The reliability and validity of brief cognitive screening tools used in traumatic brain injury: A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Mclaren, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
Fradera, Alexander [1 ,3 ]
Cullen, Breda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Sch Hlth & Wellbeing, Clarice Pears Bldg,90 Byres Rd, Glasgow City G128TB, Scotland
[2] NHS Ayrshire & Arran, Ayr, Scotland
[3] NHS Lanarkshire, Motherwell, Scotland
关键词
Traumatic brain injury; Screening tool; Cognitive assessment; Neuropsychological test; Reliability; Validity; Psychometric assessment; STATUS EXAMINATION COGNISTAT; ACUTE CONCUSSION EVALUATION; MINI-MENTAL-STATE; BNI SCREEN; IMPAIRMENT; DEMENTIA; UTILITY; STROKE; TESTS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1080/09602011.2024.2357850
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Reliable and valid cognitive screening tools are essential in the assessment of those with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Yet, there is no consensus about which tool should be used in clinical practice. This systematic review assessed psychometric properties of cognitive screening tools for detecting cognitive impairment in TBI. Inclusion criteria were: peer-reviewed validation studies of a cognitive screening tool(s); with a sample of adults aged 18-80 diagnosed with TBI (mild-severe); and with psychometrics consistent with COSMIN guidelines. Published literature was retrieved from MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO on 27 January 2022. A narrative synthesis was performed. Thirty-four studies evaluated the psychometric properties of a total of 22 cognitive screening tools, in a variety of languages. Properties assessed included structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, criterion validity (or diagnostic test accuracy), convergent/divergent validity, and discriminant validity. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) were the most widely validated cognitive screening tools for use in TBI. The MoCA had the most promising evidence of its psychometric properties, which has implications for clinical practice. Future research should aim to follow standard criteria for psychometric studies to allow meaningful comparisons across the literature.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity and reliability of swallowing screening tools used by nurses for dysphagia: A systematic review
    Jiang, Jiin-Ling
    Fu, Shu-Ying
    Wang, Wan-Hsiang
    Ma, Yu-Chin
    TZU CHI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 28 (02): : 41 - 48
  • [2] A brief review of practical preoperative cognitive screening tools
    Long, L. Stephen
    Shapiro, William A.
    Leung, Jacqueline M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2012, 59 (08): : 798 - 804
  • [3] The validity of the Brain Injury Cognitive Screen (BICS) as a neuropsychological screening assessment for traumatic and non-traumatic brain injury
    Vaughan, Frances L.
    Neal, Jo Anne
    Mulla, Farzana Nizam
    Edwards, Barbara
    Coetzer, Rudi
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2017, 31 (03) : 544 - 568
  • [4] What is the extent of reliability and validity evidence for screening tools for cognitive and behavioral change in people with ALS? A systematic review
    Didcote, Lyndsay
    Vitoratou, Silia
    Al-Chalabi, Ammar
    Goldstein, Laura H.
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS AND FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION, 2024, 25 (5-6) : 437 - 451
  • [5] Validity of screening tools for dementia and mild cognitive impairment among the elderly in primary health care: a systematic review
    Abd Razak, M. A.
    Ahmad, N. A.
    Chan, Y. Y.
    Kasim, N. Mohamad
    Yusof, M.
    Ghani, M. K. A. Abdul
    Omar, M.
    Abd Aziz, F. A.
    Jamaluddin, R.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 169 : 84 - 92
  • [6] Reliability and validity of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale for patients with traumatic brain injury
    Cheng, Yun
    Zhang, Yu
    Zhang, Yi
    Wu, Ye-Huan
    Zhang, Shuang
    APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT, 2022, 29 (05) : 1160 - 1166
  • [7] Preliminary study of the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination (SLUMS) in detecting cognitive impairment in patients with traumatic brain injury
    Zhang, Shuang
    Wu, Ye-Huan
    Zhang, Yi
    Zhang, Yu
    Cheng, Yun
    APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT, 2021, 28 (06) : 633 - 640
  • [8] A systematic review of assessment tools for adults used in traumatic brain injury research and their relationship to the ICF
    Tate, Robyn L.
    Godbee, Kali
    Sigmundsdottir, Linda
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2013, 32 (04) : 729 - 750
  • [9] Validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for traumatic brain injury patients with intracranial haemorrhage
    Wong, George Kwok Chu
    Ngai, Karine
    Lam, Sandy Wai
    Wong, Adrian
    Mok, Vincent
    Poon, Wai Sang
    BRAIN INJURY, 2013, 27 (04) : 394 - 398
  • [10] Cognitive reserve in the recovery and rehabilitation of stroke and traumatic brain injury: A systematic review
    Oliva, Giulia
    Masina, Fabio
    Hosseinkhani, Nazanin
    Montemurro, Sonia
    Arcara, Giorgio
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2024,