Comparison of two percutaneous nephrolithotomy methods for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones: Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy

被引:1
作者
Karkin, Kadir [1 ,4 ]
Aydamirov, Mubariz [2 ]
Aksay, Bugra [1 ]
Kaplan, Eyuep [3 ]
Gurlen, Guclu [1 ]
Altunkol, Adem [1 ]
Ortaoglu, Ferhat [1 ]
Akgun, Omer Faruk [1 ]
Vuruskan, Ediz [1 ]
Gurbuz, Zafer Gokhan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Sci Univ, Adana City Training & Res Hosp, Urol Clin, Adana, Turkiye
[2] Baskent Univ, Alanya Applicat & Res Ctr, Alanya, Turkiye
[3] Abdulkadir Yuksel State Hosp, Urol Clin, Gaziantep, Turkiye
[4] Hlth Sci Univ, Adana City Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Adana, Turkiye
关键词
Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Pediatric Kidney Stones; PRESCHOOL AGE CHILDREN; COMPLICATIONS; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; INFANTS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.4081/aiua.2024.12369
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: In this study, the aim was to compare the results of mini and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones. Materials and Methods: Data for 128 patients < 18 years of age who underwent mini and standard PCNL due to pediatric kidney stones were retrospectively examined. Patients were divided into two groups: mini-PCNL (16-20 Fr) and standard PCNL (26 Fr). Surgery time, number of punctures to the pelvicalyceal system, hospital stay, postoperative hemoglobin drop, complications and stone-free status (SFR) were compared between the groups. Additional surgical intervention (double-J stent, ureterorenoscopy, secondary PCNL) performed after the surgery was recorded. The absence of residual stones or < 3 mm residual stones on kidney, ureter and bladder radiography (KUB) and ultrasonography (USG) performed in the third postoperative month were accepted as success criteria. Results: There were 32 (43.8%) patients in the mini-PCNL group and 41 (56.2%) patients in the standard PCNL group. The mean age was 9.3 +/- 4.1 years in the mini-PCNL group and 10.1 +/- 5.4 years in the standard PCNL group. Mean stone size in the mini-PCNL group was 2.1 +/- 1.2; while for standard PCNL it was 2.3 +/- 1.4. The mean surgery time was statistically significantly higher in the mini-PCNL group (p = 0.005). There was no difference between the groups in terms of intraoperative double J stent use, postoperative complications and SFR. A double J stent was inserted in two patients in the mini-PCNL group and in one patient in the standard PCNL group due to urine leakage from the nephrostomy tract in the postoperative period. Although the postoperative hemoglobin drop was found to be significantly higher in standard PCNL (p = 0.001), hematuria and blood transfusion rates were low in both groups. Mean hospital stay was shorter in the mini-PCNL group compared to standard PCNL (3.6 +/- 1.2 days vs. 2.5 +/- 1.1; p = 0.018). Conclusions: Although mini-PCNL has longer surgery time compared to standard PCNL, it should be preferred for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones due to advantages such as similar success and complication rates to standard PCNL, short hospital stay and less postoperative hemoglobin drop.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   The importance of instrument type in paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J].
Altintas, Ramazan ;
Oguz, Fatih ;
Tasdemir, Cemal ;
Beytur, Ali ;
Cimen, Serhan ;
Gunes, Ali ;
Colak, Cemil .
UROLITHIASIS, 2014, 42 (02) :149-153
[2]   Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children:: Lessons learned in 5 years at a single institution [J].
Bilen, Cenk Yucel ;
Kocak, Burak ;
Kitirci, Gurcan ;
Ozkaya, Ozan ;
Sarikaya, Saban .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (05) :1867-1871
[3]   Comparison of the results of pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy with different sized instruments [J].
Celik, Huseyin ;
Camtosun, Ahmet ;
Dede, Onur ;
Dagguli, Mansur ;
Altintas, Ramazan ;
Tasdemir, Cemal .
UROLITHIASIS, 2017, 45 (02) :203-208
[4]   Efficiency of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients using adult-type instruments [J].
Dogan, Bayram ;
Atmaca, Ali Fuat ;
Canda, Abdullah Erdem ;
Isgoren, Abidin Egemen ;
Akbulut, Ziya ;
Balbay, Mevlana Derya .
UROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 40 (03) :259-262
[5]   Minimal invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) in children: Ultrasound versus fluoroscopic guidance [J].
Eslahi, Ali ;
Ahmed, Faisal ;
Hosseini, Mohammad Mehdi ;
Rezaeimehr, Mohammad Reza ;
Fathi, Nazanin ;
Nikbakht, Hossein-Ali ;
Askarpour, Mohammad Reza ;
Hosseini, Seyed Hossein ;
Al-Naggar, Khalil .
ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2021, 93 (02) :173-177
[6]   A critical appraisal of complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in paediatric patients using adult instruments [J].
Goyal, Neeraj Kumar ;
Goel, Apul ;
Sankhwar, Satya Narayan ;
Singh, Vishwajeet ;
Singh, Bhupendra Pal ;
Sinha, Rahul Janak ;
Dalela, Divakar ;
Yadav, Rahul .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 (05) :801-810
[7]   Successful Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Children: Multicenter Study on Current Status of its Use, Efficacy and Complications Using Clavien Classification [J].
Guven, Selcuk ;
Istanbulluoglu, Okan ;
Gul, Umit ;
Ozturk, Ahmet ;
Celik, Huseyin ;
Aygun, Cem ;
Ozdemir, Umit ;
Ozturk, Bulent ;
Ozkardes, Hakan ;
Kilinc, Mehmet .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04) :1419-1424
[8]   Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000 [J].
Hesse, A ;
Brändle, E ;
Wilbert, D ;
Köhrmann, KU ;
Alken, P .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 44 (06) :709-713
[9]   Which factors affect the success of pediatric PCNL? Single center experience over 20 years [J].
Izol, Volkan ;
Satar, Nihat ;
Bayazit, Yildirim ;
Gokalp, Fatih ;
Akdogan, Nebil ;
Aridogan, Ibrahim Atilla .
ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2020, 92 (04) :345-349
[10]   Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool age children: Experience with a new technique [J].
Jackman, SV ;
Hedican, SP ;
Peters, CA ;
Docimo, SG .
UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (04) :697-701