共 94 条
The usefulness of glycated albumin in patients with diabetes and renal disease: a scoping review
被引:0
作者:
Chume, Fernando Chimela
[1
,2
,3
]
Schiavenin, Luisa Gazzi
[3
]
Freitas, Priscila Aparecida Correa
[3
,4
]
Pimentel, Ana Laura
[3
,5
]
Camargo, Joiza Lins
[1
,3
,6
]
机构:
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande Do Sul, Grad Program Med Sci Endocrinol, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[2] Univ Zambeze, Fac Hlth Sci, Beira, Mozambique
[3] Hosp Clin Porto Alegre, Ctr Pesquisa Clin, Diabet & Metab Grp, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[4] Hosp Clin Porto Alegre HCPA, Lab Diag Div, Clin Biochem Unit, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[5] Nuvisan Pharm Serv, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[6] Hosp Clin Porto Alegre, Expt Res Ctr, Rua Ramiro Barcellos 2350, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词:
Glycated albumin (GA);
chronic kidney disease (CKD);
diabetes renal disease (DRD);
diabetes;
glycaemic control;
CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE;
PREDIALYSIS GLYCEMIC CONTROL;
GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION-RATE;
LONG-TERM SURVIVAL;
HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS;
ENZYMATIC METHOD;
CARDIOVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS;
INDEPENDENT PREDICTOR;
GLUCOSE CONTROL;
HEMOGLOBIN A1C;
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
R446 [实验室诊断];
R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号:
1001 ;
摘要:
Background: Diabetes kidney disease (DKD) is one of the main complications in patients with diabetes and good control of glycaemia is very important since earlier stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) is the traditional test for glycaemic monitoring nevertheless may be influenced by several pathophysiological conditions that limited its use in patients with CKD. Glycated albumin (GA) is a promising test as a potential marker of glycaemic control. This scoping review aimed to summarizes the evidences in the literature about the usefulness and limitations of GA as a glycaemic marker in diabetic patients with DKD. Methods: This is a review with a systematic search of literature. We searched PubMed (MEDLINE) for reports published up to May 2021 using the search terms related to diabetes, GA and renal disease combined. Results: Sixty-one studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis of this review. These studies were related to glycaemic control (n=27), outcomes (n=30), technical aspects of GA measurement (n=1), diabetes mellitus post -transplant (DMPT; n=1), and interfering factors in GA analysis (n=4). GA and HbA1c are similarly associated with glycaemia and may be used as indicators of glycaemic control. Furthermore, GA is associated with the risk of mortality in patients with diabetes undergoing dialysis and showed positive association with microvascular complications in patients with diabetes with early DKD. Conclusions: In conclusion, GA may be an alternative marker of glycaemic control when conditions that affect HbA1c are present and may be a promisor biomarker for the management of diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with and without CKD.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文