Quantifying the Dosimetric Impact of Proton Range Uncertainties on RBE-Weighted Dose Distributions in Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Bilateral Head and Neck Cancer

被引:1
作者
Rana, Suresh [1 ,2 ]
Padannayil, Noufal Manthala [1 ]
Tran, Linh [3 ]
Rosenfeld, Anatoly B. [3 ]
Saeed, Hina [1 ,2 ]
Kasper, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Baptist Hlth South Florida, Boca Raton Reg Hosp, Lynn Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boca Raton, FL 33486 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys CMRP, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
关键词
IMPT; head and neck cancer; variable RBE; RBE-weighted dose; proton therapy; VARIABLE-RBE; BRAIN; MODEL; FRACTIONATION; RADIOTHERAPY; PROSTATE;
D O I
10.3390/curroncol31070272
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: In current clinical practice, intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) head and neck cancer (HNC) plans are generated using a constant relative biological effectiveness (cRBE) of 1.1. The primary goal of this study was to explore the dosimetric impact of proton range uncertainties on RBE-weighted dose (RWD) distributions using a variable RBE (vRBE) model in the context of bilateral HNC IMPT plans. Methods: The current study included the computed tomography (CT) datasets of ten bilateral HNC patients who had undergone photon therapy. Each patient's plan was generated using three IMPT beams to deliver doses to the CTV_High and CTV_Low for doses of 70 Gy(RBE) and 54 Gy(RBE), respectively, in 35 fractions through a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique. Each nominal plan calculated with a cRBE of 1.1 was subjected to the range uncertainties of +/- 3%. The McNamara vRBE model was used for RWD calculations. For each patient, the differences in dosimetric metrices between the RWD and nominal dose distributions were compared. Results: The constrictor muscles, oral cavity, parotids, larynx, thyroid, and esophagus showed average differences in mean dose (Dmean) values up to 6.91 Gy(RBE), indicating the impact of proton range uncertainties on RWD distributions. Similarly, the brachial plexus, brain, brainstem, spinal cord, and mandible showed varying degrees of the average differences in maximum dose (Dmax) values (2.78-10.75 Gy(RBE)). The Dmean and Dmax to the CTV from RWD distributions were within +/- 2% of the dosimetric results in nominal plans. Conclusion: The consistent trend of higher mean and maximum doses to the OARs with the McNamara vRBE model compared to cRBE model highlighted the need for consideration of proton range uncertainties while evaluating OAR doses in bilateral HNC IMPT plans.
引用
收藏
页码:3690 / 3697
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Quantifying dose uncertainties resulting from cardiorespiratory motion in intensity-modulated proton therapy for cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy [J].
Wei, Weige ;
Li, Zhibin ;
Xiao, Qing ;
Wang, Guangyu ;
He, Haiping ;
Luo, Dashuang ;
Chen, Li ;
Li, Jing ;
Zhang, Xiangyu ;
Qin, Taolin ;
Song, Ying ;
Li, Guangjun ;
Bai, Sen .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
[22]   Anatomic changes in head and neck intensity-modulated proton therapy: Comparison between robust optimization and online adaptation [J].
Lalonde, Arthur ;
Bobic, Mislav ;
Winey, Brian ;
Verburg, Joost ;
Sharp, Gregory C. ;
Paganetti, Harald .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 159 :39-47
[23]   Robust optimization to reduce the impact of biological effect variation from physical uncertainties in intensity-modulated proton therapy [J].
Bai, Xuemin ;
Lim, Gino ;
Grosshans, David ;
Mohan, Radhe ;
Cao, Wenhua .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (02)
[24]   Investigating the utilization of beam-specific apertures for the intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) head and neck cancer plans [J].
Rana, Suresh ;
Storey, Mark ;
Padannayil, Noufal Manthala ;
Shamurailatpam, Dayananda Sharma ;
Bennouna, Jaafar ;
George, Jerry ;
Chang, John .
MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2021, 46 (02) :E7-E11
[25]   Patient-specific bolus for range shifter air gap reduction in intensity-modulated proton therapy of head-and-neck cancer studied with Monte Carlo based plan optimization [J].
Michiels, Steven ;
Barragan, Ana Maria ;
Souris, Kevin ;
Poels, Kenneth ;
Crijns, Wouter ;
Lee, John A. ;
Sterpin, Edmond ;
Nuyts, Sandra ;
Haustermans, Karin ;
Depuydt, Tom .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 128 (01) :161-166
[26]   Comparing the oncologic outcomes of proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [J].
Chang, Chia-Lun ;
Lin, Kuan-Chou ;
Chen, Wan-Ming ;
Shia, Ben-Chang ;
Wu, Szu-Yuan .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 190
[27]   Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans [J].
Rana, Suresh ;
Greco, Kevin ;
Samuel, E. James Jebaseelan ;
Bennouna, Jaafar .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (08) :36-46
[28]   Knowledge-Based Planning for Robustly Optimized Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy of Head and Neck Cancer Patients [J].
Xu, Yihang ;
Cyriac, Jonathan ;
De Ornelas, Mariluz ;
Bossart, Elizabeth ;
Padgett, Kyle ;
Butkus, Michael ;
Diwanji, Tejan ;
Samuels, Stuart ;
Samuels, Michael A. ;
Dogan, Nesrin .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
[29]   Dosimetric impact of dental metallic crown on intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer [J].
Kamomae, Takeshi ;
Itoh, Yoshiyuki ;
Okudaira, Kuniyasu ;
Nakaya, Takayoshi ;
Tomida, Masashi ;
Miyake, Yoshikazu ;
Oguchi, Hiroshi ;
Shiinoki, Takehiro ;
Kawamura, Mariko ;
Yamamoto, Noriyuki ;
Naganawa, Shinji .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (01) :234-245
[30]   A Critical Review of LET-Based Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Plan Evaluation and Optimization for Head and Neck Cancer Management [J].
Deng, Wei ;
Yang, Yunze ;
Liu, Chenbin ;
Bues, Martin ;
Mohan, Radhe ;
Wong, William W. ;
Foote, Robert H. ;
Patel, Samir H. ;
Liu, Wei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2021, 8 (01) :36-49