ARE PHENOMENAL THEORIES OF THOUGHT CHAUVINISTIC?

被引：0

作者：

Lennon, Preston ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Rutgers State Univ, Ctr Cognit Sci, Psychol Bldg Addit,152 Frelinguysen Rd, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA

来源：

AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY | 2024年 / 61卷 / 03期

关键词：

conscious thought; cognitive phenomenology; chauvinism; phenomenal intentionality; UNCONSCIOUS THOUGHT; INTENTIONALITY; THINK;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

The phenomenal view of thought holds that thinking is an experience with phenomenal character that determines what the thought is about. This paper develops and responds to the objection that the phenomenal view is chauvinistic: it withholds thoughts from creatures that in fact have them. I develop four chauvinism objections to the phenomenal view-one from introspection, one from interpersonal differences, one from thought experiments, and one from the unconscious thought paradigm in psychology-and show that the phenomenal view can resist all four.

引用

页码：199 / 213

页数：15

共 47 条

[1]

Armstrong D.M., 1968, Analysis, V29, P48, DOI [10.2307/3327124, DOI 10.2307/3327124]

[2] UNCONSCIOUS THOUGHT THEORY AND ITS DISCONTENTS: A CRITIQUE OF THE CRITIQUES [J].

Bargh, John A. .

SOCIAL COGNITION, 2011, 29 (06) :629-647

[3]

Block Ned., 1996, Philosophical Issues, V20, P1

[4]

Carruthers P., 2011, Cognitive Phenomenology, P35, DOI [DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199579938.003.0002, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579938.003.0002]

[5]

Chalmers DJ., 1996, The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory

[6] The ins and outs of conscious belief [J].

Coleman, Sam .

PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2022, 179 (02) :517-548

[7]

Crane T., 2013, PHENOMENAL INTENTION, P156, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199764297.003.0009

[8]

Crane Tim., 2003, Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives, P33, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780199241286.003.0003

[9]

Crisp Roger., 2006, REASONS GOOD

[10] Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making [J].

Dijksterhuis, A .

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 87 (05) :586-598

← 1 2 3 4 5 →