Spatiotemporal Prediction of Rainfall-induced Landslides Using Machine Learning Techniques

被引:0
作者
Xiong, Jun [1 ]
Pei, Te [2 ]
Qiu, Tong [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] CUNY City Coll, Dept Civil Engn, New York, NY 10031 USA
来源
GEOSHANGHAI INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2024, VOL 8 | 2024年 / 1337卷
关键词
Landslide; Landslide susceptibility mapping; Machine learning; Spatiotemporal analysis; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1088/1755-1315/1337/1/012007
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Landslides cause significant damage to infrastructure and loss of life. Landslide susceptibility map (LSM), as an important reference for landslide hazard assessment, indicates prone areas of landslides. However, conventional LSM only predicts the spatial distribution of potential landslides, which cannot fully explain the occurrence of landslides at different times. In the present study, a spatiotemporal LSM is conducted to predict landslides both in space and time. A landslide database containing 223 recorded landslide events in southwestern Pennsylvania is used. Fourteen topographic spatial factors and eight rainfall temporal factors are used for machine learning (ML). Four ML models are applied in the study, including Logistic regression (LR), Support vector machine (SVM), Random forest (RF), and Gradient boosting machine (GBM). The results show that through cross-validation, RF outperforms the other algorithms with a value 0.86 of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC score). The optimal model is used to generate spatiotemporal LSMs. It is concluded that by introducing spatial and temporal information simultaneously, ML models have the capability of learning the pattern of landslide occurrence both in space and time, providing an effective assessment tool to reduce catastrophic loss of landslide hazards.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning: A Literature Survey [J].
Ado, Moziihrii ;
Amitab, Khwairakpam ;
Maji, Arnab Kumar ;
Jasinska, Elzbieta ;
Gono, Radomir ;
Leonowicz, Zbigniew ;
Jasinski, Michal .
REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (13)
[2]   A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: a case study at Izmir, Turkey [J].
Akgun, Aykut .
LANDSLIDES, 2012, 9 (01) :93-106
[3]   Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models [J].
Lee, Saro ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet .
LANDSLIDES, 2007, 4 (01) :33-41
[4]   Machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility studies: A comparative overview of algorithm performance [J].
Merghadi, Abdelaziz ;
Yunus, Ali P. ;
Dou, Jie ;
Whiteley, Jim ;
Binh ThaiPham ;
Dieu Tien Bui ;
Avtar, Ram ;
Abderrahmane, Boumezbeur .
EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2020, 207
[5]  
Pedregosa F, 2011, J MACH LEARN RES, V12, P2825
[6]  
Qiu T., 2023, FHWAPA2024003CIAMTIS
[7]   A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models [J].
Reichenbach, Paola ;
Rossi, Mauro ;
Malamud, Bruce D. ;
Mihir, Monika ;
Guzzetti, Fausto .
EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2018, 180 :60-91
[8]   Occurrence probability assessment of earthquake-triggered landslides with Newmark displacement values and logistic regression: The Wenchuan earthquake, China [J].
Wang, Ying ;
Song, Chongzhen ;
Lin, Qigen ;
Li, Juan .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2016, 258 :108-119
[9]   Landslide susceptibility mapping: A comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey) [J].
Yesilnacar, E ;
Topal, T .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2005, 79 (3-4) :251-266
[10]   Landslide susceptibility delineation in the Ar-Rayth area, Jizan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, using analytical hierarchy process, frequency ratio, and logistic regression models [J].
Youssef, Ahmed M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2015, 73 (12) :8499-8518