Excimer versus Femtosecond Laser Assisted Penetrating Keratoplasty in Keratoconus and Fuchs Dystrophy: Intraoperative Pitfalls

被引:15
作者
El-Husseiny, Moatasem [1 ]
Seitz, Berthold [1 ]
Langenbucher, Achim [2 ]
Akhmedova, Elena [1 ]
Szentmary, Nora [1 ]
Hager, Tobias [1 ]
Tsintarakis, Themistoklis [1 ]
Janunts, Edgar [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saarland, Med Ctr UKS, Dept Ophthalmol, Homburg, Germany
[2] Univ Saarland, Expt Ophthalmol, Homburg, Germany
关键词
TREPHINATION; PERSPECTIVES; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1155/2015/645830
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To assess the intraoperative results comparing two non-mechanical laser assisted penetrating keratoplasty approaches in keratoconus and Fuchs dystrophy. Patients and Methods. 68 patients (age 18 to 87 years) with keratoconus or Fuchs dystrophy were randomly distributed to 4 groups. 35 eyes with keratoconus and 33 eyes with Fuchs dystrophy were treated with either excimer laser ([Exc] groups I and II) or femtosecond laser-assisted ([FLAK] groups III and IV) penetrating keratoplasty. Main intraoperative outcome measures included intraoperative decentration, need for additional interrupted sutures, alignment of orientation markers, and intraocular positive pressure (vis a tergo). Results. Intraoperative recipient decentration occurred in 4 eyes of groups III/IV but in none of groups I/II. Additional interrupted sutures were not necessary in groups I/II but in 5 eyes of groups III/IV. Orientation markers were all aligned in groups I/II but were partly misaligned in 8 eyes of groups III/IV. Intraocular positive pressure grade was recognized in 12 eyes of groups I/II and in 19 eyes of groups III/IV. In particular, in group III, severe vis a tergo occurred in 8 eyes. Conclusions. Intraoperative decentration, misalignment of the donor in the recipient bed, and need for additional interrupted sutures as well as high percentage of severe intraocular positive pressure were predominantly present in the femtosecond laser in keratoconus eyes.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Femtosecond laser versus manual dissection for top hat penetrating keratoplasty [J].
Bahar, I. ;
Kaiserman, I. ;
Lange, A. P. ;
Levinger, E. ;
Sansanayudh, W. ;
Singal, N. ;
Slomovic, A. R. ;
Rootman, D. S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 93 (01) :73-78
[2]   Femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty - Stability evaluation of different wound configurations [J].
Bahar, Irit ;
Kaiserman, Igor ;
McAllum, Penny ;
Rootman, David .
CORNEA, 2008, 27 (02) :209-211
[3]  
Birnbaum F, 2011, OPHTHALMOLOGE, V108, P807, DOI 10.1007/s00347-011-2334-9
[4]   Clinical results of 123 femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasties [J].
Birnbaum, Florian ;
Wiggermann, Antonia ;
Maier, Philip C. ;
Boehringer, Daniel ;
Reinhard, Thomas .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 251 (01) :95-103
[5]   The use of the femtosecond laser in penetrating keratoplasty [J].
Buratto, Lucio ;
Bohm, Elisabetta .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 143 (05) :737-742
[6]  
Cheng YYY, 2008, CORNEA, V27, P679, DOI 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31815bad0c
[7]   Intacs implantation using a femtosecond laser for management of keratoconus: Comparison of 306 cases in different stages [J].
Ertan, Aylin ;
Kamburoglu, Guenhal .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 34 (09) :1521-1526
[8]   Femtosecond laser-assisted corneal surgery [J].
Farid, Marjan ;
Steinert, Roger F. .
CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 21 (04) :288-292
[9]   Comparison of Penetrating Keratoplasty Performed with a Femtosecond Laser Zig-Zag Incision versus Conventional Blade Trephination [J].
Farid, Marjan ;
Steinert, Roger F. ;
Gaster, Ronald N. ;
Chamberlain, Winston ;
Lin, Amy .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 116 (09) :1638-1643
[10]  
HOFFMANN F, 1976, KLIN MONATSBL AUGENH, V169, P584