Comparative Evaluation of the Removal of Gutta Percha From the Root Canal Using Various Retreatment File Systems With and Without Magnification: An In Vitro Study

被引:1
作者
Arun, Nishitha [1 ]
Solete, Pradeep [1 ]
Jeevanandan, Ganesh [2 ]
Antony, Delphine P. [1 ]
Sairaman, Sruthi [1 ]
机构
[1] Saveetha Univ, Saveetha Dent Coll & Hosp, Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Chennai, India
[2] Saveetha Univ, Saveetha Dent Coll & Hosp, Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Dept Pediat & Prevent Dent, Chennai, India
关键词
solite rs3; retreatment; remnants; protaper; neo endo; gutta percha; ENDODONTIC RETREATMENT; EFFICACY; ROTARY; INSTRUMENTS; POROSITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.62128
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim and objective: The main goal was to compare the efficacy of gutta percha (GP) removal from the root canal using the Neo Endo Retreatment file system, Solite RS3, and ProTaper Universal Retreatment (PTUR) files with and without magnification under a direct operative microscope using stereomicroscopic evaluation. Materials and methods: Sixty single-rooted teeth were randomly assigned to one of three groups after obturation till F2 mastercone with resin sealer: Group 1 (n=20): Neo Endo Retreatment Files, Group 2 (n=20): Solite RS3, Group 3 (n=20): PTUR files. Each group was further separated into two subgroups: Subgroup 1: without magnification (no direct operative microscope) and Subgroup 2: with magnification under a direct operative microscope at 12x magnification. After retreatment, the roots were grooved buccolingually and split into two halves using a diamond disc with the help of a chisel. The samples were examined under a stereomicroscope. Images were captured in a digital camera and analyzed using image analyzing software Image Pro v10 (Media Cybernetics). Results: The Neo Endo retreatment file system had a significantly greater percentage of remaining obturating material than the Solite RS3 Retreatment and PTUR file systems (p<0.05) in both groups with and without magnification. In the group without magnification, Solite RS3 showed a significant difference compared to ProTaper (p<0.05). In the group with magnification, there was no significant difference between the ProTaper Universal retreatment file system and Solite RS3 (p=0.589). Retreatment performed without magnification had more remnant GP when compared to the retreatment procedure performed under magnification of the direct operative microscope. Conclusion: Under stereomicroscopic evaluation, the remnant GP was higher in the Neo Endo File System both with and without magnification than in the Solite Retreatment and PTUR file systems. ProTaper showed moderate significance in removing the obturation than Solite RS3 in the magnification group. The Solite RS3 file system performed as efficiently as the PTUR file system.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of the effectiveness of various rotary and reciprocating systems with different surface treatments to remove gutta-percha and an epoxy resin-based sealer from straight root canals
    Bago, I.
    Suk, M.
    Katic, M.
    Gabric, D.
    Anic, I.
    INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2019, 52 (01) : 105 - 113
  • [32] Apically extruded debris of different file systems used with various kinematic movements during retreatment: An in vitro study
    Kosar, Tugba
    Celik, Davut
    Tasdemir, Tamer
    AUSTRALIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2023, 49 : 33 - 40
  • [33] Efficacy of ProTaper Universal Rotary Retreatment System for Gutta-percha Removal from Oval Root Canals: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study
    Ma, Jingzhi
    Al-Ashaw, Ahmed Jawad
    Shen, Ya
    Gao, Yuan
    Yang, Yan
    Zhang, Chengfei
    Haapasalo, Markus
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2012, 38 (11) : 1516 - 1520
  • [34] Efficacy of Various Heat-treated Retreatment File Systems on Dentin Removal and Crack Analysis: An in vitro Study
    Suresh, Swathi
    Solete, Pradeep
    Antony, Delphine Priscilla
    Teja, Kavalipurapu Venkata
    Sandeep, Adimulapu Hima
    Sairaman, Sruthi
    Minervini, Giuseppe
    Cicciu, Marco
    PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA, 2024, 24
  • [35] Effect of Ultrasonic Combined with Solvent on Gutta-Percha and Bioceramic Sealer Removal in Middle and Apical Third of the Root Canal: An ex vivo study
    Fibryanto, Eko
    Widyastuti, Wiena
    Hidayat, Adi
    Hastuty, Lisiana
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY INDONESIA, 2024, 31 (01)
  • [36] Effectiveness of H-files and Pro-Taper universal systems in removing Gutta-percha during endodontic retreatment: A comparative study
    Atique, Sundus
    Ali, Kamran
    Haroon, Saad
    Ahmed, Alia
    Javed, Muhammad Q.
    Zafar, Muhammad S.
    Abulhamael, Ayman M.
    JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 19 (03): : 537 - 544
  • [37] Efficacy of D-RaCe and ProTaper Universal Retreatment NiTi instruments and hand files in removing gutta-percha from curved root canals - a micro-computed tomography study
    Roedig, T.
    Hausdoerfer, T.
    Konietschke, F.
    Dullin, C.
    Hahn, W.
    Huelsmann, M.
    INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2012, 45 (06) : 580 - 589
  • [38] The Comparative Efficacy of Different Files in The Removal of Different Sealers in Simulated Root Canal Retreatment- An In-vitro Study
    Kanaparthy, Aruna
    Kanaparthy, Rosaiah
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (05) : ZC130 - ZC133
  • [39] Microbial leakage of gutta-percha and Resilon™ root canal filling material:: A comparative study using a new homogeneous assay for sequence detection
    Pasqualini, Damum
    Scotti, Nicola
    Mollo, Livio
    Berutti, Elio
    Angelini, Emma
    Migliaretti, Giuseppe
    Cuffini, Annamaria
    Adlerstein, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS APPLICATIONS, 2008, 22 (04) : 337 - 352
  • [40] Evaluation of Dentinal Crack Propagation, Amount of Gutta Percha Remaining and Time Required during Removal of Gutta Percha Using Two Different Rotary Instruments and Hand Instruments - An In vitro Study
    Tejaswi, S.
    Singh, A.
    Manglekar, S.
    Ambikathanaya, U. K.
    Shetty, S.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 25 (04) : 524 - 530