Opportunistic Salpingectomy Between 2017 and 2020: A Descriptive Analysis

被引:2
作者
Kaur, Paramdeep [1 ]
Rufin, Khaye [1 ]
Finlayson, Sarah J. [1 ]
Huntsman, David G. [1 ,2 ]
Kwon, Janice S. [1 ]
McAlpine, Jessica N. [1 ]
Miller, Dianne M. [1 ]
Hanley, Gillian E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, Div Gynaecol Oncol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Pathol & Lab Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
ovarian cancer; primary prevention; population-based administrative data; opportunistic salpingectomy; BILATERAL SALPINGECTOMY; CANCER; RISK; BRCA1; WOMEN; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogc.2023.102278
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) is the removal of fallopian tubes during another pelvic surgery for the purpose of ovarian cancer prevention. Herein, we describe the rates of OS at the time of hysterectomy and tubal sterilization between 2017 and 2020. Methods: This study uses the Canadian Institute of Health Information's Discharge Abstract Database and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System for all Canadian provinces and territories except for Quebec between the fiscal years 2017 and 2020. A descriptive analysis on all people aged 15 years and older who had hysterectomies or tubal sterilizations was conducted to determine the proportion of hysterectomies that included bilateral salpingectomy (OS) and the proportion of tubal sterilizations that were OS compared to tubal ligation. Results: There were 174 006 people included in the study. The proportion of hysterectomies that included OS increased from 31.7% in 2017 to 39.9% by 2020. With respect to tubal sterilizations, rates of OS increased from 26.3% of all tubal sterilizations in 2017 to 42.5% in 2020. British Columbia remained the jurisdiction with the highest rates of OS, but rates increased significantly in many jurisdictions, particularly at the time of tubal sterilization. Conclusion: The rates of OS have continued to increase in all Canadian jurisdictions following the official Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada recommendation to consider OS in 2015. Assuming that all tubal ligations could have been OS and 75% of hysterectomies with ovarian conservation could have included OS, our data indicate 76 932 missed opportunities for ovarian cancer prevention.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Projected estimates of cancer in Canada in 2020
    Brenner, Darren R.
    Weir, Hannah K.
    Demers, Alain A.
    Ellison, Larry F.
    Louzado, Cheryl
    Shaw, Amanda
    Turner, Donna
    Woods, Ryan R.
    Smith, Leah M.
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2020, 192 (09) : E199 - E205
  • [2] Bilateral salpingectomy versus bilateral partial salpingectomy during cesarean delivery
    Duncan, Jose R.
    Jones, Heather L.
    Hoffer, Stefanie O.
    Schenone, Mauro H.
    Mari, Giancarlo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2018, 10 : 649 - 653
  • [3] Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCAI or BRCA2 mutations
    Eleje, George U.
    Eke, AhizechukwuC
    Ezebialu, Ifeanyichukwu U.
    Ikechebelu, Joseph I.
    Ugwu, Emmanuel O.
    Okonkwo, Onyinye O.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (08):
  • [4] Impact of Oophorectomy on Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Women With a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation
    Finch, Amy P. M.
    Lubinski, Jan
    Moller, Pal
    Singer, Christian F.
    Karlan, Beth
    Senter, Leigha
    Rosen, Barry
    Maehle, Lovise
    Ghadirian, Parviz
    Cybulski, Cezary
    Huzarski, Tomasz
    Eisen, Andrea
    Foulkes, William D.
    Kim-Sing, Charmaine
    Ainsworth, Peter
    Tung, Nadine
    Lynch, Henry T.
    Neuhausen, Susan
    Metcalfe, Kelly A.
    Thompson, Islay
    Murphy, Joan
    Sun, Ping
    Narod, Steven A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15) : 1547 - U43
  • [5] Salpingectomy Compared With Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Garcia, Christine
    Moskowitz, Olivia M.
    Chisholm, Christian A.
    Duska, Linda R.
    Warren, Amy L.
    Lyons, Genevieve R.
    Pettit, Kate E.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 132 (01) : 29 - 34
  • [6] First step in implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy for prevention of ovarian cancer: Current care and its determinants
    Gelderblom, Malou E.
    Jaspers, Veerle
    Akkermans, Reinier P.
    Slangen, Brigitte
    Oei, Angele L. M.
    van Ginkel, Alexandra A.
    Ngo, Huy
    IntHout, Joanna
    Hermens, Rosella P. M. G.
    de Hullu, Joanne A.
    Piek, Jurgen M. J.
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2023, 102 (03) : 257 - 269
  • [7] Hanley Gillian E, 2022, CMAJ Open, V10, pE466, DOI 10.9778/cmajo.20210219
  • [8] Outcomes From Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Ovarian Cancer Prevention
    Hanley, Gillian E.
    Pearce, Celeste Leigh
    Talhouk, Aline
    Kwon, Janice S.
    Finlayson, Sarah J.
    McAlpine, Jessica N.
    Huntsman, David G.
    Miller, Dianne
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (02)
  • [9] Examining indicators of early menopause following opportunistic salpingectomy: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada
    Hanley, Gillian E.
    Kwon, Janice S.
    McAlpine, Jessica N.
    Huntsman, David G.
    Finlayson, Sarah J.
    Miller, Dianne
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 223 (02) : 221.e1 - 221.e11
  • [10] Henley SJ, 2020, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V126, P2225, DOI [10.1002/cncr.32802, 10.1002/cncr.31551]