Assessment of the EDC/finite rate chemistry approach towards predicting extinction in a turbulent buoyant diffusion flame

被引:3
作者
At Thabari, Jeri [1 ]
Kruljevic, Boris [2 ]
Maragkos, Georgios [1 ]
Snegirev, Alexander [1 ]
Merci, Bart [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Struct Engn & Bldg Mat, Technol pk 60, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Paris Saclay, CNRS, CentraleSupelec, Lab EM2C, Lab EM2C, F-91190 Gif Sur Yvette, France
关键词
Finite-rate chemistry; Extinction; EDC; Fire; LES; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS; FLAMMABILITY LIMITS; COMBUSTION; SCALAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.proci.2024.105602
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Large eddy simulations with the eddy dissipation concept (EDC) combustion model, considering finite rate chemistry effects, are presented for fire-related scenarios (i.e., in the 'FM Global burner' test case). The considered reaction mechanisms are first studied in mixture fraction space, without the inclusion of transport terms in physical space, by means of a 0-D conditional moment closure (CMC) method. The focus of the work is on exploring the capabilities of EDC, combined with finite rate chemistry, towards capturing extinction phenomena in low strain, buoyant diffusion flames without the need of additional extinction criteria as needed with the use of fast chemistry. The considered scenarios involve cases with and without flame extinction as well as different fuels (hence, also various finite rate chemistry mechanisms). The predictive capabilities of simple reaction mechanisms is examined in a range of grid sizes, by comparison to experimental data for first and second order statistics. The results demonstrate that simple mechanisms predict both the temperature fields and combustion efficiencies reasonably well for the scenarios tested (10% relative deviation). Furthermore, the addition of more reactions and species (i.e. going to more detailed reactions) does not necessarily improve the results for the flames at hand.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
At Thabari J., 2023, Flow Turbul. Combust., P1
[2]   The Eddy Dissipation Concept-Analysis of Different Fine Structure Treatments for Classical Combustion [J].
Boesenhofer, Markus ;
Wartha, Eva-Maria ;
Jordan, Christian ;
Harasek, Michael .
ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (07)
[3]   Proceedings of the first workshop organized by the IAFSS Working Group on Measurement and Computation of Fire Phenomena (MaCFP) [J].
Brown, A. ;
Bruns, M. ;
Gollner, M. ;
Hewson, J. ;
Maragkos, G. ;
Marshall, A. ;
McDermott, R. ;
Merci, B. ;
Rogaume, T. ;
Stoliarov, S. ;
Torero, J. ;
Trouve, A. ;
Wang, Y. ;
Weckman, E. .
FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 2018, 101 :1-17
[4]   Flammability of methane, propane, and hydrogen gases [J].
Cashdollar, KL ;
Zlochower, IA ;
Green, GM ;
Thomas, RA ;
Hertzberg, M .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2000, 13 (3-5) :327-340
[5]  
CERFACS, 2023, C3H8/air 2-step mechanism
[6]  
CERFACS, 2023, Frassoldati) skeletal mechanism
[7]  
CERFACS, 2023, skeletal mechanism
[8]  
Coward H.F., 1952, LIMITS FLAMMABILITY, P503
[9]   Numerical Simulation of Delft-Jet-in-Hot-Coflow (DJHC) Flames Using the Eddy Dissipation Concept Model for Turbulence-Chemistry Interaction [J].
De, Ashoke ;
Oldenhof, Ernst ;
Sathiah, Pratap ;
Roekaerts, Dirk .
FLOW TURBULENCE AND COMBUSTION, 2011, 87 (04) :537-567
[10]  
Frassoldati A., 2009, 1st international conference on sustainable fossil fuels for future energy, P6