The application of propensity score methods in observational studies

被引:0
作者
Zhao, Yuejuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Sch Data Sci, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
propensity score; observational study; confounding variable; treatment effect; linear regression; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.3389/fams.2024.1384217
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Introduction In research, it is crucial to accurately estimate treatment effects and analyze experimental results. Common methods include comparing outcome differences between different groups and using linear regression models for analysis. However, observational studies may have significantly different distributions of confounding variables between control and treatment groups, leading to errors in estimating treatment effects.Methods The propensity score methods can address this issue by weighting or matching samples to approximate the scenario of a randomized experiment and allow for more accurate estimation of treatment this paper.Results We use propensity score methods to analyze three datasets from observational studies and draw conclusions different from those in the original text. Furthermore, we simulate three scenarios, and the results demonstrate the superiority of propensity score methods over methods such as linear regression in addressing selection bias.Discussion Therefore, it is essential to thoroughly consider the characteristics of the data and select appropriate methods to ensure reliable conclusions in practical data analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Propensity score methods in the surgical oncology literature
    Akmal, Sarfraz R.
    Beier, Matthew A.
    August, David A.
    [J]. SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2022, 42
  • [42] The use of propensity score methods in psychiatric research
    VanderWeele, Tyler
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2006, 15 (02) : 95 - 103
  • [43] Do the observational studies using propensity score analysis agree with randomized controlled trials in the area of sepsis?
    Zhang, Zhongheng
    Ni, Hongying
    Xu, Xiao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 29 (05) : 886.e9 - 886.e15
  • [44] Combining propensity score matching and group-based trajectory analysis in an observational study
    Haviland, Amelia
    Nagin, Daniel S.
    Rosenbaum, Paul R.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2007, 12 (03) : 247 - 267
  • [45] Propensity score for the analysis of observational data: An introduction and an illustrative example
    Cavuto, S.
    Bravi, F.
    Grassi, M. C.
    Apolone, G.
    [J]. DRUG DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, 2006, 67 (03) : 208 - 216
  • [46] Causal inference with observational data: A tutorial on propensity score analysis
    Narita, Kaori
    Tena, J. D.
    Detotto, Claudio
    [J]. LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2023, 34 (03)
  • [47] The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios
    Austin, Peter C.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (16) : 2837 - 2849
  • [48] Propensity Score Methods for Analyzing Observational Data Like Randomized Experiments: Challenges and Solutions for Rare Outcomes and Exposures
    Ross, Michelle E.
    Kreider, Amanda R.
    Huang, Yuan-Shung
    Matone, Meredith
    Rubin, David M.
    Localio, A. Russell
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 181 (12) : 989 - 995
  • [49] Propensity Score Methods for Confounding Control in Nonexperimental Research
    Brookhart, M. Alan
    Wyss, Richard
    Layton, J. Bradley
    Stuerner, Til
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2013, 6 (05): : 604 - 611
  • [50] The use and quality of reporting of propensity score methods in multiple sclerosis literature: A review
    Karim, Mohammad Ehsanul
    Pellegrini, Fabio
    Platt, Robert W.
    Simoneau, Gabrielle
    Rouette, Julie
    de Moor, Carl
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2022, 28 (09) : 1317 - 1323