Correlation analysis of evaluation methods and indicators for low-temperature performance of epoxy asphalt

Selecting an epoxy asphalt (EA) material with excellent low-temperature performance is a challenging task due to that the traditional test methods and indicators for thermoplastic asphalt may not be appropriate for thermosetting EA, and the binders ' low-temperature performance does not always match that of mixtures. The primary purpose of this study is to determine the appropriate low-temperature evaluation methods and indexes of EA materials and the correlation between the low-temperature performance of EA binder and EA mixture (EAM). First, the low-temperature performance of four EA binders was analyzed using tensile, bending beam rheometer (BBR), and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) tests. Then, the low-temperature cracking resistance of the EAMs was evaluated through beam bending and semi-circular bend (SCB) tests. Finally, Pearson correlation analysis was performed separately on the low-temperature indicators of EA binders and EAMs. Moreover, the Grey correlation analysis was employed to determine the correlation between the low-temperature properties of the two. The results showed that the correlation between fracture elongation ( epsilon ) and other test indicators was not significant. The multiple indicators of the BBR, such as viscoelastic parameters, viscous deformation ratio ( J R ), along with the glass transition temperature ( T g ) of the DMA, showed consistent evaluation results for the low-temperature performance of the four EA binders. However, the correlation of these indicators with the cracking resistance of the EAM was notably different. The flexural strain energy density of the beam bending test and SCB fracture energies demonstrated excellent correlation. The grey correlation analysis results of these two indicators as reference series were highly similar. Specifically, the novel J R in this study and the T g exhibited a better correlation with the low-temperature cracking resistance of EAM. These two indicators were preferentially recommended for the evaluation of the low-temperature performance of EA and the prediction of the lowtemperature cracking resistance of EAM.