Contested nuclear discourses during the 2022 French presidential campaign

被引:0
作者
Sconfienza, Umberto Mario [1 ,2 ]
Durand, Frederic [1 ]
机构
[1] Luxembourg Inst Socioecon Res LISER, Dept Urban Dev & Mobil, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
[2] 11 Porte Sci, L-4366 Belval, Esch Sur Alzett, Luxembourg
关键词
Nuclear energy; France; discourse analysis; discourse network analysis; sobri & eacute; t & eacute; presidential campaign; PUBLIC-OPINION; POLICY; POWER;
D O I
10.1080/1523908X.2024.2358505
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The debate on nuclear energy in France offers insights into how energy, the environment, the economy, and society intersect. These insights are crucial to understand the future of sustainable energy. In this paper, the French nuclear debate as it emerged on Twitter during the Presidential campaign of 2021-2022 is analysed through a two-step discursive approach. Discourse Network Analysis is used to create a snapshot of the debate in terms of coalitions of actors and discourses; then, an interpretive approach is employed to analyse the meanings attached to the sets of policy positions obtained through DNA. The article shows who are the main actors and the most common arguments. Furthermore, it shows that, in France, pursuing the use of civil nuclear is framed as a pragmatic choice in the face of climate change and insecure energy supplies; in populist terms as a form of energy that could turn back the clock of globalisation; and as an impasse that prevents France from embracing a truly sustainable energy agenda. By unveiling this set of discourses, the article challenges the idea of 'French nuclear exceptionalism' often found in the literature and the media and contributes to the larger literature on nuclear discourses..
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 433
页数:17
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Annotation of Smart Cities Twitter Micro-Contents for Enhanced Citizen's Engagement
    Alkhammash, Eman H.
    Jussila, Jari
    Lytras, Miltiadis D.
    Visvizi, Anna
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 116267 - 116276
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, Electronic News, DOI [10.1177/1931243110389457, DOI 10.1177/1931243110389457]
  • [3] Balmaceda MM, 2021, Woodrow Wilson Cent, P1, DOI 10.7312/balm19748
  • [4] Bern M. R., 2013, METHODOLOGIE PRAXIS, P283
  • [5] Effects of message framing in policy communication on climate change
    Bertolotti, Mauro
    Catellani, Patrizia
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 44 (05) : 474 - 486
  • [6] Brcher W., 1994, REV GOGRAPHIQUE LEST, V34, P45, DOI [https://doi.org/10.3406/rgest.1994.2270, DOI 10.3406/RGEST.1994.2270]
  • [7] Policy beyond politics? Public opinion, party politics and the French pro-nuclear energy policy
    Brouard, Sylvain
    Guinaudeau, Isabelle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY, 2015, 35 (01) : 137 - 170
  • [8] Chafer T., 1985, West European Politics, V8, P5, DOI DOI 10.1080/01402388508424510
  • [9] Chambru M., 2016, ENJEUX LINFORMATION, V16/3A, P29, DOI [https://doi.org/10.3917/enic.hs1.0029, DOI 10.3917/ENIC.HS1.0029]
  • [10] Czard F., 2019, PANORAMA NOTION SOBR, P51