Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Stage I Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

被引:2
|
作者
Song, Bonnie B.
Anderson, Zachary S.
Masjedi, Aaron D.
Lee, Matthew W.
Mandelbaum, Rachel S.
Klar, Maximilian
Roman, Lynda D.
Wright, Jason D.
Matsuo, Koji
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Div Gynecol Oncol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Norris Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Freiburg, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Freiburg, Germany
[5] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, New York, NY USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2024年 / 144卷 / 01期
关键词
PRESERVATION; POPULATION; OUTCOMES; WOMEN; REGRESSION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000005530
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To describe population-level utilization of fertility-sparing surgery and outcome of reproductive-aged patients with early epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent fertility-sparing surgery in the United States. METHODS: This retrospective study queried the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program. The study included 3,027 patients younger than age 50 years with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer receiving primary surgical therapy from 2007 to 2020. Fertility-sparing surgery was defined as preservation of one ovary and the uterus for unilateral lesion and preservation of the uterus for bilateral lesions. Temporal trend of fertility-sparing surgery was assessed with linear segmented regression with log-transformation. Overall survival associated with fertility-sparing surgery was assessed with Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: A total of 534 patients (17.6%) underwent fertility-sparing surgery. At the cohort level, the utilization of fertility-sparing surgery was 13.4% in 2007 and 21.8% in 2020 (P for trend=.009). Non-Hispanic White individuals (2.8-fold), those with high-grade serous histology (2.2-fold), and individuals with stage IC disease (2.3-fold) had a more than twofold increase in fertility-sparing surgery utilization during the study period (all P for trend<.05). After controlling for the measured clinicopathologic characteristics, patients who received fertility-sparing surgery had overall survival comparable with that of patients who had nonsparing surgery (5-year rates 93.6% vs 92.1%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.87, 95% CI, 0.57-1.35). This survival association was consistent in high-grade serous (5-year rates 92.9% vs 92.4%), low-grade serous (100% vs 92.2%), clear cell (97.5% vs 86.1%), mucinous (92.1% vs 86.6%), low-grade endometrioid (95.7% vs 97.7%), and mixed (93.3% vs 83.7%) histology (all P>.05). In high-grade endometrioid tumor, fertility-sparing surgery was associated with decreased overall survival (5-year rates 71.9% vs 93.8%, adjusted hazard ratio 2.90, 95% CI, 1.09-7.67). Among bilateral ovarian lesions, fertility-sparing surgery was not associated with overall survival (5-year rates 95.8% vs 92.5%, P=.364). Among 41,914 patients who had epithelial ovarian cancer with any age and stage, those younger than age 50 years with stage I disease increased from 8.6% to 10.9% during the study period (P for trend=.002). CONCLUSION: Nearly one in five reproductive-aged patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer underwent fertility-sparing surgery in recent years in the United States. More than 90% of reproductive-aged patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent fertility-sparing surgery were alive at the 5-year timepoint, except for those with high-grade endometrioid tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 78
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Oncologic and obstetric outcomes of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery: A retrospective study
    Ayhan, Ali
    Tunc, Mehmet
    Atasoy Karakas, Latife
    Tekelioglu, Tugba
    Haberal Reyhan, Asuman Nihan
    Onalan, Goegsen
    Kuscu, Esra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 162 (02) : 711 - 717
  • [43] Fertility-sparing surgery for patients with stage IC2 or IC3 epithelial ovarian carcinoma: any evidence of safety?
    Nasioudis, Dimitrios
    Heyward, Quetrell D.
    Ko, Emily M.
    Haggerty, Ashley F.
    Cory, Lori
    Giuntoli, Robert L., II
    Kim, Sarah H.
    Latif, Nawar A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2022, 32 (02) : 165 - 171
  • [44] Surgical management of borderline ovarian tumors: The role of fertility-sparing surgery
    Park, Jeong-Yeol
    Kim, Dae-Yeon
    Kim, Jong-Hyeok
    Kim, Yong-Man
    Kim, Young-Tak
    Nam, Joo-Hyun
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 113 (01) : 75 - 82
  • [45] Recurrence-predicting prognostic factors for patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing fertility-sparing surgery: a multi-institutional study
    Kajiyama, Hiroaki
    Mizuno, Mika
    Shibata, Kiyosumi
    Yamamoto, Eiko
    Kawai, Michiyasu
    Nagasaka, Tetsuro
    Kikkawa, Fumitaka
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2014, 175 : 97 - 102
  • [46] Fertility-sparing in cancer patients
    Karakas, Sema
    Kaya, Cihan
    Schafer, Sebastian Daniel
    Mikus, Mislav
    Terzic, Milan
    Abdullaev, Bekhzod
    Andrisani, Alessandra
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 48 (04): : 787 - 794
  • [47] Fertility-sparing surgery in patients with cervical cancer
    Rob, Lukas
    Skapa, Petr
    Robova, Helena
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2011, 12 (02): : 192 - 200
  • [48] Clinical outcomes of fertility-sparing treatments in young patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma
    Hu, Jun
    Zhu, Li-rong
    Liang, Zhi-qing
    Meng, Yuan-guang
    Guo, Hong-yan
    Qu, Peng-peng
    Ma, Cai-ling
    Xu, Cong-jian
    Yuan, Bi-bo
    JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B, 2011, 12 (10): : 787 - 795
  • [49] Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Patients Oncologic and Reproductive Outcomes
    Ditto, Antonino
    Martinelli, Fabio
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Fischetti, Margherita
    Di Donato, Violante
    Lorusso, Domenica
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (03) : 493 - 497
  • [50] Management of pregnancy after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer
    Simjak, Patrik
    Cibula, David
    Parizek, Antonin
    Slama, Jiri
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2020, 99 (07) : 830 - 838