Menstrual cup use and intrauterine device expulsion in a copper intrauterine device randomized trial

被引:2
|
作者
Brown, Jill E. [1 ]
Creinin, Mitchell D. [2 ]
Wu, Hongsheng [3 ]
Hubacher, David [4 ]
Schreiber, Courtney A. [5 ]
Kaneshiro, Bliss [6 ]
Nanda, Kavita [4 ]
Blithe, Diana L. [7 ]
机构
[1] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Gynecol Surg & Obstet, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[2] Univ Calif Sacramento, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sacramento, CA USA
[3] Premier Res, Biostat Sci, Morrisville, NC USA
[4] Contracept Technol Innovat Initiat, FHI 360, Durham, NC USA
[5] Penn Med Univ City, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] Univ Hawaii, John A Burns Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Honolulu, HI USA
[7] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Huma, Contracept Dev Program, Div Populat Hlth Res, Bethesda, MD USA
关键词
Copper IUD; Expulsion; Menstrual cup; Nulliparas; Randomized trial; SYSTEM; PARITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110415
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate menstrual cup use and intrauterine device (IUD) expulsion. Study design: We performed a secondary analysis of a 3-year contraceptive efficacy trial comparing two copper 380 mm(2) IUDs. Investigators randomized participants approximately 1:4 to the TCu380A or NTCu380-Mini IUD. Approximately 12 months after enrollment began, we advised participants against menstrual cup use due to observed IUD expulsions in cup users. We evaluated IUD expulsion (including spontaneous partial and complete expulsion and accidental self-removal) at 12 and 36 months. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate IUD expulsion by age, baseline menstrual volume, body mass index, IUD type, menstrual cup use, parity, and uterine length. Results: This analysis included 1046 participants (203 TCu380A and 843 NTCu380-Mini), with 879 (84.0%) nulliparas. Through 12 and 36 months, expulsion occurred in 74 (7.1%, 95% CI 5.5-8.6%) and 133 (12.7%, 95% CI 10.7-14.7%) participants, respectively. Overall, 250 (23.9%) reported menstrual cup use. More menstrual cup users than non-users experienced expulsion through 12 months (32/ 203 [15.8%] vs. 42/843 [5.0%]) and 36 months (58/250 [23.2%] vs. 75/796 [9.4%]). Through 36 months, NTCu380-Mini menstrual cup users had higher expulsion odds, while TCu380A cup users did not. Menstrual cup users more frequently experienced accidental self-removal than non-users in participants using the TCu380A (3/53 [5.7%] vs. 0/150 [0.0%]) and the NTCu380-Mini (20/197 [10.2%] vs. 7/ 646 [1.1%]). In multivariable regression, we found increased odds of expulsion through 36 months in participants using menstrual cups with the NTCu380-Mini (aOR 3.13, 95% CI 1.16-8.46) and < 25 years (aOR 1.59, 95% CI 1.07-2.34). Conclusions: We found higher odds of IUD expulsion with menstrual cup and concurrent NTCu380-Mini IUD use over 36 months of use, but not with concurrent TCu380A IUD use. Menstrual cup users experienced higher likelihood of accidental self-removal regardless of IUD type. Implications: Menstrual cup and NTCu380-Mini use may increase IUD expulsion risk and may increase accidental self-removal risk with TCu380A and NTCu380-Mini use. Clinicians should advise patients of these risks and consider warning patients using an IUD shaped like the NTCu380-Mini (Nova-T frames) of expulsion risk with menstrual cup use.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intrauterine Device Use in Adolescents
    Hillard, Paula J. Adams
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2015, 57 (04) : 359 - 360
  • [22] Association between menorrhagia and risk of intrauterine device-related uterine perforation and device expulsion: results from the Association of Uterine Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Device study
    Getahun, Darios
    Fassett, Michael J.
    Gatz, Jennifer
    Armstrong, Mary Anne
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    Raine-Bennett, Tina
    Reed, Susan D.
    Zhou, Xiaolei
    Schoendorf, Juliane
    Postlethwaite, Debbie
    Shi, Jiaxiao M.
    Saltus, Catherine W.
    Wang, Jinyi
    Xie, Fagen
    Chiu, Vicki Y.
    Merchant, Maqdooda
    Alabaster, Amy
    Ichikawa, Laura E.
    Hunter, Shannon
    Im, Theresa M.
    Takhar, Harpreet S.
    Ritchey, Mary E.
    Chillemi, Giulia
    Pisa, Federica
    Asiimwe, Alex
    Anthony, Mary S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 227 (01) : 59.e1 - 59.e9
  • [23] Safety and continued use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system as compared with the copper intrauterine device among women living with HIV in South Africa: A randomized controlled trial
    Todd, Catherine S.
    Jones, Heidi E.
    Langwenya, Nontokozo
    Hoover, Donald R.
    Chen, Pai-Lien
    Petro, Gregory
    Myer, Landon
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2020, 17 (05)
  • [24] INTRAUTERINE-DEVICE, PROSTAGLANDINS, AND COPPER
    FORDER, JVH
    LANCET, 1974, 2 (7887): : 1009 - 1009
  • [25] CHEMICAL REACTIONS OF COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE
    OSTER, GK
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1972, 23 (01) : 18 - &
  • [26] Experience on Safety, Expulsion, and Complication of Intracesarean Post-Partum Intrauterine Copper Device
    Vishwakarma, Soniya
    Verma, Vandana
    Singh, Mamta
    Mittal, Nupur
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [27] When an Intrauterine Device Is Not Intrauterine
    Kumar, Santosh
    Murugavaithianathan, Pragatheeswarane
    Kalpesh, Parmar
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2016, 38 (05) : 423 - 423
  • [28] The intrauterine device and the intrauterine system
    Searle, E. Stephen
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 28 (06) : 807 - 824
  • [29] HEMOSTASIS IN MENSTRUAL ENDOMETRIUM IN THE PRESENCE OF AN INTRAUTERINE-DEVICE
    CHRISTIAENS, GCML
    SIXMA, JJ
    HASPELS, AA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1981, 88 (08): : 825 - 837
  • [30] HEMOSTASIS IN MENSTRUAL ENDOMETRIUM IN THE PRESENCE OF AN INTRAUTERINE-DEVICE
    CHRISTIAENS, GCML
    SIXMA, JJ
    HASPELS, AA
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1981, 24 (02): : 91 - 91