEART TEAM | 2024年 / 8卷 / 04期
关键词
Heart rhythm monitor; High grade AV block; MoMe; TAVR; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.shj.2024.100317
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Conduction disease is an important and common complication post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Previously, we developed a conduction disease risk stratification and management protocol post-TAVR. This study aims to evaluate high-grade aortic valve block (HAVB) incidence and risk factors in a large cohort undergoing ambulatory cardiac monitoring post-TAVR according to conduction risk grouping. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study evaluated all patients discharged on ambulatory cardiac monitoring between 2016 and 2021 and stratified them into 3 groups based on electrocardiogram predictors of HAVB risk (group 1 [low], group 2 [intermediate], and group 3 [high]). HAVB was defined as >= 2 consecutive nonconducted P waves in sinus rhythm or bradycardia <50 beats/minute with a fixed rate for atrial fibrillation/ flutter. Descriptive statistics were used to show the incidence and timeline, while logistic regression was utilized to evaluate predictors of HAVB. Results: Five hundred twenty-eight patients were included (median age 80 years [74-85]; 43.8% female). Fortyone patients (7.8%) developed HAVB during ambulatory monitoring (68% were asymptomatic). Over a median follow-up of 2 years (1.3-2.7), the overall mortality rate was 15.0% (30-day mortality rate of 0.57%, n = 3). Risk factors for HAVB were male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 2.46, p = 0.02, 95% CI = 1.21-5.43), baseline right bundle branch block (OR = 2.80, p = 0.01, 95% CI = 1.17-6.19), and post-TAVR QRS >150 ms (OR = 2.16, p = 0.03, 95% CI = 1.01-4.40). The negative predictive value for patients in groups 1 and 2 for 30-day HAVB was 95.0 and 93.8%, respectively. Conclusions: The risk of 30-day HAVB post-TAVR on ambulatory monitoring post-TAVR varies according to postTAVR electrocardiogram findings, and a 3-group algorithm effectively identifies groups with a low negative predictive value for HAVB.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation and Management of Heart Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Mazzella, Anthony J.
    Arora, Sameer
    Hendrickson, Michael J.
    Sanders, Mason
    Vavalle, John P.
    Gehi, Anil K.
    CARDIAC FAILURE REVIEW, 2021, 7
  • [22] Photon-counting Detector CT in Patients Pre- and Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    van der Bie, Judith
    Sharma, Simran P.
    van Straten, Marcel
    Bosa, Daniel
    Hirsch, Alexander
    Dijkshoorn, Marcel L.
    Adrichem, Rik
    van Mieghem, Nicolas M. D. A.
    Budde, Ricardo P. J.
    RADIOLOGY-CARDIOTHORACIC IMAGING, 2023, 5 (02):
  • [23] Recovery of atrioventricular conduction in patients with heart block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Raelson, Colin A.
    Gabriels, James
    Ruan, Jonathan
    Ip, James E.
    Thomas, George
    Liu, Christopher F.
    Cheung, Jim W.
    Lerman, Bruce B.
    Patel, Apoor
    Markowitz, Steven M.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 28 (10) : 1196 - 1202
  • [24] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Multivalvular Heart Disease
    Khan, Faisal
    Okuno, Taishi
    Malebranche, Daniel
    Lanz, Jonas
    Praz, Fabien
    Stortecky, Stefan
    Windecker, Stephan
    Pilgrim, Thomas
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 13 (13) : E126 - 1514
  • [25] Feasibility and Safety of Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Coronary Revascularization Guided by Stress Cardiac Imaging
    Leclercq, Florence
    Akodad, Mariama
    Prunet, Elvira
    Huet, Fabien
    Meunier, Pierre-Alain
    Manna, Francois
    Macia, Jean-Christophe
    Robert, Pierre
    Steinecker, Matthieu
    Berdeu, Jean-Michel
    Schmutz, Laurent
    Gandet, Thomas
    Roubille, Francois
    Cayla, Guillaume
    Mariano-Goulart, Denis
    Lattuca, Benoit
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (19)
  • [26] Prognosis and Predictor Factors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Analysis of the Post-Transcatheter Aortic Replacement Clairval Hospital Registry
    Panagides, Vassili
    Sakka, Emna
    Cheneau, Edouard
    Bouharaoua, Ahmed
    Vicat, Jacques
    Leude-Vaillant, Elisabeth
    Rochas, Philippe
    Collet, Frederic
    Giacomoni, Marie-Paule
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (11)
  • [27] 3-Year Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Restenosis: A Rare Complication
    Orabueze, Ijeoma
    Ogunleye, Olushola
    Harrison, Mark
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [28] Costs and outcomes of mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry monitoring post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Mohr, Belinda A.
    Wadhwa, Manish
    Medic, Goran
    Lavelle, Jennifer
    Buchenberger, J. Daniel
    Norlock, Vincent
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (14) : 1045 - 1055
  • [29] Acute Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Ischemic Strokes Are Not Always Related to Intraprocedural Embolization
    Alkhouli, Mohamad
    Tarabishy, Abdul
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (13) : E107 - E109
  • [30] Late Presentation of Left Main Coronary Artery Impingement Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Lugomirski, Peter
    McArdle, Brian
    Alak, Aiman
    Dick, Alexander
    Labinaz, Marino
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (10) : E159 - E160