Modified pedicle screw-rod fixation versus open reduction plate fixation for the management of pubic symphysis diastasis: A retrospective study

被引:0
|
作者
Bi, Chun [1 ]
Yin, Gang [1 ]
Cao, Lei [1 ]
Lin, Haodong [1 ]
Wang, Jiandong [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped Trauma, Sch Med,Trauma Ctr, 650 Xin Songjiang Rd, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China
关键词
Modified pedicle screw-rod fixation; Open reduction plate fixation; Pubic symphysis diastasis; PELVIC RING DISRUPTIONS; INTERNAL-FIXATION; EXTERNAL FIXATION; FRACTURES; MOBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jor.2024.05.025
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Surgical intervention and fixation is the recognized measurement to treat pubic symphysis diastasis caused by high-energy trauma. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the clinical application of modified pedicle screw-rod fixation (modified PSRF) and open reduction plate fixation (ORPF) for treating pubic symphysis diastasis. Methods: The data of this retrospective analysis were collected from 32 patients with pubic symphysis diastasis managed with modified PSRF or ORPF from January 2012 to December 2017, with or without posterior fixation. Indicators of clinical assessments including operating time, intraoperative blood loss, relevant surgical complications as well as follow-up were recorded. Majeed scores were performed for functional evaluation, as well as Matta criteria were applied to evaluate the quality of reduction. Results: The average time from injury to operation was 2.9 days in modified PSRF group and 3.2 days in ORPF group. Significant differences regarding average operation time (41.8 min versus 64.3 min) and average intraoperative blood loss (46.6 ml versus 304.6 ml) were presented between modified PSRF groups and ORPF group. Neither Majeed scores nor Matta evaluation showed a significant difference between two groups. In ORPF group, the incision infection occurred in one patient and two patients developed loosening of screws. In modified PSRF group, loosening of screws was found in one patient during the operative procedure and one patient experienced femoral nerve palsy. Irritation to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) was detected in two patients in modified PSRF group. Conclusions: Satisfactory clinical outcomes were provided with applications of both fixation methods for treating pubic symphysis diastasis. Modified PSRF, as a minimal invasive technique, could serve as an effective and reasonable option for treating pubic symphysis diastasis. Level of evidence: III: retrospective cohort study. Trial registration: researchregistry3906.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 34
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Computed tomography-based three-dimensional visualisation of bone corridors and trajectories for screws in open reduction and internal fixation of symphysis diastasis: a retrospective radiological study
    Christian Michelitsch
    Thi Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim
    Thorsten Jentzsch
    Hans-Peter Simmen
    Clément M. L. Werner
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2016, 136 : 1673 - 1681
  • [32] Modified pedicle screw–rod fixation as a minimally invasive treatment for anterior pelvic ring injuries: an initial case series
    Xiaotian Wu
    Zuoqing Liu
    Wenqin Fu
    Shan Zhao
    Juntao Feng
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 12
  • [33] Comparison of Biomechanical Characteristics and Pelvic Ring Stability Using Different Fixation Methods to Treat Pubic Symphysis Diastasis A Finite Element Study
    Yao, Feng
    He, Yu
    Qian, Hebu
    Zhou, Dongsheng
    Li, Qinghu
    MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (49)
  • [34] Comparative study of the closed reduction percutaneous cannulated screw fixation and open reduction palmar locking plate fixation in the treatment of AO type A2 distal radius fractures
    Gereli, Arel
    Nalbantoglu, Ufuk
    Kocaoglu, Baris
    Turkmen, Metin
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2014, 134 (01) : 121 - 129
  • [35] Open reduction internal fixation versus percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation for unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions
    Elzohairy, M. M.
    Salama, A. M.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2017, 103 (02) : 223 - 227
  • [36] External fixation versus open reduction with plate fixation for distal radius fractures: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Esposito, John
    Schemitsch, Emil H.
    Saccone, Michel
    Sternheim, Amir
    Kuzyk, Paul R. T.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2013, 44 (04): : 409 - 416
  • [37] Closed Reduction Percutaneous Pinning Versus Open Reduction With Plate and Screw Fixation in Management of Unstable Proximal Phalangeal Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Gaio, Natalie M.
    Kruse, Lisa M.
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2025, 20 (01): : 136 - 142
  • [38] Management of Gunshot Injuries of Mandible with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation versus Closed Reduction and Maxillo-mandibular Fixation
    Muddassar, Muhammad
    Arshad, Rizwan
    Rabbani, Sarah
    Qureshi, Imran S.
    Khattak, Imran K.
    Rana, Zahoor
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [39] Open reduction internal fixation versus external fixation with limited internal fixation for displaced comminuted closed pilon fractures: A randomised prospective study
    Ahmed, Rayan
    Ahmed, Kotb
    Elhussein, Elmoatasem M.
    Shady, Samir
    Tamer, El-Sobky A.
    Ezzat, El-Hawi
    Mahmoud, Mahran
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMA AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 24 : 84 - 89
  • [40] A biomechanical study of standard posterior pelvic ring fixation versus a posterior pedicle screw construct
    Vigdorchik, Jonathan M.
    Jin, Xin
    Sethi, Anil
    Herzog, Darren T.
    Oliphant, Bryant W.
    Yang, King H.
    Vaidya, Rahul
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2015, 46 (08): : 1491 - 1496