The family size effect in visual and auditory word recognition

被引:0
作者
Muller, Hanno [1 ,2 ]
ten Bosch, Louis [1 ]
Ernestus, Mirjam [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Ctr Language Studies, Postbus 9103, NL-6500 HD Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Heinrich Heine Univ, English Language & Linguist, Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
family size; auditory word recognition; visual word recognition; lexical decision; morphological processing; EYE-MOVEMENTS; COMPREHENSION; FREQUENCY; DYNAMICS; MODEL; DUTCH; REGRESSION; LANGUAGE; TASKS; RICH;
D O I
10.1080/23273798.2024.2337941
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Words with larger morphological families elicit shorter response times in visual lexical decision, but in auditory lexical decision, family size effects have been reported to be facilitative, absent, or inhibitory. We revisit the auditory family size effect and different family size definitions by re-analysing data from two large lexical decision experiments. The results suggest that words with larger families elicit smaller response latencies not only in visual but also in auditory lexical decision. However, in auditory lexical decision, this effect is insignificant when the word contains a prefix. In both modalities, it is the degree of semantic similarity and the degree of form overlap between a word and its family members, rather than the mere presence of overlap, that seem to drive the family size effect.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 814
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The homophone effect during visual word recognition in children: an fMRI study
    Sharlene D. Newman
    Psychological Research, 2012, 76 : 280 - 291
  • [32] Visual phonology: The effects of orthographic consistency on different auditory word recognition tasks
    Johannes C. Ziegler
    Ludovic Ferrand
    Marie Montant
    Memory & Cognition, 2004, 32 : 732 - 741
  • [33] The Developmental Lexicon Project: A behavioral database to investigate visual word recognition across the lifespan
    Schroeter, Pauline
    Schroeder, Sascha
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2017, 49 (06) : 2183 - 2203
  • [34] Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words
    Yap, Melvin J.
    Balota, David A.
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2009, 60 (04) : 502 - 529
  • [35] Individual differences in spelling ability influence phonological processing during visual word recognition
    Yates, Mark
    Slattery, Timothy J.
    COGNITION, 2019, 187 : 139 - 149
  • [36] Selective Suppression of Taboo Information in Visual Word Recognition: Evidence for Cognitive Control on Semantics
    Scaltritti, Michele
    Job, Remo
    Sulpizio, Simone
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2021, 47 (07) : 934 - 945
  • [37] An orthographic prediction error as the basis for efficient visual word recognition
    Gagl, Benjamin
    Sassenhagen, Jona
    Haan, Sophia
    Gregorova, Klara
    Richlan, Fabio
    Fiebach, Christian J.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2020, 214
  • [38] Lexical competition influences correct and incorrect visual word recognition
    Gregg, Julie
    Inhoff, Albrecht W.
    Li, Xingshan
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 76 (05) : 1011 - 1025
  • [39] Masked Translation Priming Effects in Visual Word Recognition by Trilinguals
    Aparicio, Xavier
    Lavaur, Jean-Marc
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 45 (06) : 1369 - 1388
  • [40] The time course of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition
    Rabovsky, Milena
    Sommer, Werner
    Rahman, Rasha Abdel
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6