Kill or Spare - Moral Decision-Making in Video Games

被引:1
作者
Holl, Elisabeth [1 ]
Melzer, Andre [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Luxembourg, Esch Zur Alzette, Luxembourg
来源
ENTERTAINMENT COMPUTING, ICEC 2021 | 2021年 / 13056卷
关键词
Gaming; Morality; Quantitative experiment; Decision-making; DISENGAGEMENT; CHARACTER; VIOLENCE;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-89394-1_7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Video game titles with meaningful and morally relevant storylines are becoming increasingly popular and an intensely researched topic for entertainment scholars. Furthermore, virtual moral processing can contribute significantly to the understanding of human morality in general. In the current psychological laboratory experiment, N = 101 participants played four chapters of Detroit: Become Human for approx. 55 min featuring up to 13 moral decisions, which were presented either under time pressure or not. Before playing, participants were assigned to one of three conditions (playing a morally vs. immorally framed character vs. no framing/control condition). As expected, players generally preferred to act morally sound regardless of character framing. Time pressure further increased the proportion of moral (vs. immoral) decision-making. Our results underline that moral decision-making is dependent on specific contexts and that morality theories can be applied to virtual gaming scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 99
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Does avatar identification make unjustified video game violence more morally consequential?
    Allen, Johnie J.
    Anderson, Craig A.
    [J]. MEDIA PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 24 (02) : 236 - 258
  • [2] Bandura Albert., 1990, Origins of Terrorism, P161
  • [3] Revisiting External Validity: Concerns about Trolley Problems and Other Sacrificial Dilemmas in Moral Psychology
    Bauman, Christopher W.
    McGraw, A. Peter
    Bartels, Daniel M.
    Warren, Caleb
    [J]. SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2014, 8 (09): : 536 - 554
  • [4] Of Mice, Men, and Trolleys: Hypothetical Judgment Versus Real-Life Behavior in Trolley-Style Moral Dilemmas
    Bostyn, Dries H.
    Sevenhant, Sybren
    Roets, Arne
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 29 (07) : 1084 - 1093
  • [5] Clemen RT, 1999, RISK ANAL, V19, P187, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00399.x
  • [6] Playing a Better Me: How Players Rehearse Their Ethos via Moral Choices
    Consalvo, Mia
    Busch, Thorsten
    Jong, Carolyn
    [J]. GAMES AND CULTURE, 2019, 14 (03) : 216 - 235
  • [7] The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm
    Cushman, Fiery
    Young, Liane
    Hauser, Marc
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (12) : 1082 - 1089
  • [8] An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment
    Greene, JD
    Sommerville, RB
    Nystrom, LE
    Darley, JM
    Cohen, JD
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2001, 293 (5537) : 2105 - 2108
  • [9] The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment
    Haidt, J
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (04) : 814 - 834
  • [10] Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues
    Haidt, Jonathan
    Joseph, Craig
    [J]. DAEDALUS, 2004, 133 (04) : 55 - 66