Deep Learning Radiomics Nomogram Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Differentiating Type I/II Ovarian Cancer

被引:6
作者
Wei, Mingxiang [1 ]
Feng, Guannan [2 ]
Wang, Xinyi [1 ]
Jia, Jianye [3 ]
Zhang, Yu [4 ]
Dai, Yao [5 ]
Qin, Cai [6 ]
Bai, Genji [3 ]
Chen, Shuangqing [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Suzhou Municipal Hosp, Gusu Sch, Dept Radiol,Affiliated Suzhou Hosp, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Suzhou Municipal Hosp, Gusu Sch, Dept Gynecol,Affiliated Suzhou Hosp, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Huaian Peoples Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, Huaian, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Soochow Univ, Dushu Lake Hosp, Dept Radiol, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[5] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[6] Nantong Univ, Tumor Hosp, Dept Radiol, Nantong, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Epithelial ovarian cancer; Deep learning; Radiomics; Nomogram; Magnetic resonance imaging; EPIDIDYMIS PROTEIN 4; HE-4;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2023.08.002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: To develop and validate a T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based deep learning radiomics nomogram (DLRN) to differentiate between type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).<br /> Materials and Methods: This multicenter study incorporated 437 patients from five centers, divided into training ( n = 271), internal validation ( n = 68), and external validation ( n = 98) sets. The deep learning (DL) model was constructed using the largest orthogonal slices of the tumor area. The extracted radiomics features were employed in building the radiomics model. The clinical model was developed based on clinical characteristics. A DLRN was built by integrating the DL signature, radiomics signature, and independent clinical predictors. Model performances were evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, Brier score, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were compared using the DeLong test. A two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered significantly different.<br /> Results: The DLRN exhibited satisfactory discrimination between type I and type II EOC with the AUC of 0.888 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.810, 0.966) and 0.866 (95% CI 0.786, 0.946) in the internal and external validation sets, respectively. These AUCs significantly exceeded those of the clinical model ( P = 0.013 and 0.043, in the internal and external validation sets, respectively). The DLRN demonstrated optimal classification accuracy and clinical application value, according to Brier scores, calibration curves, and DCA.<br /> Conclusion: A T2-weighted MRI-based DLRN showed promising potential in differentiating between type I and type II EOC, which could offer assistance in clinical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:2391 / 2401
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: 2021 update
    Berek, Jonathan S.
    Renz, Malte
    Kehoe, Sean
    Kumar, Lalit
    Friedlander, Michael
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2021, 155 : 61 - 85
  • [2] Development and validation of a deep learning radiomics nomogram for preoperatively differentiating thymic epithelial tumor histologic subtypes
    Chen, Xiangmeng
    Feng, Bao
    Xu, Kuncai
    Chen, Yehang
    Duan, Xiaobei
    Jin, Zhifa
    Li, Kunwei
    Li, Ronggang
    Long, Wansheng
    Liu, Xueguo
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (10) : 6804 - 6816
  • [3] A CT-based deep learning radiomics nomogram for predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: A multicenter cohort study
    Cui, Yanfen
    Zhang, Jiayi
    Li, Zhenhui
    Wei, Kaikai
    Lei, Ye
    Ren, Jialiang
    Wu, Lei
    Shi, Zhenwei
    Meng, Xiaochun
    Yang, Xiaotang
    Gao, Xin
    [J]. ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2022, 46
  • [4] Deep learning radiomic nomogram can predict the number of lymph node metastasis in locally advanced gastric cancer: an international multicenter study
    Dong, D.
    Fang, M. -J.
    Tang, L.
    Shan, X. -H.
    Gao, J. -B.
    Giganti, F.
    Wang, R. -P.
    Chen, X.
    Wang, X. -X.
    Palumbo, D.
    Fu, J.
    Li, W. -C.
    Li, J.
    Zhong, L. -Z.
    De Cobelli, F.
    Ji, J. -F.
    Liu, Z. -Y.
    Tian, J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 (07) : 912 - 920
  • [5] ESUR recommendations for MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass: an update
    Forstner, Rosemarie
    Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle
    Cunha, Teresa Margarida
    Kinkel, Karen
    Masselli, Gabriele
    Kubik-Huch, Rahel
    Spencer, John A.
    Rockall, Andrea
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (06) : 2248 - 2257
  • [6] Reproductive and hormone-related risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer by histologic pathways, invasiveness and histologic subtypes: Results from the EPIC cohort
    Fortner, Renee T.
    Ose, Jennifer
    Merritt, Melissa A.
    Schock, Helena
    Tjonneland, Anne
    Hansen, Louise
    Overvad, Kim
    Dossus, Laure
    Clavel-Chapelon, Francoise
    Baglietto, Laura
    Boeing, Heiner
    Trichopoulou, Antonia
    Benetou, Vassiliki
    Lagiou, Pagona
    Agnoli, Claudia
    Mattiello, Amalia
    Masala, Giovanna
    Tumino, Rosario
    Sacerdote, Carlotta
    Bueno-de-Mesquita, H. B
    Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte
    Peeters, Petra H.
    Weiderpass, Elisabete
    Gram, Inger Torhild
    Duell, Eric J.
    Larranaga, Nerea
    Ardanaz, Eva
    Sanchez, Maria-Jose
    Chirlaque, M-D
    Braendstedt, Jenny
    Idahl, Annika
    Lundin, Eva
    Khaw, Kay-Tee
    Wareham, Nick
    Travis, Ruth C.
    Rinaldi, Sabina
    Romieu, Isabelle
    Gunter, Marc J.
    Riboli, Elio
    Kaaks, Rudolf
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 137 (05) : 1196 - 1208
  • [7] Evaluation of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) as diagnostic tools of type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer in Japanese women
    Fujiwara, Hiroyuki
    Suzuki, Mitsuaki
    Takeshima, Nobuhiro
    Takizawa, Ken
    Kimura, Eizo
    Nakanishi, Toru
    Yamada, Kyosuke
    Takano, Hirokuni
    Sasaki, Hiroshi
    Koyama, Koji
    Ochiai, Kazunori
    [J]. TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2015, 36 (02) : 1045 - 1053
  • [8] Gasiorowska E, 2015, GINEKOL POL, V86, P88
  • [9] Artificial intelligence in radiology
    Hosny, Ahmed
    Parmar, Chintan
    Quackenbush, John
    Schwartz, Lawrence H.
    Aerts, Hugo J. W. L.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2018, 18 (08) : 500 - 510
  • [10] MR image-based radiomics to differentiate type Ι and type ΙΙ epithelial ovarian cancers
    Jian, Junming
    Li, Yongai
    Pickhardt, Perry J.
    Xia, Wei
    He, Zhang
    Zhang, Rui
    Zhao, Shuhui
    Zhao, Xingyu
    Cai, Songqi
    Zhang, Jiayi
    Zhang, Guofu
    Jiang, Jingxuan
    Zhang, Yan
    Wang, Keying
    Lin, Guangwu
    Feng, Feng
    Wu, Xiaodong
    Gao, Xin
    Qiang, Jinwei
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (01) : 403 - 410