What Drives the Sustainability Reporting Intentions of Firms?

被引:0
|
作者
Ofori-Owusu, Charles [1 ]
Owusu, Godfred Matthew Yaw [1 ]
Agyenim-Boateng, Cletus [1 ]
Welbeck, Edem Emerald Sabah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghana Business Sch, Dept Accounting, POB LG 78, Accra, Ghana
关键词
theory of planned behaviour; sustainability reporting; sustainable development goals; developing countries; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; MANAGERIAL PERCEPTIONS; DECISION-MAKING; COMMITMENT; VALIDITY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.3390/su16125052
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Global leaders have adopted sustainable development goals to address critical issues like climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution from both human activities and firms. Over the years, there has been a demand for stricter regulations, accountability, and improved sustainable business practices by stakeholders. In the field of accounting, voluntary disclosure of firms' sustainability efforts has become an important component of firm reporting architecture. Despite being a voluntary practice in many jurisdictions, sustainability reporting has become essential for firms to demonstrate their commitment to meeting sustainability goals, ensuring future growth, and achieving long-term success. This study examines firms' sustainability reporting intentions and further investigates the dominant factors that drive such intentions, relying on the extended version of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Data for the study were gathered from managers of member firms with the Association of Ghana Industries. Using a total of 518 valid responses, the study's hypotheses were tested employing the partial least square structural equation modelling technique. The results indicate that subjective norm, perceived behavioural control, dynamic capabilities, cultural tightness-looseness, sustainability commitment, and perceived benefit are good predictors of firms' sustainability reporting intentions. However, the results suggest an inverse relationship exists between attitude, perceived cost, and intention to engage in sustainability reporting. The findings highlight some of the critical factors driving sustainability reporting behaviour among firms.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What Drives Overseas Acquisitions by Indian Firms? A Behavioral Risk-Taking Perspective
    Chittoor, Raveendra
    Aulakh, Preet S.
    Ray, Sougata
    MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2015, 55 (02) : 255 - 275
  • [32] Ethical environment, accountability, and sustainability reporting: What is the connection in the hospitality and tourism industry?
    Hamrouni, Amal
    Karaman, Abdullah S.
    Kuzey, Cemil
    Uyar, Ali
    TOURISM ECONOMICS, 2023, 29 (03) : 664 - 695
  • [33] Sustainability Performance Reporting
    Rusu, Teodora Maria
    Odagiu, Antonia
    Pop, Horia
    Paulette, Laura
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (19)
  • [34] Corporate sustainability reporting
    Barker, Richard
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2025, 49
  • [35] Sustainability performance reporting in Ghana: the views of SMEs
    Owusu, Acheampong
    Tauringana, Venancio
    Asare, Nicholas
    SMALL ENTERPRISE RESEARCH, 2024, 31 (01): : 56 - 75
  • [36] Sustainability Reporting in Cooperatives
    Pritchard, Gamze Yakar
    Caliyurt, Kiymet Tunca
    RISKS, 2021, 9 (06)
  • [37] A framework for sustainability reporting
    Abeysekera, Indra
    SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 2022, 13 (06) : 1386 - 1409
  • [38] Sustainability reporting and investor sentiment. A sustainable development approach to Chinese-listed firms.
    Ul Abideen, Zain
    Fuling, Han
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 466
  • [39] In family firms we trust-Experimental evidence on the credibility of sustainability reporting: A replication study with extension
    Stutz, Adrian
    Schell, Sabrina
    Hack, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY BUSINESS STRATEGY, 2022, 13 (04)
  • [40] What determines the inclusion in a sustainability stock index? A panel data analysis for european firms
    Ziegler, Andreas
    Schroeder, Michael
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (04) : 848 - 856