Influence analysis of environmental factors on the subjective well-being of office workers in Japan: A structural equation modeling approach

被引:1
作者
Fukawa, Yuta [1 ,3 ]
Ohba, Mayumi [1 ,4 ]
Akamatsu, Nami [1 ]
Onoda, Ryosuke [1 ,5 ]
Ikeuchi, Kosuke [1 ,5 ]
Minami, Kazuhiro [2 ]
Takahashi, Noriko [2 ]
Watanabe, Futa [2 ]
Iida, Takayoshi [2 ]
Kaneko, Yosuke [2 ]
Tanabe, Shin-ichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Waseda Univ, Dept Architecture, 3-4-1 Okubo,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1698555, Japan
[2] Mitsubishi Electr Corp, Informat Technol R&D Ctr, 5-1-1 Ofuna, Kamakura, Kanagawa 2478501, Japan
[3] Nippon Inst Technol, Dept Architecture, 4-1 Gakuendai, Minami Saitama, Saitama 3450826, Japan
[4] Arup, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Kajima Corp, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Office environment; Well-being; Health and comfort; Personality traits; Office types; Structural equation modeling; SATISFACTION; LIFE; PRODUCTIVITY; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111827
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The built environment is believed to have a considerable influence on the well-being of individuals. However, very few studies have been conducted to clarify the influence structure on the well-being of occupants in office spaces. There is a need to assess the influence of environmental factors at work and quality of life on well-being. We conducted an online survey in three metropolitan areas of Japan to investigate the influence structure on the subjective well-being (SWB). The survey items included questions on SWB, employment, office environment, private life, and community, personal attributes, and spatial attributes of the offices where they work. It was hypothesized that the influence structure can be explained using a higher-order factor analysis model, wherein "quality of work," " quality of private life," and " quality of community" serve as the top factors. Consequently, a structural equation model with a high level of goodness of fit was developed (CFI = 0.908 and RMSEA = 0.044). Improving "quality of work" had a significant impact as a key factor in promoting SWB in this model. The importance of "job satisfaction," "fulfillment of office environment," and "work engagement" in the assessment of work quality was further clarified. The multi-group analysis demonstrated the impact of variations in personal and spatial attributes on the influence structure. For example, office environments with basic quality and adjustability were found to be more critical for enhancing SWB of environmentally sensitive workers. Future surveys with diverse sample groups are required to validate the model in this study.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Ten questions concerning well-being in the built environment
    Altomonte, Sergio
    Allen, Joseph
    Bluyssen, Philomena M.
    Brager, Gail
    Heschong, Lisa
    Loder, Angela
    Schiavon, Stefano
    Veitch, Jennifer A.
    Wang, Lily
    Wargocki, Pawel
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 180 (180)
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2021, Information and Communications in Japan WHITE PAPER 2021
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, WELL Building Standard v2Pilot Light Design
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1997, JAKARTA DECLARATION
  • [5] Arbuckle J.L., 2019, Amos Computer Program
  • [6] A systematic review of literature on Human capital investment and its significance for human resource development
    Arokiasamy, Lawrence
    Fujikawa, Takemi
    Piaralal, Shishi Kumar
    Arumugam, Thilageswary
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 14 (05) : 1810 - 1826
  • [7] The physical office workplace as a resource for mental health-A systematic scoping review
    Bergefurt, Lisanne
    Weijs-Perr, Minou
    Appel-Meulenbroek, Rianne
    Arentze, Theo
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 207
  • [8] Assessment of wellbeing in an indoor office environment
    Bluyssen, Philomena M.
    Janssen, Sabine
    van den Brink, Linde H.
    de Kluizenaar, Yvonne
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 46 (12) : 2632 - 2640
  • [9] Bollen K. A, 1989, Structural equations with latent variables
  • [10] Cabinet Office, 2020, Fourth Report on "Survey on Satisfaction and Quality of Life