Staged Mastopexy before Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Improving Safety and Appearance in Breast Reconstruction

被引:7
作者
Awaida, Cyril J. [1 ]
Bernier, Christina [1 ]
Bou-Merhi, Joseph S. [1 ]
Trabelsi, Nadia O. [2 ]
Gagnon, Alain [1 ]
El-Khatib, Arij [1 ]
Harris, Patrick G. [1 ]
Odobescu, Andrei [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal Hosp Ctr, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Texas Southwestern, Dept Plast Surg, 1801 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
IMPLANT RECONSTRUCTION; REDUCTION MAMMAPLASTY; PTOTIC BREAST; CANCER; FLAP; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000010823
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) in patients with large or ptotic breasts remains challenging because of the risk of ischemic complications and the difficulty in managing the redundant skin envelope. Staged mastopexy or breast reduction before the mastectomy/reconstruction has been shown to decrease the risk of complications and improve clinical outcomes.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with a genetic predisposition to breast cancer who underwent staged breast reduction/mastopexy before NSM and reconstruction in the authors' institution. In patients with in situ disease or invasive cancer, the first stage consisted of lumpectomy and oncoplastic reduction/mastopexy. Breast reconstruction at the second stage was performed with free abdominal flaps or breast implants and acellular dermal matrix. Data regarding the ischemic complications were recorded.Results:In total, 47 patients (84 breasts) underwent this staged approach. All patients had a genetic predisposition to breast cancer. The time interval between the two stages was 11.5 months (range, 1.3 to 23.6 months). Twelve breasts (14.3%) were reconstructed with free abdominal flaps, six (7.1%) with tissue expanders, and 66 (78.6%) with permanent subpectoral implants and acellular dermal matrix. There was one case of postoperative superficial nipple-areola complex epidermolysis (1.2%), and two cases of partial mastectomy skin flap necrosis (2.4%). The mean follow-up time after completion of reconstruction was 8.3 months.Conclusion:Mastopexy or breast reduction before NSM and reconstruction is a safe procedure with a low risk of ischemic complications.CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic, IV.
引用
收藏
页码:864e / 872e
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   One-Staged Silicone Implant Breast Reconstruction Following Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients at High Risk for Breast Cancer [J].
Atiyeh, Bishara ;
Zgheib, Elias ;
Sadigh, Parviz .
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 37 (05) :1063-1065
[32]   Oncologic outcomes and radiation safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy with intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer [J].
Pan, Lingxiao ;
Ye, Changsheng ;
Chen, Lun ;
Tang, Wei ;
Zhang, Xiaoshen ;
Gao, Jin ;
Wu, Rui ;
Ye, Xigang ;
Tan, Weige ;
Wan, Minghui ;
Zheng, Wenbo .
BREAST CANCER, 2019, 26 (05) :618-627
[33]   Surgical and oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in an Asian population [J].
Ng, Yvonne Ying-Ru ;
Tan, Veronique Kiak-Mien ;
Pek, Wan Sze ;
Chang, Jasmine Hui-Er ;
Sim, Yirong ;
Ong, Kong Wee ;
Yong, Wei Sean ;
Madhukumar, Preetha ;
Wong, Chow Yin ;
Ong, Yee Siang ;
Tan, Bien Keem ;
Tan, Benita Kiat Tee .
BREAST CANCER, 2019, 26 (02) :165-171
[34]   A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Conventional Mastectomy with Reconstruction [J].
Romanoff, Anya ;
Zabor, Emily C. ;
Stempel, Michelle ;
Sacchini, Virgilio ;
Pusic, Andrea ;
Morrow, Monica .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (10) :2909-2916
[35]   Oncologic Safety of Staged Prepectoral Implant Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Mean 9-Year Follow-Up [J].
Salibian, Arthur H. ;
Harness, Jay K. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 150 (03) :513-522
[36]   Increasing Eligibility for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy [J].
Suzanne B. Coopey ;
Rong Tang ;
Lan Lei ;
Phoebe E. Freer ;
Kari Kansal ;
Amy S. Colwell ;
Michele A. Gadd ;
Michelle C. Specht ;
William G. Austen ;
Barbara L. Smith .
Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2013, 20 :3218-3222
[37]   Breast-Specific Sensuality and Appearance Satisfaction: Comparison of Breast-Conserving Surgery and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy [J].
Casaubon, Jesse T. ;
Kuehn, Reed B. ;
Pesek, Sarah E. ;
Raker, Christina A. ;
Edmonson, David A. ;
Stuckey, Ashley ;
Gass, Jennifer S. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2020, 230 (06) :990-998
[38]   Bipedicled Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Traditional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Comparison of 2 Alternative Techniques in Order to Save Nipple-Areola Complex [J].
Falco, Giuseppe ;
Curcio, Annalisa ;
Marongiu, Francesco ;
Buggi, Federico ;
Mingozzi, Matteo ;
Mele, Simone ;
Ferrari, Guglielmo ;
Folli, Secondo .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 84 (04) :366-374
[39]   Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Recurrence From Previous Breast Conservation Therapy [J].
Lee, Che-Hsiung ;
Cheng, Ming-Huei ;
Wu, Chih-Wei ;
Kuo, Wen-Ling ;
Yu, Chi-Chang ;
Huang, Jung-Ju .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 82 :S95-S102
[40]   Beyond Quantitative Measurement of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes: Evaluation of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and the Breast-Q [J].
Wommack, Christel C. ;
Spiegel, Aldona J. .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (01) :7-9