Quantifying the Dosimetric Impact of Proton Range Uncertainties on RBE-Weighted Dose Distributions in Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Bilateral Head and Neck Cancer

被引:0
作者
Rana, Suresh [1 ,2 ]
Padannayil, Noufal Manthala [1 ]
Tran, Linh [3 ]
Rosenfeld, Anatoly B. [3 ]
Saeed, Hina [1 ,2 ]
Kasper, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Baptist Hlth South Florida, Boca Raton Reg Hosp, Lynn Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boca Raton, FL 33486 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys CMRP, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
关键词
IMPT; head and neck cancer; variable RBE; RBE-weighted dose; proton therapy; VARIABLE-RBE; BRAIN; MODEL; FRACTIONATION; RADIOTHERAPY; PROSTATE;
D O I
10.3390/curroncol31070272
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: In current clinical practice, intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) head and neck cancer (HNC) plans are generated using a constant relative biological effectiveness (cRBE) of 1.1. The primary goal of this study was to explore the dosimetric impact of proton range uncertainties on RBE-weighted dose (RWD) distributions using a variable RBE (vRBE) model in the context of bilateral HNC IMPT plans. Methods: The current study included the computed tomography (CT) datasets of ten bilateral HNC patients who had undergone photon therapy. Each patient's plan was generated using three IMPT beams to deliver doses to the CTV_High and CTV_Low for doses of 70 Gy(RBE) and 54 Gy(RBE), respectively, in 35 fractions through a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique. Each nominal plan calculated with a cRBE of 1.1 was subjected to the range uncertainties of +/- 3%. The McNamara vRBE model was used for RWD calculations. For each patient, the differences in dosimetric metrices between the RWD and nominal dose distributions were compared. Results: The constrictor muscles, oral cavity, parotids, larynx, thyroid, and esophagus showed average differences in mean dose (Dmean) values up to 6.91 Gy(RBE), indicating the impact of proton range uncertainties on RWD distributions. Similarly, the brachial plexus, brain, brainstem, spinal cord, and mandible showed varying degrees of the average differences in maximum dose (Dmax) values (2.78-10.75 Gy(RBE)). The Dmean and Dmax to the CTV from RWD distributions were within +/- 2% of the dosimetric results in nominal plans. Conclusion: The consistent trend of higher mean and maximum doses to the OARs with the McNamara vRBE model compared to cRBE model highlighted the need for consideration of proton range uncertainties while evaluating OAR doses in bilateral HNC IMPT plans.
引用
收藏
页码:3690 / 3697
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robust optimization to reduce the impact of biological effect variation from physical uncertainties in intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Bai, Xuemin
    Lim, Gino
    Grosshans, David
    Mohan, Radhe
    Cao, Wenhua
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (02)
  • [22] Anatomic changes in head and neck intensity-modulated proton therapy: Comparison between robust optimization and online adaptation
    Lalonde, Arthur
    Bobic, Mislav
    Winey, Brian
    Verburg, Joost
    Sharp, Gregory C.
    Paganetti, Harald
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 159 : 39 - 47
  • [23] Investigating the utilization of beam-specific apertures for the intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) head and neck cancer plans
    Rana, Suresh
    Storey, Mark
    Padannayil, Noufal Manthala
    Shamurailatpam, Dayananda Sharma
    Bennouna, Jaafar
    George, Jerry
    Chang, John
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2021, 46 (02) : E7 - E11
  • [24] Patient-specific bolus for range shifter air gap reduction in intensity-modulated proton therapy of head-and-neck cancer studied with Monte Carlo based plan optimization
    Michiels, Steven
    Barragan, Ana Maria
    Souris, Kevin
    Poels, Kenneth
    Crijns, Wouter
    Lee, John A.
    Sterpin, Edmond
    Nuyts, Sandra
    Haustermans, Karin
    Depuydt, Tom
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 128 (01) : 161 - 166
  • [25] Comparing the oncologic outcomes of proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
    Chang, Chia-Lun
    Lin, Kuan-Chou
    Chen, Wan-Ming
    Shia, Ben-Chang
    Wu, Szu-Yuan
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 190
  • [26] Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans
    Rana, Suresh
    Greco, Kevin
    Samuel, E. James Jebaseelan
    Bennouna, Jaafar
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (08): : 36 - 46
  • [27] Knowledge-Based Planning for Robustly Optimized Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy of Head and Neck Cancer Patients
    Xu, Yihang
    Cyriac, Jonathan
    De Ornelas, Mariluz
    Bossart, Elizabeth
    Padgett, Kyle
    Butkus, Michael
    Diwanji, Tejan
    Samuels, Stuart
    Samuels, Michael A.
    Dogan, Nesrin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [28] Dosimetric impact of dental metallic crown on intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer
    Kamomae, Takeshi
    Itoh, Yoshiyuki
    Okudaira, Kuniyasu
    Nakaya, Takayoshi
    Tomida, Masashi
    Miyake, Yoshikazu
    Oguchi, Hiroshi
    Shiinoki, Takehiro
    Kawamura, Mariko
    Yamamoto, Noriyuki
    Naganawa, Shinji
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (01): : 234 - 245
  • [29] A Critical Review of LET-Based Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Plan Evaluation and Optimization for Head and Neck Cancer Management
    Deng, Wei
    Yang, Yunze
    Liu, Chenbin
    Bues, Martin
    Mohan, Radhe
    Wong, William W.
    Foote, Robert H.
    Patel, Samir H.
    Liu, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2021, 8 (01) : 36 - 49
  • [30] Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, adaptive radiotherapy proton radiotherapy, and adaptive proton radiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer
    Simone, Charles B., II
    Ly, David
    Dan, Tu D.
    Ondos, John
    Ning, Holly
    Belard, Arnaud
    O'Connell, John
    Miller, Robert W.
    Simone, Nicole L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 101 (03) : 376 - 382