This review provides a comparative analysis of visual outcomes and complications associated with three prominent refractive surgical techniques: intraocular collamer lens (ICL) implantation, small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Refractive surgeries aim to correct myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism, offering patients an alternative to corrective lenses. The review highlights the importance of comparing these procedures to guide clinical decision-making effectively. Each technique is described, emphasizing its unique advantages and considerations. While LASIK remains widely favored for its rapid visual recovery and high patient satisfaction, ICL is suitable for patients with higher refractive errors or corneal irregularities. Although relatively newer, SMILE shows promise with potential benefits such as corneal biomechanical stability and a reduced risk of dry eye syndrome. However, each procedure carries its distinct complications, reinforcing the need for personalized patient care and informed decision-making. Understanding these techniques' relative efficacy and safety profiles is essential for optimizing outcomes and enhancing patient satisfaction. Continued advancements in technology and surgical techniques promise further improvements in refractive surgery outcomes, underscoring the importance of ongoing research and innovation.
