The reliability and validity of brief cognitive screening tools used in traumatic brain injury: A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Mclaren, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
Fradera, Alexander [1 ,3 ]
Cullen, Breda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Sch Hlth & Wellbeing, Clarice Pears Bldg,90 Byres Rd, Glasgow City G128TB, Scotland
[2] NHS Ayrshire & Arran, Ayr, Scotland
[3] NHS Lanarkshire, Motherwell, Scotland
关键词
Traumatic brain injury; Screening tool; Cognitive assessment; Neuropsychological test; Reliability; Validity; Psychometric assessment; STATUS EXAMINATION COGNISTAT; ACUTE CONCUSSION EVALUATION; MINI-MENTAL-STATE; BNI SCREEN; IMPAIRMENT; DEMENTIA; UTILITY; STROKE; TESTS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1080/09602011.2024.2357850
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Reliable and valid cognitive screening tools are essential in the assessment of those with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Yet, there is no consensus about which tool should be used in clinical practice. This systematic review assessed psychometric properties of cognitive screening tools for detecting cognitive impairment in TBI. Inclusion criteria were: peer-reviewed validation studies of a cognitive screening tool(s); with a sample of adults aged 18-80 diagnosed with TBI (mild-severe); and with psychometrics consistent with COSMIN guidelines. Published literature was retrieved from MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO on 27 January 2022. A narrative synthesis was performed. Thirty-four studies evaluated the psychometric properties of a total of 22 cognitive screening tools, in a variety of languages. Properties assessed included structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, criterion validity (or diagnostic test accuracy), convergent/divergent validity, and discriminant validity. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) were the most widely validated cognitive screening tools for use in TBI. The MoCA had the most promising evidence of its psychometric properties, which has implications for clinical practice. Future research should aim to follow standard criteria for psychometric studies to allow meaningful comparisons across the literature.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reliability and Validity of the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System: A Systematic Review
    Abedi, Aidin
    Mokkink, Lidwine B.
    Zadegan, Shayan Abdollah
    Paholpak, Permsak
    Tamai, Koji
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    Buser, Zorica
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 9 (02) : 231 - 242
  • [42] Screening Tools for Child Abuse Used by Healthcare Providers: A Systematic Review
    Chen, Chia-Jung
    Chen, Yi-Wen
    Chang, Hsin-Yi
    Feng, Jui-Ying
    JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2022, 30 (01) : E193
  • [43] Quantitative Electroencephalography Objectivity and Reliability in the Diagnosis and Management of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review
    Amico, Francesco
    Koberda, Jaroslaw Lucas
    CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2023,
  • [44] Evaluation of Available Cognitive Tools Used to Measure Mild Cognitive Decline: A Scoping Review
    Chun, Chian Thong
    Seward, Kirsty
    Patterson, Amanda
    Melton, Alice
    MacDonald-Wicks, Lesley
    NUTRIENTS, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [45] Cognitive Training for Post-Acute Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hallock, Harry
    Collins, Daniel
    Lampit, Amit
    Deol, Kiran
    Fleming, Jennifer
    Valenzuela, Michael
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [46] Efficacy of Telerehabilitation for Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review
    Ownsworth, Tamara
    Arnautovska, Urska
    Beadle, Elizabeth
    Shum, David H. K.
    Moyle, Wendy
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2018, 33 (04) : E33 - E46
  • [47] Olfactory Dysfunction in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review
    Bakker, Kathleen
    Catroppa, Cathy
    Anderson, Vicki
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2014, 31 (04) : 308 - 314
  • [48] Cognitive screening for dementia in primary care: a systematic review
    Yokomizo, Juliana Emy
    Simon, Sharon Sanz
    de Campos Bottino, Cassio Machado
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2014, 26 (11) : 1783 - 1804
  • [49] Diagnostic accuracy of cognitive screening tools validated for older adults in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kamalzadeh, Leila
    Tayyebi, Gooya
    Shariati, Behnam
    Shati, Mohsen
    Saeedi, Vahid
    Malakouti, Seyed Kazem
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [50] Reliability and Validity of the Berg Balance Scale in the Stroke Population: A Systematic Review
    Kudlac, Megan
    Sabol, Joseph
    Kaiser, Katelynn
    Kane, Cecelia
    Phillips, Robert S.
    PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS, 2019, 37 (03) : 196 - 221