Tiering biodiversity issues from strategic environmental assessment to environmental impact assessment: exploring documentary evidence from Brazil and England

被引：5
作者：
Gallardo, Amarilis Lucia Casteli Figueiredo [1 ,2 ]
Bond, Alan [3 ,4 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Escola Politecn, Ave Prof Almeida Prado 83, BR-05508070 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Nove De Julho Uninove, Smart & Sustainable Cities Program, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ East Anglia UEA, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich, England
[4] North West Univ, Res Unit Environm Sci & Management, Potchefstroom, South Africa
来源：
IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL | 2024年 / 42卷 / 03期
基金：
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词：
Tiering; strategic environmental assessment; environmental impact assessment; biodiversity; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; PLANNING LESSONS; OFFSHORE OIL; SAO-PAULO; SEA; FRAMEWORK; EIA;
D O I：
10.1080/14615517.2024.2368326
中图分类号：
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号：
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要：
Biodiversity protection is one of the key goals for Environmental Assessment (EA) practice that can most efficiently be achieved through tiering of environmental objectives between Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of sectoral and land use plans and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of projects. This research uses an analytical framework to benchmark some examples of tiering of biodiversity objectives using documentary case studies from Brazil and the United Kingdom; these suggest that EA tiering might still be very limited despite all recommendations to improve it, thereby impacting on the efficiency with which biodiversity goals can be achieved.
引用
收藏
页码：281 / 293
页数：13
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, European Commission Green Paper Luxembourg also known as Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) or Blair House Agreement
[2]  
Arts J., 2011, Handbook of strategic environmental assessment, P415, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781849775434
[3]  
Arts J., 2012, 32 ANN M IAIA MAY PO
[4]   Taking an environmental ethics perspective to understand what we should expect from EIA in terms of biodiversity protection [J].
Bond, Alan ;
Pope, Jenny ;
Morrison-Saunders, Angus ;
Retief, Francois .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2021, 86
[5]   Characterising the collaboration between academia and practice in UK environmental assessment [J].
Bond, Alan J. ;
Fischer, Thomas B. .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2022, 97
[6]  
Brownlie S., 2018, SPECIAL PUBLICATION
[7]   Urban planning as an enabler of urban health: Challenges and good practice in England following the 2012 planning and public health reforms [J].
Carmichael, Laurence ;
Townshend, Tim G. ;
Fischer, Thomas B. ;
Lock, Karen ;
Petrokofsky, Carl ;
Sheppard, Adam ;
Sweeting, David ;
Ogilvie, Flora .
LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 84 :154-162
[8]   Strategic environmental assessment in tourism planning - Extent of application and quality of documentation [J].
Carvalho Lemos, Clara ;
Fischer, Thomas B. ;
Pereira Souza, Marcelo .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2012, 35 :1-10
[9]   Addressing ecosystem services from plan to project to further tiering in impact assessment: Lessons from highway planning in Sa∼o Paulo, Brazil [J].
Casteli Figueiredo Gallardo, Amarilis Lucia ;
Sales Rosa, Josianne Claudia ;
Sanchez, Luis Enrique .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2022, 92
[10]   Analysis of fractal dimension of mixed Riemann-Liouville integral [J].
Chandra, Subhash ;
Abbas, Syed .
NUMERICAL ALGORITHMS, 2022, 91 (03) :1021-1046
1234567