Regular HbA1c examination and health outcomes in adult patients with type 2 diabetes in South Korea: A retrospective cohort study

被引:1
作者
Hong, Jae-Seok [1 ]
Kang, Hee-Chung [2 ]
机构
[1] Cheongju Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Healthcare Management, Cheongju, South Korea
[2] Korea Inst Hlth & Social Affairs KIHASA, Dept Hlth Care Policy Res, Bldg D,370 Sicheong Daero, Sejong City 30147, South Korea
关键词
glycated hemoglobin A1c; Primary care; quality of health care; type; 2; diabetes; AMBULATORY-CARE; HOSPITALIZATION; CONTINUITY; ADHERENCE; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000038662
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Concerns have been raised about the effectiveness of using process-centered indicators to assess the quality of diabetes care in Korea. This study aims to examine the factors influencing the performance of regular HbA1c testing and to explore its association with health outcomes, including hospitalization and mortality. We utilized a retrospective cohort design with a 4-year follow-up period, involving 159,452 adult patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (E11 in International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition) in 2011. We established a national population database by merging the Korea National Health Insurance (KNHI) claims database and the KNHI Qualification Database of South Korea. The proportion of diabetic patients who underwent regular HbA1c testing at least once a year in the first 3 years was determined to be 33.8%. In comparison, patients who did not receive regular tests during the same period exhibited significantly increased odds of hospitalization (diabetes/CVD/renal, OR, 1.23, 95% CI, 1.12-1.34; diabetes, OR, 1.36, 95% CI, 1.17-1.57). Additionally, this nonpatient group experienced a higher risk of mortality (OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.36-1.80). This study supports the positive impact of regular HbA1c testing on health outcomes for individuals with type 2 diabetes. To increase the current 33% rate of regular HbA1c testing, developing patient-customized management policies is essential. Priority should be given to diabetic patients aged 65 or older, living in rural areas, and those belonging to low-income families (medical aid).
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2004, Rockville: Diabetes care quality improvement: A Resource Guide for state action
[2]  
American Diabetes Association, 2020, Clin Diabetes, V38, P10, DOI [10.2337/cd20-as01, 10.2337/cd20-as01]
[3]  
[Anonymous], Global report on diabetes
[4]  
[Anonymous], National Institute of Diabetes and digestive and kidney diseases. The A1C test Diabetes
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, DESIGNATION D7012 13, P1
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, DIABETES CARE, V39
[7]  
Australian Government, Practice Incentives Program. Diabetes Incentive
[8]  
Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, 2020, 2019 Healthcare quality assessment report (Korean), P113
[9]   Relationship Between Oral Antihyperglycemic Medication Adherence and Hospitalization, Mortality, and Healthcare Costs in Adult Ambulatory Care Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in South Korea [J].
Hong, Jae Seok ;
Kang, Hee Chung .
MEDICAL CARE, 2011, 49 (04) :378-384
[10]   Continuity of Care for Elderly Patients with Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Asthma, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Korea [J].
Hong, Jae Seok ;
Kang, Hee Chung ;
Kim, Jaiyong .
JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 25 (09) :1259-1271