Quantifying the Dosimetric Impact of Proton Range Uncertainties on RBE-Weighted Dose Distributions in Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Bilateral Head and Neck Cancer

被引:0
作者
Rana, Suresh [1 ,2 ]
Padannayil, Noufal Manthala [1 ]
Tran, Linh [3 ]
Rosenfeld, Anatoly B. [3 ]
Saeed, Hina [1 ,2 ]
Kasper, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Baptist Hlth South Florida, Boca Raton Reg Hosp, Lynn Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boca Raton, FL 33486 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys CMRP, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
关键词
IMPT; head and neck cancer; variable RBE; RBE-weighted dose; proton therapy; VARIABLE-RBE; BRAIN; MODEL; FRACTIONATION; RADIOTHERAPY; PROSTATE;
D O I
10.3390/curroncol31070272
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: In current clinical practice, intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) head and neck cancer (HNC) plans are generated using a constant relative biological effectiveness (cRBE) of 1.1. The primary goal of this study was to explore the dosimetric impact of proton range uncertainties on RBE-weighted dose (RWD) distributions using a variable RBE (vRBE) model in the context of bilateral HNC IMPT plans. Methods: The current study included the computed tomography (CT) datasets of ten bilateral HNC patients who had undergone photon therapy. Each patient's plan was generated using three IMPT beams to deliver doses to the CTV_High and CTV_Low for doses of 70 Gy(RBE) and 54 Gy(RBE), respectively, in 35 fractions through a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique. Each nominal plan calculated with a cRBE of 1.1 was subjected to the range uncertainties of +/- 3%. The McNamara vRBE model was used for RWD calculations. For each patient, the differences in dosimetric metrices between the RWD and nominal dose distributions were compared. Results: The constrictor muscles, oral cavity, parotids, larynx, thyroid, and esophagus showed average differences in mean dose (Dmean) values up to 6.91 Gy(RBE), indicating the impact of proton range uncertainties on RWD distributions. Similarly, the brachial plexus, brain, brainstem, spinal cord, and mandible showed varying degrees of the average differences in maximum dose (Dmax) values (2.78-10.75 Gy(RBE)). The Dmean and Dmax to the CTV from RWD distributions were within +/- 2% of the dosimetric results in nominal plans. Conclusion: The consistent trend of higher mean and maximum doses to the OARs with the McNamara vRBE model compared to cRBE model highlighted the need for consideration of proton range uncertainties while evaluating OAR doses in bilateral HNC IMPT plans.
引用
收藏
页码:3690 / 3697
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Increase in Tumor Control and Normal Tissue Complication Probabilities in Advanced Head-and-Neck Cancer for Dose-Escalated Intensity-Modulated Photon and Proton Therapy
    Jakobi, Annika
    Luehr, Armin
    Stuetzer, Kristin
    Bandurska-Luque, Anna
    Loeck, Steffen
    Krause, Mechthild
    Baumann, Michael
    Perrin, Rosalind
    Richter, Christian
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2015, 5
  • [32] The price of robustness; impact of worst-case optimization on organ-at-risk dose and complication probability in intensity-modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer patients
    van de Water, Steven
    van Dam, Iris
    Schaart, Dennis R.
    Al-Mamgani, Abrahim
    Heijmen, Ben J. M.
    Hoogeman, Mischa S.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 120 (01) : 56 - 62
  • [33] Reduced acute toxicity and improved efficacy from intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for the management of head and neck cancer
    McKeever, Matthew R.
    Sio, Terence T.
    Gunn, G. Brandon
    Holliday, Emma B.
    Blanchard, Pierre
    Kies, Merrill S.
    Weber, Randal S.
    Frank, Steven J.
    [J]. CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 5 (04)
  • [34] Incorporation of the LETd-weighted biological dose in the evaluation of breast intensity-modulated proton therapy plans
    Liu, Chunbo
    Zheng, Dandan
    Bradley, Julie A.
    Mailhot Vega, Raymond B.
    Zhang, Yawei
    Indelicato, Daniel J.
    Mendenhall, Nancy
    Liang, Xiaoying
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2021, 60 (02) : 252 - 259
  • [35] Clinical and dosimetric impact of adaptive intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced head-and-neck cancer
    Maheshwari, Guncha
    Dhanawat, Aditya
    Kumar, Harvindra S.
    Sharma, Neeti
    Jakhar, Shankar Lal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 16 (03) : 600 - 604
  • [36] CBCT-Based Adaptive Assessment Workflow for Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer
    De Ornelas, Mariluz
    Xu, Yihang
    Padgett, Kyle
    Schmidt, Ryder M.
    Butkus, Michael
    Diwanji, Tejan
    Luciani, Gus
    Lambiase, Jason
    Samuels, Stuart
    Samuels, Michael
    Dogan, Nesrin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2021, 7 (04) : 29 - 41
  • [37] Dosimetric Comparison and Selection Criteria of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Adaptive Re-Plan in T3-4 Nasopharynx Cancer Patients
    Ko, Mincheol
    Yang, Kyungmi
    Ahn, Yong Chan
    Ju, Sang Gyu
    Oh, Dongryul
    Kim, Yeong-bi
    Kwon, Dong Yeol
    Park, Seyjoon
    Lee, Kisung
    [J]. CANCERS, 2024, 16 (19)
  • [38] Dosimetric comparison of magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy, intensity-modulated proton therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for distal esophageal cancer
    Barsky, Andrew R.
    George, Jerry
    Wroe, Andrew J.
    Mittauer, Kathryn E.
    Kaiser, Adeel
    Herrera, Roberto
    Yu, Jen
    Gutierrez, Alonso N.
    Alvarez, Diane
    McCulloch, James
    Kasper, Michael E.
    Mehta, Minesh P.
    Chuong, Michael D.
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2024, 49 (02) : 121 - 126
  • [39] Skin dose for head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)
    Fu, Hsiao-Ju
    Li, Chi-Wei
    Tsai, Wei-Ta
    Chang, Chih-Chia
    Tsang, Yuk-Wah
    [J]. RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2017, 140 : 435 - 441
  • [40] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancer:: Prescribed dose, clinical challenges and results
    Martin, Etienne
    Deville, Coralie
    Bonnetain, Franck
    Bosset, Mathieu
    Crehange, Gilles
    Truc, Gilles
    Naudy, Suzanne
    Maingon, Philippe
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 85 (03) : 392 - 398