Flexible work arrangements in collective agreements: evidence from Spain and the Netherlands

被引:0
作者
Brega, Carla [1 ]
Besamusca, Janna [1 ]
Yerkes, Mara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Interdisciplinary Social Sci, Padualaan 14, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Collective agreements; flexible work arrangements; Spain; The Netherlands; work-family policy; LIFE BALANCE; FAMILY POLICIES; TRADE-UNIONS; ACCESS; TIME; FLEXIBILITY; INEQUALITY; DYNAMICS; ADOPTION; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1080/13668803.2024.2353650
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Collective labour agreements are an understudied yet key aspect of flexible work policies, which are crucial resources for workers in combining work, family and other life domains. Despite a rich comparative work-family literature on flexible work arrangements at the company and national levels, little attention has been given to those negotiated collectively. Evidence on this topic is needed because such agreements can complement low levels of provision or even compensate the absence of company or national-level arrangements, ultimately defining their access. We contribute in filling this gap by conducting a cross-sectoral comparative exploration of collectively bargained provisions of flexible work arrangements in Spain and the Netherlands. We examine the clauses of 209 agreements using unique collective bargaining data from WageIndicator (2021). The analyses illustrate two important aspects of collectively bargained 'family-friendly' provisions. First, how differences in national baseline legislation shape opportunity structures for collective innovation around flexible work arrangements. Second, how sectoral variations appear to be primarily influenced by the representation of workers in high-skilled jobs, particularly when supported by high union density, rather than the share of female workers. We discuss the implications of these findings for workers' work-family reconciliation and future work-family research.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 82 条
[51]  
Jansen N., 2021, COLBAR-EUROPE Report 4: Collective bargainin in the Netherlands, P1
[52]   Non-standard work arrangements and national context [J].
Kassinis, George I. ;
Stavrou, Eleni T. .
EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 31 (05) :464-477
[53]  
Kelly ErinL., 2006, SOCIO-ECON REV, V4, P379, DOI 10.1093/ser/mwl001
[54]   Workplace Flexibility and Worker Well-Being by Gender [J].
Kim, Jaeseung ;
Henly, Julia R. ;
Golden, Lonnie M. ;
Lambert, Susan J. .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2020, 82 (03) :892-910
[55]   The discourse of diversity in unionised contexts: views from trade union equality officers [J].
Kirton, Gill ;
Greene, Anne-Marie .
PERSONNEL REVIEW, 2006, 35 (04) :431-448
[56]   Union framing of gender equality and the elusive potential of equality bargaining in a difficult climate [J].
Kirton, Gill .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2021, 63 (04) :591-613
[57]   Women's Opportunities under Different Family Policy Constellations: Gender, Class, and Inequality Tradeoffs in Western Countries Re-examined [J].
Korpi, Walter ;
Ferrarini, Tommy ;
Englund, Stefan .
SOCIAL POLITICS, 2013, 20 (01) :1-40
[58]   WORK-LIFE FLEXIBILITY FOR WHOM? OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND WORK-LIFE INEQUALITY IN UPPER, MIDDLE, AND LOWER LEVEL JOBS [J].
Kossek, Ellen Ernst ;
Lautsch, Brenda A. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2018, 12 (01) :5-36
[59]   Gendered Effects of Home-Based Work on Parents' Capability to Balance Work with Non-work: Two Countries with Different Models of Division of Labour Compared [J].
Kurowska, Anna .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2020, 151 (02) :405-425
[60]  
Lambert S.J., 2004, COMMUNITY WORK FAMIL, V7, P179