Psychometric Analysis of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)

被引:0
作者
Miley, Emilie N. [1 ,2 ]
Casanova, Madeline P. [3 ,4 ]
Pickering, Michael A. [5 ]
Cheatham, Scott W. [5 ]
Larkins, Lindsay W. [5 ]
Cady, Adam C. [6 ]
Baker, Russell T. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Inst Sports Sci & Med, Dept Hlth Nutr & Food Sci, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Tallahassee Orthoped Clin, Tallahassee, FL 32308 USA
[3] Univ Idaho, WWAMI Med Educ Program, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[4] Univ Idaho, Idaho Off Underserved & Rural Med Res, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[5] Univ Idaho, Dept Movement Sci, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[6] Kaiser Permanente, Woodland Hills, CA 91367 USA
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; confirmatory factor analysis; multi-group invariance testing; latent growth-curve modeling; COEFFICIENT ALPHA; SHORT-FORM; VALIDATION; RELIABILITY; VERSION; WOMAC;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare12171789
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey (HOOS) was developed as a region- and disease-specific outcome to assess hip disability. Despite the use of the HOOS in clinical practice and research, psychometric analyses of the scale in a large dataset of patients have not been performed. As such, the purposes of this study were to assess the structural validity of the HOOS in patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty. Data were obtained from the Surgical Outcome System (SOS) global registry. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess the scale structure of the 40-item HOOS and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify a parsimonious scale structure. The parsimonious model identified was subjected to multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing and LGC modeling. The original five-factor, 40-item HOOS did not meet recommended model fit indices values (CFI = 0.822, TLI = 0.809, IFI = 0.822, RMSEA = 0.085). Alternate model generation identified an alternative model (i.e., HOOS-9). Sound model fit was identified for the HOOS-9 (CFI = 0.974, TLI = 0.961, RMSEA = 0.046). Invariance testing criteria were also met between groups (i.e., age and sex) and across time. Lastly, a nonlinear growth trajectory was identified in responses pertaining to hip disability. The original scale structure of the 40-item HOOS was not supported. The HOOS-9 met contemporary model fit recommendations, along with multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing. Our findings support the preliminary use of the HOOS-9 to assess hip function and disability in research and clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] A National Public Health Agenda for Osteoarthritis, 2020, About us
  • [2] Adema J., 2009, Med. Teach, V31, pe226, DOI [10.1080/01421590802516756, DOI 10.1080/01421590802516756]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2023, Final Rule-CMS-1771-F
  • [4] [Anonymous], Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1995, Reading and understanding multivariate statistics
  • [6] Assessment of reliability, validity, responsiveness and minimally important change of the German Hip dysfunction and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip
    Arbab, Dariusch
    van Ochten, Johannes H. M.
    Schnurr, Christoph
    Bouillon, Bertil
    Koenig, Dietmar
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 37 (12) : 2005 - 2011
  • [7] BELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833
  • [8] Validation of a proposed WOMAC short form for patients with hip osteoarthritis
    Bilbao, Amaia
    Quintana, Jose M.
    Escobar, Antonio
    Las Hayas, Carlota
    Orive, Miren
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2011, 9
  • [9] Brown T.A., 2006, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR, P475, DOI DOI 10.5860/CHOICE.44-2769
  • [10] Bryant F. B., 1995, Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics, P99