A SECOND ORDER RELATIVE MOTION MODEL FOR GATEWAY

被引:0
|
作者
Cunningham, David A. [1 ]
Russell, Ryan P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Aerosp Engn & Engn Mech, Austin, TX 78712 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 44TH ANNUAL AMERICAN ASTRONAUTICAL SOCIETY GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, AND CONTROL CONFERENCE, AAS 2022 | 2024年
关键词
STATE TRANSITION MATRIX; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-51928-4_34
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Current Gateway rendezvous, proximity operations, and docking plans are limited to segments of the Gateway orbit far from the moon due to highly nonlinear dynamics as Gateway approaches perilune, which stress existing relative motion models. This work introduces a preliminary version of the Quadratic Interpolated State Transition (QIST) relative motion model as a closed-form second order model that provides accurate relative trajectory prediction for the entire Gateway orbit including the difficult region surrounding perilune. The QIST model utilizes interpolated state transition tensors of a Gateway reference orbit, used to propagate arbitrary relative motion trajectories without numerical integration of the relative trajectory. Further, the underlying periodicity of the Gateway orbit used in the new model makes it valid for relative trajectories of arbitrary duration while only storing interpolant information for a single Gateway period. The memory footprint of the precomputed interpolants is considered relative to the interpolant accuracy, with the highest fidelity model requiring 250 kB, and reduced accuracy models needing 150 kB of memory to store the interpolant coefficients. The new model's interpolation and state transition tensor generation scheme is validated by comparing a propagation using interpolated tensors to one using integrated tensors. Both the first- and second-order interpolated state updates are shown to agree with the updates obtained by integration to double precision.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 583
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Centrifugal bias for second-order but not first-order motion
    Dumoulin, SO
    Baker, CL
    Hess, RF
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2001, 18 (09) : 2179 - 2189
  • [42] Second-order motion conveys depth-order information
    Hegdé, J
    Albright, TD
    Stoner, GR
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2004, 4 (10): : 838 - 842
  • [43] A centrifugal bias for second-order but not first-order motion
    Dumoulin, SO
    Baker, CL
    Hess, RF
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S795 - S795
  • [44] Changes in relative dominance of first- and second-order motion signals can be explained by differences in spatial tuning
    Glasser, D.
    Tadin, D.
    PERCEPTION, 2011, 40 : 132 - 132
  • [45] First-order, second-order, and third-order motion systems
    Sperling, G.
    PERCEPTION, 1998, 27 : 3 - 3
  • [46] Improving UWB ranging accuracy via multiple network model with second order motion prediction
    Guangwei Xing
    Yanrong Guo
    Xiaoxuan Chen
    Hangzai Luo
    Sheng Zhong
    Cluster Computing, 2024, 27 : 2261 - 2272
  • [47] Improving UWB ranging accuracy via multiple network model with second order motion prediction
    Xing, Guangwei
    Guo, Yanrong
    Chen, Xiaoxuan
    Luo, Hangzai
    Zhong, Sheng
    CLUSTER COMPUTING-THE JOURNAL OF NETWORKS SOFTWARE TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 27 (02): : 2261 - 2272
  • [48] Attentional modulation of threshold sensitivity to first-order motion and second-order motion patterns
    Allen, HA
    Ledgeway, T
    VISION RESEARCH, 2003, 43 (27) : 2927 - 2936
  • [49] First-order and second-order motion shifts perceived position with and without awareness of the motion
    Whitney, D
    Bressler, D
    PERCEPTION, 2005, 34 : 143 - 143
  • [50] Second-order motion processed by the first-order motion system at high carrier contrasts
    Allard, R.
    Faubert, J.
    PERCEPTION, 2013, 42 : 208 - 208