Using machine-learning methods in meta-analyses: An empirical application on consumer acceptance of meat alternatives

被引:3
作者
Sun, Jiayu [1 ]
Caputo, Vincenzina [1 ]
Taylor, Hannah [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Agr Food & Resource Econ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Econ Res Serv, Market & Trade Econ Div, USDA, Washington, DC USA
关键词
ASReview; machine learning; meat alternatives; meta-analysis; random forest regressions; GENETICALLY-MODIFIED FOOD; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; CULTURED MEAT; RANDOM FOREST; CLASSIFIER; SCIENCE; POWER; BIAS;
D O I
10.1002/aepp.13446
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Meta-analyses are widely used in various academic fields, including applied economics. However, the high labor intensity involved in paper searching and small sample sizes remain two dominant limiting factors. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies on consumer preferences for plant-based and lab-grown meat alternatives using machine-learning techniques at both the data collection and the data analysis phases. We demonstrated that machine learning reduces the workload in the manual title-abstract screen phase by 69% accounting for 24% of total workload in data collection. We also found that machine learning improves out-of-sample of sample prediction accuracy by 48-78 percentage points when compared to econometric model. Notably, we showed that integrating machine learning can also improve the predictive performance of econometric methods, thereby improving their out-of-sample predictions. Our empirical findings further revealed that demand for meat alternatives is higher among younger consumers, especially when the products displayed benefit information.
引用
收藏
页码:1506 / 1532
页数:27
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]   Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Boxall, P ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) :64-75
[2]  
Ali J., 2012, International Journal of Computer Science Issues, V9, P272, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781119544678.CH10
[3]   Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure [J].
Altmann, Andre ;
Tolosi, Laura ;
Sander, Oliver ;
Lengauer, Thomas .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2010, 26 (10) :1340-1347
[4]   Is India Ready for Alt-Meat? Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Meat Alternatives [J].
Arora, Rashmit S. ;
Brent, Daniel A. ;
Jaenicke, Edward C. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (11)
[5]   Are consumers willing to pay for in-vitro meat? An investigation of naming effects [J].
Asioli, Daniele ;
Bazzani, Claudia ;
Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 73 (02) :356-375
[6]  
Athey S., 2018, EC ARTIFICIAL INTELL, DOI [10.7208/9780226613475-023, DOI 10.7208/9780226613475-023]
[7]  
Babcock University, 2017, International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, V48, P128, DOI [10.14445/22312803/ijctt-v48p126, 10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V48P126, DOI 10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V48P126]
[8]   What you see may not be what you get: A brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models [J].
Babyak, MA .
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2004, 66 (03) :411-421
[9]   Machine learning algorithms for systematic review: reducing workload in a preclinical review of animal studies and reducing human screening error [J].
Bannach-Brown, Alexandra ;
Przybyla, Piotr ;
Thomas, James ;
Rice, Andrew S. C. ;
Ananiadou, Sophia ;
Liao, Jing ;
Macleod, Malcolm Robert .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (1)
[10]   Using meta-analysis for benefits transfer: Theory and practice [J].
Bergstrom, John C. ;
Taylor, Laura O. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 60 (02) :351-360