Social Media Misinformation about Pregnancy and COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review

被引:7
作者
Malik, Mahnoor [1 ,2 ]
Bauer-Maison, Natasha [1 ,3 ]
Guarna, Giuliana [1 ]
D'Souza, Rohan D. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Michael G DeGroote Sch Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal & Fetal Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Social media; Misinformation; COVID-19; vaccines; Vaccination hesitancy; Pregnancy; SERIES;
D O I
10.1159/000538346
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The objectives of this study were to identify common social media misconceptions about COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, explain the spread of misinformation, and identify solutions to guide clinical practice and policy. Methodology: A systematic review was conducted and the databases Embase and Medline were searched from December 2019 to February 8, 2023, using terms related to social media, pregnancy, COVID-19 vaccines and misinformation. The inclusion criteria were original research studies that discussed misinformation about COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy on social media. The exclusion criteria were review articles, no full text, and not published in English. Two independent reviewers conducted screening, extraction, and quality assessment. Results: Our search identified 76 articles, of which 3 fulfilled eligibility criteria. Included studies were of moderate and high quality. The social media platforms investigated included Facebook, Google Searches, Instagram, Reddit, TikTok, and Twitter. Misinformation was related to concerns regarding vaccine safety, and its association with infertility. Misinformation was increased due to lack of content monitoring on social media, exclusion of pregnant women from early vaccine trials, lack of information from reputable health sources on social media, and others. Suggested solutions were directed at pregnancy care providers (PCPs) and public health/government. Suggestions included: (i) integrating COVID-19 vaccination information into antenatal care, (ii) PCPs and public health should increase their social media presence to disseminate information, (iii) address population-specific vaccine concerns in a culturally relevant manner, and others. Conclusion: Increased availability of information from reputable health sources through multiple channels could increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the pregnant population and help combat misinformation.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 241
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Risk of bias assessment in JBI systematic reviews: a new series of articles in JBI Evidence Synthesis
    Aromataris, Edoardo
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2023, 21 (03) : 465 - 466
  • [2] US Physicians' and Nurses' Motivations, Barriers, and Recommendations for Correcting Health Misinformation on Social Media: Qualitative Interview Study
    Bautista, John Robert
    Zhang, Yan
    Gwizdka, Jacek
    [J]. JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2021, 7 (09):
  • [3] "Tell us what's going on": Exploring the information needs of pregnant and post-partum women in Australia during the pandemic with 'Tweets', 'Threads', and women's views
    Caddy, Cassandra
    Cheong, Marc
    Lim, Megan S. C.
    Power, Robert
    Vogel, Joshua P. P.
    Bradfield, Zoe
    Coghlan, Benjamin
    Homer, Caroline S. E.
    Wilson, Alyce N. N.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [4] Chen E., 2021, HARVARD KENNEDY SCH, V1
  • [5] Evaluating perinatal outcomes during a pandemic: A role for living systematic reviews
    D'Souza, Rohan
    Malhame, Isabelle
    Shah, Prakesh S.
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2022, 101 (01) : 4 - 6
  • [6] Safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy
    Ellington, Sascha
    Olson, Christine K.
    [J]. LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 22 (11) : 1514 - 1515
  • [7] Temporal trends and determinants of COVID-19 vaccine coverage and series initiation during pregnancy in Ontario, Canada, December 2020 to December 2021: A population-based retrospective cohort study
    Fell, Deshayne B.
    Toeroek, Eszter
    Sprague, Ann E.
    Regan, Annette K.
    Dhinsa, Tavleen
    Alton, Gillian D.
    Dimanlig-Cruz, Sheryll
    MacDonald, Shannon E.
    Buchan, Sarah A.
    Kwong, Jeffrey C.
    Wilson, Sarah E.
    Haberg, Siri E.
    Gravel, Christopher A.
    Wilson, Kumanan
    Dunn, Sandra I.
    Shah, Prakesh S.
    El-Chaar, Darine
    Barrett, Jon
    Walker, Mark C.
    Okun, Nannette
    Dougan, Shelley D.
    [J]. VACCINE, 2023, 41 (10) : 1716 - 1725
  • [8] Misinformation, manipulation, and abuse on social media in the era of COVID-19
    Ferrara, Emilio
    Cresci, Stefano
    Luceri, Luca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 3 (02): : 271 - 277
  • [9] COVID-19 Vaccine in Pregnant and Lactating Women: A Review of Existing Evidence and Practice Guidelines
    Garg, Ishan
    Shekhar, Rahul
    Sheikh, Abu B.
    Pal, Suman
    [J]. INFECTIOUS DISEASE REPORTS, 2021, 13 (03) : 685 - 699
  • [10] Nurses' use of social media during the COVID-19 pandemic-A scoping review
    Glasdam, Stinne
    Sandberg, Helena
    Stjernsward, Sigrid
    Jacobsen, Frode F.
    Gronning, Anette H.
    Hybholt, Lisbeth
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (02):