Enabling creativity: the interplay of participative leadership, coworkers' knowledge sharing behavior and employee's creative idea validation

被引:1
作者
Kumar, Nilesh [1 ]
Wang, Changfeng [2 ]
Liu, Zhiqiang [3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Normal Univ, Dept Psychol, Jinhua, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Normal Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Jinhua, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Management, Main Campus, Wuhan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Coworkers' knowledge-sharing behavior; Employees' creative-idea validation; Incremental creativity; Participative leadership; Radical creativity; MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY; OPEN INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE; CONTEXT; ROLES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1108/LODJ-09-2023-0501
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeBased on theory Z of leadership, this research aims to investigate the direct relationship between participative leadership (PL) and creative idea validation (CIV) fostering both radical (RC) and incremental creativity (IC). Additionally, by utilizing attribution theory, it explores the moderating effect of coworkers' knowledge-sharing behavior (KSB) on both the direct and indirect relationships.Design/methodology/approachData were collected through a descriptive approach and convenient sampling from three sources - leaders, subordinates and coworkers - in R&D departments at multi-levels within 97 high-tech firms in China. Data comprised 446 employees (subordinates and coworkers) and 94 leaders, and multilevel path analysis was conducted using Mplus software.FindingsThe results indicate that PL exhibits both a direct and indirect positive association with RC and IC through the CIV. Moreover, the relationship is enhanced by coworkers' high-KSB.Practical implicationsOur study offers implications that managers can leverage to foster employee creativity. Leaders are encouraged to embrace a PL style for collective idea validation. However, to overcome coworkers' reciprocal behavior, they may facilitate trust and team-building exercises, enabling employees to strengthen relationships and share critical information and knowledge resources for the development and validation.Originality/valueThis study is the first to empirically extend the relationship between PL and CIV, utilizing a multilevel approach to assess its impact on distinctive types of creativity - namely, radical and incremental. Further, it testifies the significance of coworkers' knowledge as an attribution effect influencing the relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:1011 / 1027
页数:17
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE AND CREATIVE IDEA VALIDATION: THE ROLE OF HELPING AND BULLYING
    Adeel, Ahmad
    Batool, Samreen
    Kee, Daisy Mui Hung
    Madni, Zain-ul-Abdeen
    Khan, Muhammad Kamran
    [J]. ASIAN ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2022, 27 (02) : 107 - 134
  • [2] Conflict side of creativity: Role of supervisory support and team affective tone in facilitating creative idea validation
    Adeel, Ahmad
    Kee, Daisy Mui Hung
    Daghriri, Yahya Qasim
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [3] Examining the Drivers and Performance Implications of Boundary Spanner Creativity
    Agnihotri, Raj
    Rapp, Adam A.
    Andzulis, James Mick
    Gabler, Colin B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SERVICE RESEARCH, 2014, 17 (02) : 164 - 181
  • [4] Amabile T. M., 1996, CREATIVITY CONTEXT U
  • [5] Arnold JA, 2000, J ORGAN BEHAV, V21, P249, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3<249::AID-JOB10>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-#
  • [7] How to enable employee creativity in a team context: A cross-level mediating process of transformational leadership
    Bai, Yuntao
    Lin, Li
    Li, Peter Ping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (09) : 3240 - 3250
  • [8] Bartol KM., 2002, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, V9, P64, DOI DOI 10.1177/107179190200900105
  • [9] Bass B.M., 2008, The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerialapplications, V4th
  • [10] Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations
    Becker, TE
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2005, 8 (03) : 274 - 289